Sunday, January 27, 2008

Women lose in Mexico Indian rights gain: 1-27-2008

Women lose in Mexico Indian rights gain
By MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer
Sun Jan 27, 2008 @1:35 PM ET
SANTA MARIA QUIEGOLANI, Mexico - Women in this Indian village high in the pine-clad mountains of Oaxaca rise each morning at 4 a.m. to gather firewood, grind corn, prepare the day's food, care for the children and clean the house.
But they aren't allowed to vote in local elections, because — the men say — they don't do enough work.
It was here, in a village that has struggled for centuries to preserve its Zapotec traditions, that Eufrosina Cruz, 27, decided to become the first woman to run for mayor — despite the fact that women aren't allowed to attend town assemblies, much less run for office.
The all-male town board tore up ballots cast in her favor in the Nov. 4 election, arguing that as a woman, she wasn't a "citizen" of the town. "That is the custom here, that only the citizens vote, not the women," said Valeriano Lopez, the town's deputy mayor.
Rather than give up, Cruz has launched the first serious, national-level challenge to traditional Indian forms of government, known as "use and customs," which were given full legal status in Mexico six years ago in response to Indian rights movements sweeping across Latin America.
"For me, it's more like 'abuse and customs,'" Cruz said as she submitted her complaint in December to the National Human Rights Commission. "I am demanding that we, the women of the mountains, have the right to decide our lives, to vote and run for office, because the constitution says we have these rights."
Lopez acknowledged that votes for Cruz were nullified, but claims they added up to only 8 ballots of about 100 cast in this largely unpaved village of about 1,500 people.
Cruz says she was winning — and wants the election to be annulled and held again, this time with women voting.
But the male leaders are refusing to budge. "We live differently here, senor, than people in the city. Here, women are dedicated to their homes, and men work the fields," Apolonio Mendoza, the secretary of the all-male town council, told a visiting reporter.
Cruz has received some support from older men, who by village law lose their political rights when they turn 60. Some younger men also say the system must change and give women more rights.
At a recent meeting of several dozen Cruz supporters, most of them voteless, women in traditional gray shawls recalled being turned down for government aid programs because they weren't accompanied by a man.
Martina Cruz Moreno, 19, said that when her widowed mother sought government-provided building materials to improve her dirt-floor, tin-roofed wooden home, village authorities told her, "Go get yourself a husband."
As a woman, Eufrosina Cruz is not only barred from being mayor, but from participating in the "community labor" that qualifies male villagers as "citizens." Those tasks include repairing roads, herding cattle, cleaning streets and raising crops.
"I'd like to see the men here make tortillas, just for one day, and then tell me that's not work," said Cruz, describing the hours-long process of cleaning, soaking, cooking and milling the corn, shaping the flour into flat disks, and collecting the firewood to heat the clay and brick hearths on which most women cook.
During all-important village festivals, women are expected to cook for all the male guests. But instead of joining them at the table, Cruz says, they are relegated to straw mats on the floor. Clothes are washed by hand, and while most homes have some form of running water, it's often only a single spigot.
Cruz decided to escape that life after she saw her 12-year-old sister given to an older man in a marriage arranged by her father. The sister had her first child at 13, and has since borne seven more.
Cruz was 11 and "I didn't even know what a bus was then."
She traveled to the nearest city to enroll in school, live with relatives and support herself through odd jobs, eventually graduating from college with a degree in accounting.
She is single, and in a village culture where most women wear skirts, she wears pants. Because her village has no formal jobs for women, she works as a school director in a nearby town, and returns to Quiegolani most weekends. That, authorities say, disqualified her from running for mayor because she wasn't a full-time resident. But the man who won the race also works outside the town, and there are questions about how much time he actually spends here.
Cruz views the residency issue as a pretext, noting that authorities have also banned female candidates and anybody with a college degree from running. She said she has followed the use and custom rules as much as she was allowed to, carefully fulfilling lower-level duties that function as a means of testing people's devotion to their village. For four years, she "carried the Virgin" in a religious procession through the town, and has helped fund or organize other festivities.
Cruz figured her case for annulling the elections was solid — after all, Mexico's constitution guarantees both men and women the right to vote. She went first to the Oaxaca state electoral council, then to the state congress. After both upheld the election, she took her fight to the commission in Mexico City.
"I am not asking anything for myself. I am asking on behalf of Indian women, so that never again will the laws allow political segregation," Cruz wrote to the commissioners, who may take months to investigate the case, and who could recommend that state authorities protect women's rights to vote or hold office. She says she'll go higher, to federal electoral authorities, if necessary.
In Mexico, many local governance rules date to before the Spanish conquest and weren't given national legal recognition until a 2001 Indian rights reform was enacted in the wake of the Zapatista rebel uprising in Chiapas.
The law states that Indian townships may "apply their own normative systems ... as long as they obey the general principles of the Constitution and respect the rights of individuals, human rights, and particularly the dignity and well-being of women."
Despite this specific protection, about a fourth of the Indian villages operating under the law don't let women vote, putting human rights groups in a dilemma: Most actively supported recognition for Indian governance systems, and few have therefore taken up the women's cause.
Cruz now travels alone from one government office to another, always carrying an armful of calla lilies. "This flower grows a lot in the village. Even though we don't water or care for it much, it flowers," she explained. "It is a symbol for us Indian women."
"The congress upheld the vote out of sheer laziness, to avoid stirring up the village or causing a conflict there," said Rep. Perla Woolrich, a Oaxaca state legislator who supported Cruz's cause. "In the past, use and customs represented something positive, but by now it violates people's constitutional rights. Use and customs have to reviewed, and those practices that violate rights have to be thrown out."
Cruz says she isn't against all customs in her village. She prefers its bipartisanship to political party rivalry because it encourages close-knit Indian communities to stick together and underpins their survival.
"There are really beautiful things in use and customs, if they are applied as they should be," she said.
"Up there in the mountains, unfortunately, nobody listens to us," she says. "If nothing is done, we'll go on the same way for another century in Quiegolani."
++++++++++++++
Comment: Is there anyway us here in the so-called land of the free and home of the brave can help expose the situation down there? ~Peta
+++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together and Create!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka:Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Email: sacranative@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/


http://www.networkaztlan.com/
C/S



Myrna> Re: [NetworkAztlan_News] You Tube Video> Spin: 1-28-08 Obama Win Plus Local Level

Domingo, January 27, 2008 @9:07 AM

Gracias Myrna ~ I appreciate your response. We need to open up and share with others without being worried about political correctness.
No one has the corner on truth, each of us have our truth and we need
to put our spin on current events.
Latinos-Chicanos are treated by the corporate mass media as if we are invisible. the invisible minority, who will someday soon be the largest minority inside the United States.
We are a complex and beautiful people. I will post videos in the forms of spins from time to time that are off the top of my head without a script.
I am of that 'lost tribe' called the Chicanos. I first got involved in the early Chicano Movement struggles with MAYA, Brown Berets, MECHA, UFW and other groups in the late 60's. We need to think bigger and wider in relation to our role in the world today and have a global overview and long-range strategic vision of where we want to go in the future.
These Presidential Primaries come and go and it will leave us still in a weak nearly powerless position as people of La Raza Cosmica, but our numbers and powers expand exponentially when we link up with other peoples, stand on our indigenous roots here in Aztlan and ally our forces with others, including Black/African American people and White folks who are willing to break bread with us in harmony as HUMANE BEINGS!
We gotta dump the old stale Chicano cultural nationalist trash and wake up to the new interconnected realities of the New Millenium. We need to broaden our brains, think globally, link up internationally and join up with the vast masses of the people worldwide. This will give us great and needed inspiration. Sometimes to get to heaven we have to raise a little hell!
It is kind of spooky sharing online in Yahoo Groups with people who are basically strangers so we need to hang-up our hang-ups! I am not hiding from anyone. I would rather stick my neck out that have my head buried in the sand or up somewhere where its dark! .
To hell with Amerikan Fascism, paranoism is for perverts and let us all stay alive, awke and alert! Power to the People! Let My People Stay!
End the Amerikan Occupation of Iraq! Lock and Load!
~Peta-de-Aztlan
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Myrna Ulrich <myrnaulrich@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thank You so Much for the Links.. And you are Very so right on target!! Myrna

"Peter S. Lopez de-Aztlan" <sacranative@yahoo.com> wrote:
Below is the Link. We need to open up more online and share videos with each other so we have a better picture and understanding of who we are and what our positions are on various issues of today. ~Blessings!
YouTube VIdeo by Peter S. Lopez ~aka Peta
Spin: 1-28-08 Obama Win Plus Local Level


+++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together and Create!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka:Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Email: sacranative@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/


http://www.networkaztlan.com/
C/S




Myrna C Ulrich 'HOPE IS A GOOD THING'
__._,_.___
Monitor: Peter S. Lopez "Peta": sacranative@yahoo.com
List owner: Guillermo Bejarano: aztlannet@yahoo.com

To see and modify all of your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
You can subscribe to four (4) groups:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Arte
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Action
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Native-Views
OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.NetworkAztlan.com
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Improvement Zone
Find support & keep
New Year's goals.
Yahoo! Groups
Connect w/others
who love dogs.
Featured Y! Groups
There is something
for everyone.
.

__,_._,___



+++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together and Create!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka:Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Email: sacranative@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/


http://www.networkaztlan.com/
C/S



Thursday, January 24, 2008

Disputed Alcatraz invasion flag on block: SF Chronicle

Disputed Alcatraz invasion flag on block

Thursday, January 24, 2008
Sometime during the 19-month American Indian occupation of Alcatraz that began in 1969, a banner called Old Glory's Helper Flag flew from one of the island's guard towers.
Whether the tepee-emblazoned flag flew for 10 minutes, 10 months, or more, no one seems to know for sure. But Thursday, the flag, designed by Lulie Nall, a Penobscot Indian who struggled for years to promote it as a American Indian symbol until her death in 1983, is expected to sell for between $100,000 and $150,000 at an auction in San Francisco, according to an auction house.
"It's not just a flag. It's a moment in history," said Bruce MacMakin, a senior vice president with PBA Galleries on Kearny Street, an auction house that specializes in Americana. PBA Galleries is auctioning the flag on behalf of Daniel Hagar, a Florida man identified as the stepson of Nall's nephew.
In the past week, as word has spread among American Indians about the auction of the flag, Nall has been called both a peace activist and an opportunist. Her flag has been deemed insignificant by some and a historical artifact by others. The occupation's key organizers do not seem to remember her or the flag, yet most agree that Old Glory's Helper should be preserved.
Nall was living in North Beach as a housewife, seamstress and unlucky 56-year-old entrepreneur when she came up with the idea for Old Glory's Helper. As a Penobscot Indian, she wanted to promote the flag as a symbol of unity honoring American Indians, according to paperwork that will accompany the flag.
She had been working on the flag's design for more than a year when, in November 1969, an inter-tribal group of American Indians invaded Alcatraz, claiming the island as Indian property. It wasn't the first attempt by American Indians to claim the island, but it proved to be the most momentous in the American Indian civil rights movement of the 20th century.
Inspired by Indian leaders Richard Oakes, Adam Fortunate Eagle Nordwall and John Trudell, American Indians from across the nation flocked to the Bay Area to take part in the movement. Among the estimated 10,000 to 15,000 who spent time on Alcatraz during the occupation that ended in June 1971, some had a genuine interest in fighting for their civil rights, while others were just looking to have a good time. Most were young.
Nall was equally inspired. With $80 earned from selling restored antique hats and worn-out jeans, Nall took her red-and-white-striped design to the Paramount Flag Co. in San Francisco.
"Red represents the American Indian who shares his tepee with fifty state governments. Yellow, Black and Brown people are represented in the fields they help toil and join. ... The gap in the tepee represents the last gap of discrimination," Nall wrote in notes about the flag, which include years of unfinished planning, failed marketing plans and copies of unanswered letters to celebrities, including Marlon Brando.
Although the exact date is unknown, Nall visited Alcatraz during the occupation and delivered Old Glory's Helper. A personal snapshot in PBA Galleries' files shows a conservatively dressed Nall handing the flag over to the men who raised it. There is also a Jan. 8, 1970, photograph of Old Glory's Helper published in The Chronicle with an article headlined "Factionalism and Feuds," but the story makes no mention of the flag.
What flag?
"I have never heard of Miss Nall, and I have never seen that flag," said Nordwall, a 78-year-old Chippewa Indian identified by the FBI as the principal organizer of the Alcatraz occupation. "That flag was never a symbol of Indian resistance and not a symbol of Alcatraz. It was simply an accessory as far as I can tell."
Nordwall, who lives on a reservation in Nevada, formed a group called Indians of All Tribes of Alcatraz and recruited a young Mohawk and San Francisco State College student named Richard Oakes to help plot the 1969 invasion. The activists chose the isolated but well-known island to ensure a nonviolent takeover and to maximize media coverage,
Nordwall said. Although Nordwall didn't spend any nights on Alcatraz, he regularly visited during the occupation for meetings.
Nordwall is irked by the sale of the flag. "On the one hand, Miss Nall seems to have wanted to exploit and commercialize the occupation for her own personal gain," he said. "At the same time, it is doing a service to draw attention to the importance of the 19-month occupation of Alcatraz."
John Trudell, a Santee Sioux Indian who rose to a leadership role during the occupation, declined to be interviewed for this story. In a statement issued through his publicist, Trudell said that he has "no memory whatsoever of Lulie Nall or of her flag." Trudell also said that he does not support the sale of the flag and feels that it should be donated to a museum.
Ed Castillo, professor and director of Native American studies at Sonoma State University, visited the island for eight weeks during the occupation when he was 21 and just out of college.
"I vaguely remember the flag, but I don't think I ever saw it up close," said Castillo. "It doesn't stand out in my memory as the main visual statement. There was quite a lot of graffiti and other types of expression going on. I remember seeing lots of upside down American flags on the island meant to symbolize an international distress situation."
Blackfeet Indian Joe Lonewalker Morris, a longshoreman, joined the occupation in 1969. An artist, Morris spent much of his time on the island painting and organizing artistic endeavors. Morris doesn't recall Nall's flag either, but said he did bring one of his own - a blue Blackfeet Nation flag.
"That's the only flag I remember," said Morris.
On Jan. 5, 1970 - the same week The Chronicle published a picture of Old Glory's Helper - Time magazine had a story headlined "New Flag Over Alcatraz." The story describes yet another flag: "They have raised their own flag over Alcatraz: a broken peace pipe and crimson tepee emblazoned on a field of azure."
That some of the key leaders don't recall Nall or her flag doesn't surprise Craig Glassner, a National Parks Ranger who has worked on Alcatraz for the past 15 years.
"There may have been upwards of 15,000 people who came and went on the island during the occupation. Some who came in the beginning never met those who came at the end," said Glassner.
The nephew's stepson
Hagar, a 55-year-old disabled and retired veteran with no American Indian blood, inherited the flag from his stepfather, Matt Faircloth, in the late 1980s. Hagar never met Nall and saw the flag only a couple of times at his stepfather's house. But Hagar was intrigued by Nall and her flag, though admittedly he knew little about the woman other than that she was an artist living in San Francisco and his stepfather's favorite aunt.
"My grandfather was a fairly famous archaeologist named William Bebee, and I remember being a kid going on digs with him and finding arrowheads and things like that," said Hagar. "I've always been interested in the subject. But the flag has been in my closet for years. It belongs in a museum or something. If someone is willing to pay a lot of money for it, then they're obviously going to take better care of it than I can."
A couple of years ago, Hagar, who is recovering from multiple strokes and is in need of money to supplement his retirement, brought the flag to Sotheby's in Massachusetts. He said they gave Hagar a verbal appraisal of $150,000 to $250,000 but refused to sell it.
"They said that it was such an historical piece and it should be in a museum like the Smithsonian, which I agree with," said Hagar.
Hagar then sent letters to about 10 celebrities offering to sell them the flag along with the provenance of paperwork and notes left behind by Nall. He contacted Kevin Costner, Nick Nolte and Paul Newman, among others. Hagar heard back only from Costner, who declined the offer.
He then took Nall's flag to two large Indian gaming casinos in Connecticut. Neither were interested; their representatives said it didn't pertain to their tribes. Hagar then contacted several American Indian museums around the country.
"They were all hot about it - but only if I'd give it to them for free," said Hagar, who connected with PBA Galleries last summer.
MacMakin acknowledged that it was difficult for PBA Galleries to evaluate the unique flag. He likened it to lithograph of an abolitionist rabbi from New Orleans in the Civil War who was mocked as a "Lincoln lover." Bidding for the lithograph began at around $1,500. It ended up selling for $110,000.
At 1 p.m. Thursday, PBA Galleries will open bidding for the flag at $50,000, half the low estimate, which is standard for auctions, MacMakin said.
The gallery will collect 10 percent of the price and a 15 percent premium from the buyer. There has been early interest from several potential buyers, mostly private collectors.
It is difficult to determine what Nall would have thought about the sale of her flag. She has no known survivors and spent the last years of her life caring for her dying husband.
"Her husband, John, had some kind of vertigo disease and couldn't walk," said George Weaver a longtime custodian at Nall's apartment building on Stockton Street. Weaver knew nothing about the flag. "I think they lived off of his disability check and whatever money she made from sewing clothes and selling them at flea markets."
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The biggest clues to Nall's personality and her project are in the piles of notes and copies of letters she left behind with the flag. In a July 15, 1975, letter to longtime Bay Area news anchor Dave McElhatton, she wrote:
"What really bugs me is after so much work to create my flag that I have been unable to penetrate the walls of the right places to give my flag a true testing. I almost cry when I see it folded in the attache case waiting to be seen. With the Bicentennial just about here, I feel it is now or never. And I am hoping by writing to you, you may have some ideas or know someone who might be able to steer me in the right direction to put OLD GLORY'S HELPER FLAG to work."
As ever
Lulie V. Nall.
Chronicle librarian Johnny Miller contributed to this report. E-mail Delfin Vigil at dvigil@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
+++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/


http://www.networkaztlan.com/
C/S



Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Observations re article by Carlos Munoz and other comments: By Nativo Lopez

Gracias ~ Posting to make sure this Mensaje/Message got out to others by Hermano Nativo.
~ Peta
Nativo Lopez <nlopez@hermandadmexicana.org> wrote:
Brothers Peter and Guillermo:
For some reason my emails to the Network are bouncing back. It's probably due to our internal server and the Network not recognizing my email address - nlopez@hermandadmexicana.org.
I wanted to contribute to the discussion about Carlos Munoz's article and Rosalio Munoz's comments. Here goes....
Companeros of the Network:
Carlos Munoz makes the most compelling argument for not supporting either Obama or Clinton. A focus on the issues and continued organizing of our independent forces would put us in a much better position to contend with whoever takes the White House and the U.S. Congress. The fact of the matter is that the Obama and Clinton voting record is almost identical on all issues of major concern to voters, and that includes Latinos. What good is affirmative action if the new master, or puppet of the master, is brown, black, or female continues to perpetuate the same policies, or modified or moderated versions of the same. The boot still feels the same, but only adds insult to injury. The insult comes from the fact that the newly elected politician does exactly as his corporate backers dictate, and not as one of the same group, race, or gender would invest in him or her with one's own aspirations for change. And, what's more, we insult ourselves when we harbor the silly illusion that the color or gender of the politician necessarily makes them more sensitive, progressive, malleable, or responsive to the needs and desires of those from whence they come. History has demonstrated that this is not the case, with very few exceptions. Or, it has been othewise when the local electorate is sufficiently organized to hold such a politician to account.
One could argue that we required such a period of political development and sophistication (the masses) when such an illusion was general and necessary (the narrow nationalist period), before our electorate came to take the social dimension more into consideration and looked beyond race, ethnicity, and gender. Today, we have the largest number of Latinos, blacks, and females elected to political office at all levels of government than any other time in the history of the U.S. Yet, our electorate (Latino) has a diversity of experiences, multi-generational in terms of immigration, and spreading social polarization, and I believe that this accounts for a continuation of relevance and importance of race, ethnicity, and gender in the mind of still large enough segments of the Latino electorate. Where Jews and blacks vote in greater similarity, Latinos are still spread out - less homogeneous. With the greater corporatization of state and federal elections (and even local in many cases) and the increasingly expensiveness of races, and the further monopolization of the media, the local electorate becomes less and less relevant. This speaks to the case of candidate Dennis Kucinich. He has the most progressive positions (and record) on all major issues of concern, yet, his poll numbers remain flat, no corporate contributions to his campaign, censured by the media and excluded from the debates. His message is not resonating with the electorate because he can't get his message to that electorate.
We are required to be honest with the electorate of our community as leaders and experienced political fighters. It does us little justice to imbue in the candidates qualities that they do not possess merely because we desire change as much as the next guy, or due to a particular partisan ideology that permanently or temporarily aligns itself with the party out of power - the Democratic. The honest fact of the matter is that Obama and Clinton talk about an end to the war from the perspective of re-deployment (not an immediate return of U.S. troops to their loved ones); they talk about universal healthcare from the perspective of ensuring the integrity of the insurance companies interests (not excluding the 30 percent take by the private insurance companies, which results in inflating the true cost of service, exclusions, and denials of service); they support continued aggressive immigration enforcement in the interior and on the border, and both voted for the constuction of the border wall, while supporting the vague call for a "path to legalization," split on the driver's license issue, advocate in favor of employer sanctions, raids, and deportations, and I could go on. The record speaks for itself.
Race and gender should not be a factor in our consideration for endorsement. It should be the content of their character as reflected in their political trajectory, voting record, and policy initiatives as these address our material and spiritual needs. Shame on those political activists who continue to use these factors as a consideration for their recommendation to others less politically astute, active, or conscious who honesetly search for leadership and look to others for such recommendation. We need to get beyond these factors. We are required to move forward in our thinking and analyze the issues that affect our constituency and honestly lay out which of the candidates best address these issues and merit our support. On the other hand, we have a greater obligation to continue building independent political organization amongst our people to hold those who govern accountable, which inevitably translates into them obeying the governed. This is where our greatest strength lies.
Saludos,
Nativo V. Lopez
+++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together and Create!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka:Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Email: sacranative@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/


http://www.networkaztlan.com/
C/S


Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.