Monday, March 02, 2009

Activists protest immigration raids in Phoenix

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE5200L020090301

Activists protest immigration raids in Phoenix

Sun Mar 1, 2009 3:16am EST
Photo

By Tim Gaynor

PHOENIX (Reuters) - Thousands of people protesting a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigrants by an Arizona sheriff marched through Phoenix on Saturday, toting placards reading "We Are Human" and "Stop the Raids."


Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has dispatched deputies into Hispanic communities in the Phoenix area where they stop people and arrest anyone who cannot prove he or she is a legal U.S. resident.


Under a deal allowing them to enforce federal immigration laws, the deputies have arrested more than 1,500 people whom they determined were in Arizona illegally.


Latino activists and lawmakers call his program a clear case of racial profiling because only people who look Hispanic are targeted. Arpaio steadfastly denies the charge.


Earlier this month, he stirred more controversy when he marched 220 illegal immigrants in shackles and striped prison garb through Phoenix under armed guard.


"Walking people through the streets in chains, public shaming, it's medieval," said Veronica Perez, 32, an archeologist carrying signs reading "No Human Is Illegal" and "Stop the Raids."


"Isn't cruel and unusual punishment against the U.S. Constitution?" she asked.


The event was organized by activists from the National Day Laborer Organizing Network and a group called El Puente Arizona. Estimates of the number of participants ranged from 1,000 to 3,000.


Preparing for the march at a park in central Phoenix, school district coordinator Sylvia Airington, 47, slammed Arpaio's policies.


"Racial profiling, targeting the Hispanic community -- it's an embarrassment to America," she said.


What to do about an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States is an explosive political issue. But it has largely dropped out of the debate as concerns turn to the economic crisis.


A bid to push comprehensive immigration reform through Congress was rejected by Republican lawmakers two years ago. President Barack Obama, who supported the measure, has yet to address the matter.


"I voted for Obama for change," said welder Oscar Camacho, 45.. "But with respect to immigration, I see no change at all."


Around 100 counter-demonstrators waving American flags turned out to support Arpaio on Saturday. Some carried holstered pistols.


"He is the only one to uphold illegal immigration laws," said Dina Rose, 52, standing on sidewalk by the sheriff's office in downtown Phoenix. "The county sheriff is America's last hope of protecting our freedoms."

(Editing by Xavier Briand)

 

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com


Sunday, March 01, 2009

Remembering Geronimo 100 years after his death: Indian Country

http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national/40419807.html

Remembering Geronimo 100 years after his death

Photo by Mary Kim Titla

Young Apache dancers from the San Carlos Apache Tribe entertain the crowd at the Geronimo Memorial.

By Mary Kim Titla, Today correspondent

SAN CARLOS, Ariz. – One might say the winding, rocky dirt road leading to the Geronimo Monument on the San Carlos Apache Reservation parallels two things: Geronimo’s life, and the events leading up to the commemoration of the 100-year anniversary of his death which ended with a congressional resolution honoring the Apache warrior.

In mid-February about 300 people, including tribal leaders and members of five Apache Nations from Arizona and New Mexico, gathered to remember a man known to the Chiricahua Apaches as Goyathlay and to the rest of the world as Geronimo. He died of pneumonia Feb. 17, 1909 while a prisoner of war in Ft. Sill, Okla.

The unveiling of a monument in his honor took place on a cold, cloudy day at Old San Carlos, next to San Carlos Lake, about 120 miles east of Phoenix. Witnesses to this historic event diverted off a paved road and drove several miles on a dirt road to take part in the ceremony, which included prayers, speeches, gifting, singing, dancing and feasting.

The U.S. government created the San Carlos Apache reservation in 1872. It immediately became home to the Aravaipa and Pinal Apaches and later to other Apache bands including the Chiricahua. Those held captive considered reservation conditions to be unbearable, including Geronimo, who managed to escape a few times. After his small band of 35 warriors and 80 women and children eluded 5,000 troops for five months, he finally agreed to surrender in 1886. Geronimo and his band were taken by train to Florida and eventually to Oklahoma. Other Chiricahua Apaches, including the scouts who helped find him, had to go too.

Apache bands once camped at Old San Carlos before being relocated several miles north due to the building of Coolidge Dam on the Gila River. The site, along with its burial ground, became submerged underwater. The Geronimo monument now marks what is considered sacred ground.

Wendsler Nosie, chairman of the San Carlos Apache Tribe, organized the event. His goal was to bring the descendants of those torn apart to not only remember the extreme hardships their ancestors endured but to begin a healing and reconciliation process toward harmony and unity.

Photo by Mary Kim Titla

Members of the Jicarilla Apache Nation Tribal Council present gifts to members of the San Carlos Apache Tribal Council at a ceremony honoring the centennial anniversary of the death of Apache Chief Geronimo.

“It’s for the kids, [for them] to hold on to something, which is their identity. It’s up to all of us to step forward, for those yet to be born. Good things will come from it,” said Nosie.

Jerry Gloshay Jr. read a statement on behalf of Chairman Ronnie Lupe of the White Mountain Apache Tribe, who was unable to attend.

“He (Geronimo) rebelled against the intrusion of forts and foreign assimilation tactics in the 1800s,” read Gloshay. “His will for survival is something to behold.”

Planning for this day began months ago. While Nosie’s vision was met with support and enthusiasm by the separate Apache nations, at home he was harshly criticized. Some, like elder Reede Upshaw, wrote letters to the local newspaper claiming he grew up hearing stories about how Geronimo terrorized and murdered his own people. He compared the honoring of Geronimo to honoring Adolf Hitler.

Nosie says he understands why there are harsh words.

“This is the pain and suffering our people lived through. Many of our ancestors have never forgotten the sadness and unforgiving moments. It has been passed on to their children and generations thereafter.

“Is it any wonder that we are so deeply divided, not having dealt with the atrocities? We must cope with what actually happened to our ancestors, put it behind us, begin to heal, understand who we are and go forward together as a tribe and as Apaches.”

To the surprise of many, the four metal sculptures designed by Colville artist Virgil Marchand, did not include Geronimo, but rather a family of four facing the east with their hands extended upward as if to offer prayers.

Two days prior to the unveiling, Charlotte Titla, an elder, went to the site of the monument out of curiosity. During her visit with those camping nearby, the metal statutes were delivered and hoisted above a large concrete foundation. She reminisced about how everyone was joyfully taking part in a blessing ceremony.

Reynard Faber, the traditional Chief of the Jicarilla Apache, expected to see a monument portraying Geronimo, perhaps on a horse.

“Basically it’s very spiritual. It represents all Apaches. Even though it was Geronimo’s day, it wasn’t all about him. To bring all Apaches together, that was significant.” said Faber.

“It was like closing a wound to bring them back together.”

“I was caught by surprise,” said Jo Ann Williams, San Carlos Apache. “Oh God! They’re praying. I was happy to see they are praying.”

Naelyn Pike, 9, summed up the day by reading an essay she wrote for the occasion.

“I will no longer be a victim to the disaster that happened here. You must protect Usen’s (God’s) creation. Join us in the healing so we can change tomorrow. Usen, thank you for this day – for bringing us together.”

Arizona Representative Raul Grijalva and Michigan Representative Dale Kildee pushed for passage of House Resolution 132 recognizing the life and memory of Geronimo and the commencement of a healing process. “The Apache have overcome great adversity, but they are strong as a culture, as a people and in what their future holds,” Grijalva said.

According to Nosie, a ceremony will be held annually at the Geronimo Monument. The project will be expanded with input from tribal members.

<><>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>
NETWORK AZTLAN NEWS BLOG Link
http://aztlannet-news-blog.blogspot.com/

JOIN UP!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/

NETWORK AZTLAN HOME PAGE
http://www.networkaztlan.com/
<><>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<><>

Monday, February 23, 2009

Latino Ex-Presidents on Failed Drug War

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=ads6sZX3Moy8&refer=latin_america

U.S. Latin American Drug War Fails, Ex-Presidents Write in WSJ

By Chris Peterson

 

Feb. 23 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S.-led war on drug crime in Latin America has failed and should be replaced by more humane and efficient ways of dealing with the problem, three former presidents from the region wrote in today's Wall Street Journal.

 

In an opinion-page article, former Brazilian leader Fernando Henrique Cardoso, ex-Colombian president Cesar Gaviria and Mexico's Ernesto Zedillo said the policy based on eradication, interdiction and criminalization of consumers hadn't been effective and the violence and organized crime linked to drug trafficking remained.

 

Latin American is still the world's leading producer of cocaine and cannabis, with opium and heroin now being added to the mix; demand in consumer contries had to be reduced by cutting down the harm caused by drugs, lower consumption through education, and aggressively target organized crime.

 

Changing the attitude towards addicts by regarding them as patients of the public-health services, decriminalizing cannabis while focusing on its harm to health, and mounting prolonged educational campaigns should now be the way forward, they wrote.

Last Updated: February 23, 2009 03:39 EST


http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN11358345

Latin America ex-leaders urge reform of US drug war

Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:33pm EST

By Stuart Grudgings

RIO DE JANEIRO, Feb 11 (Reuters) - The war against drugs is failing and the U.S. government should break with "prohibition" policies that have achieved little more than cram its prisons and stoke violence, three former Latin American presidents said on Wednesday.

The respected former presidents urged the United States and Latin American governments to move away from jailing drug users to debate the legalization of marijuana and place more emphasis on the treatment of addicts.

Former Colombian President Cesar Gaviria said there was no meaningful debate over drugs policy in the United States, despite a broad consensus that current policies had failed.

"The problem today in the U.S. is that narco-trafficking is a crime and so any politician is fearful of talking about narco-trafficking or talking about policies because they will be called soft," he said.

Gaviria has joined with former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso and former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo to try to change the debate on drugs in Latin America, where trafficking gangs have killed tens of thousands of people and weakened democracies through corruption.

From Mexico's gang wars to the drug-funded FARC guerrilla group in Colombia and daily shoot-outs between gangs and police in Rio de Janeiro's shantytowns, much of the region is scarred by drug violence and many believe U.S. policies have failed.

A United Nations meeting in Vienna next month will frame international drugs policy for the next 10 years, and the three former presidents, whose group is called the Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy, said it is time for change.

They pointed to falling street prices for cocaine and still high levels of consumption in the United States despite decades of policies focused on punishing users and cutting supplies from Latin American countries such as Colombia.

'PREJUDICES, FEARS'

The presidents' commission released a report calling on governments to refocus policies toward treating users, move toward decriminalizing marijuana, and invest more in education campaigns. It said current policies were rooted in "prejudices, fears and ideological visions" that inhibited debate.

Even as the group met in Rio on Wednesday, police arrested 51 people in a major operation in the city and other states against a suspected drug smuggling ring that sent cocaine to Europe and brought back synthetic drugs like Ecstasy.

Organized crime has flourished around drugs and is now threatening the stability of Mexico, where a spiraling war between rival gangs killed more than 5,700 people last year.

Cardoso, one of Latin America's most respected figures, said U.S. leadership was essential to break the cycle of drug-related crime and violence. "It will be almost impossible to solve Mexico's problems and other countries' problems without a more ample, comprehensive set of policies from the U.S. government," he said.

Despite winning power on broad promises of change, drugs policy featured little in U.S. President Barack Obama's election campaign and there are few indications that he will embark on a major overhaul.

Gaviria said Washington appeared increasingly isolated in its repressive approach as Latin America and Europe move toward treating drug abuse as a health problem rather than a crime. (Editing by Raymond Colitt and Kieran Murray)

 

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com




Sunday, February 22, 2009

Can The Obama Administration Achieve Immigration Reform? Yes It Can! (Maybe)

http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=74798

20 February 2009
Article by Declan P. Mumford and Peter A. Yost

Barack Obama became the 44th president of the United States amid mile-high expectations for positive change with respect to the economy, war in Iraq, health care, energy policy, the environment—and yes, immigration.

With a new, pragmatic president, centrist administration and a greater Democratic majority in Congress comes a sense of optimism that real immigration reform is possible. But before comprehensive reform can be accomplished, agreements must be reached on controversial issues such as the path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. Proponents of immigration reform must also reassure constituents that such initiatives won't increase competition for increasingly scarce jobs.

Although immigration reform faces challenges, passage of a comprehensive bill is within reach—perhaps even by mid-term elections.

Recent Efforts Toward Comprehensive Reform Have Been Unsuccessful

For the past several years, popular and political opinion have been nearly unanimous that our country's immigration system is broken and an overhaul is overdue. There is also a consensus that the system cannot be reformed piecemeal. Fundamental changes to the system are required—an approach that is now commonly referred to as comprehensive immigration reform (CIR).

Experts agree that CIR will have to encompass certain core elements, including:

  • Increased border security and reduced flow of illegal immigrants into the country
  • Better workplace enforcement and a crackdown on companies who hire illegal immigrants
  • Permanent resolution for the millions of undocumented workers currently in the U.S..

An increase in the number of H-1B visas allotted and reduction/elimination of backlogs for permanent visas are also considered integral to the creation of a better functioning immigration system.

Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) co-sponsored in 2007 a sweeping immigration reform bill that addressed each of the CIR issues described above. Specifically, it provided for enhanced border security and workplace enforcement, created a temporary worker visa category, and offered an eventual path to citizenship for millions of undocumented workers.

Former President George W. Bush backed this legislative initiative and, for a time, it appeared the landmark bill had enough support on both sides of the political aisle to be successful. As the debate came closer to a vote, however, grass roots opposition—in large part from those who argued the McCain-Kennedy bill granted blanket amnesty to illegal aliens—proved too big an obstacle to overcome.

In what Bush later described as one of the biggest disappointments of his presidency, the bill died before coming to a vote, and immigration reform disappeared for the duration of his administration.

Obama's Voting Record, Cabinet Picks Suggest Positive Momentum on Immigration

Obama has a strong record as a proponent of immigration reform. While in the U.S. Senate, he voted in favor of the failed McCain-Kennedy bill, introduced legislation to lower immigration fees (Citizenship Promotion Act) and supported a variety of immigration legislation. As a presidential candidate, he campaigned in favor of CIR and a reduction in visa backlogs. He also denounced workplace immigration raids as an "...ineffective tool in a broken and overwhelmed immigration bureaucracy."

Obama has said his immigration reform priorities include securing our borders, improving the immigration system and bringing undocumented workers out of the shadows. Unfortunately, his administration has not yet articulated a substantive plan for achieving these goals. Obama has, however, designated an immigration policy working group with a mandate to develop a plan to "fix the immigration system through legislative and executive actions that promote prosperity, enhance our security, strengthen families, and advance the rule of law."

Working group co-chairs T. Alexander Aleinikoff, dean of the Georgetown University Law Center, and Professor Mariano-Florentino (Tino) Cuéllar of Stanford University, both held positions in the Clinton administration. Aleinikoff worked for the now-defunct Immigration and Naturalization Service and Cuéllar served in the Treasury Department as senior advisor to the under secretary for enforcement.

Obama's choices for key cabinet posts suggest a strong pro-immigrant, pro-reform agenda—an indicator of how his administration may plan to move forward on a variety of immigration issue.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary—Janet Napolitano

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which maintains responsibility for agencies such as Citizenship and Immigration Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Customs and Border Protection, will be at the center of the immigration debate.

As governor of Arizona, a key border state, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano had extensive experience with immigration issues, particularly those related to border security and enforcement. Although she helped enact legislation in Arizona imposing steep fines on companies hiring illegal workers, she also advocated for increasing the number of available H-1B work visas.

Napolitano was one of 12 governors who signed a 2007 letter urging congressional leaders to increase the H-1B cap. The letter said in part that "until we are able to address this workforce shortage, we must recognize that foreign talent has a role to play in our ability to keep companies located in our state and country; and therefore need to ensure the increased availability of temporary H-1B visas, and permanent resident visas (green cards)."

Department of Labor Secretary Designate—Hilda Solis

The daughter of immigrant parents who held union jobs, Hilda Solis would lead a department that plays an integral role in shaping employment-based immigration policy— particularly with respect to the labor certification process for permanent residence cases. Solis is a five-term Democratic member of Congress from Southern California who has strongly and consistently supported workers' rights and traditional workforce issues, including minimum wage and the right to form unions. A strong supporter of CIR and immigrants rights, Solis co-sponsored immigration legislation in the House and lobbied for the elimination of visa backlogs.

Department of State Secretary—Hillary Rodham Clinton

As a U.S. senator from New York, Hillary Rodham Clinton supported numerous immigration reform initiatives, including the McCain-Kennedy bill. In her role as secretary of state, Clinton will now lead the agency that controls the issuance of temporary and permanent visas—guaranteeing her a seat at the table in the immigration reform discussion. While seeking the Democratic Party nomination for president, Clinton pledged her continuing support for immigration reform, which she said must include toughening security at our borders, placing stronger restrictions or sanctions on employers and providing a path to earned citizenship for people who have been living and working in the United States lawfully.

Future of Immigration Reform Uncertain in 111th Congress

House and the Senate membership on both sides of the aisle was affected by the 2008 election. Several prominent Democratic senators, including Vice President Joseph Biden, Clinton and Sen. Ken Salazar of Colorado, have joined the Obama administration.

In addition, several members of Congress who played prominent roles in past immigration debates will no longer have the same impact on the outcome. Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), a proponent of tougher immigration enforcement and vociferous opponent of granting citizenship to illegal immigrants, has retired from office. Kennedy, who co-sponsored the McCain-Kennedy CIR bill in 2007, has changed committee memberships and no longer serves as the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees and Border Security. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is next in line to lead the committee but does not appear to have the same passion on the issue as Kennedy.

CIR Could Gain Traction in Senate

On the Democratic side, Senate Majority leader Harry Reid of Nevada, an ardent supporter of CIR, says he believes there is sufficient consensus within the Senate to move forward on immigration reform. Noting the almost complete agreement between Obama and McCain on the issue, Reid says he does not anticipate a significant challenge.

Given his experience and expertise on the issue, McCain will almost certainly be an important player on immigration. During the 2008 presidential campaign, McCain said the demise of immigration reform in 2007 was both a failure of the federal government as well as a personal failure for him—and that it must be a top agenda item in 2009.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in 2007 opposed and voted against the McCain-Kennedy bill, effectively killing it. Facing a more significant Democratic edge in the Senate this time, McConnell may have difficulty holding on to the filibuster-proof numbers Senate Republicans currently enjoy.

House Is More Polarized on Immigration Issues

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has failed to exude Reid's level of confidence, saying Democrats may need to sacrifice certain immigration priorities to garner bipartisan support. Pelosi has backtracked somewhat on her previous support for one such priority, namely providing a path to citizenship for those living here illegally.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) will also figure prominently in the debate. Lofgren is the chairperson of the House Subcommittee on Citizenship, Refugees, Immigration and Border Security. A former immigration attorney who represents San Jose and Silicon Valley, Lofgren has long supported CIR as well as an increase in the H-1B cap and elimination of permanent visa backlogs.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), an outspoken critic of the 2007 immigration reform bill, said it would "reward illegal immigrants who have consistently broken our laws." Boehner believes securing borders and stopping the flood of illegal immigration into the United States must be the first priority. He has voted against measures that would allow illegal immigrants to participate in Social Security, obtain driver's licenses and receive government benefits. Boehner has, however, endorsed measures aimed at increasing the H-1B cap.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), is another long-time critic of immigration reform that would grant a path to citizenship to illegal immigrants. He previously introduced legislation that would bar illegal aliens from obtaining driver's licenses and other government documents, instruct law enforcement to seek out illegal aliens, cut federal funding for cities with sanctuary laws, create a border fence and eliminate the diversity visa lottery.

Surge in Latino Vote May Push Immigration Reform

The 2008 election may have a profound impact on the prospects for immigration reform—not only because of who was elected, but because of who voted.

The number of Latinos who turned up at the polls in 2008 increased by 25 percent over 2004 and helped Democrats win in key battleground states, including Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada. Moreover, Hispanic votes cast nationwide for Democratic candidates increased by 14 percentage points, representing the biggest increase among any voting demographic. Notably, the number of naturalized immigrants who cast their ballots in 2008 rose substantially.

This seismic shift may represent something of a backlash against the anti-immigrant rhetoric and political strategies employed by some Republicans. Immigration largely failed as a wedge issue and in contests where immigration did become relevant, candidates on the anti-immigration side of the argument often found themselves on the losing end of the election. Bush himself warned that the GOP could lose further ground to Democrats if they continue to be seen as "anti-immigrant."

Given the support they received from Latino voters, Obama and the Democratic congress may now have a mandate to pass immigration reform or risk losing this important demographic in future elections.

Troubled Economy Could Help and Hurt Chances for CIR

As the U.S. economy slides deeper into recession and companies continue to lay off workers en masse, selling the public on immigration reform —particularly employment-based measures such as an increase in H-1B visas—may become an even more difficult proposition.

Americans will have to be convinced that immigration reform is part of the solution to our economic woes and not simply an effort to give increasingly scarce jobs to non-citizens. Obama appears ready to make such a case. As part of his plan for economic recovery, he has pledged his commitment to improving America's competitiveness in the technology sector and believes that immigration reform will be critical to this effort. He has said specifically that he believes improving the permanent and temporary visa programs (including H-1Bs) will help attract skilled workers and ultimately benefit American companies.

Ironically, a weakening economy could also prove to be a boon for CIR's prospects. Because illegal immigration is in many ways a product of supply and demand, the declining availability of jobs in the U.S. will likely lead to fewer people coming into the country illegally to find work.

A recent report by the Pew Hispanic Center shows that the flow of illegal immigrants into the country has slowed significantly over the past three years. If this trend continues and concerns over illegal immigration are tempered sufficiently, it may make immigration reform more palatable for the American public, despite the anemic economy.

Immigration Reform Achievable Under the Obama Administration

Immigration reform still faces significant hurdles. Since Obama has made it clear the economy, war in Iraq and health care will be his top priorities, immigration may take a back seat in the short term. In addition, finding support of any kind for foreign workers (legal or otherwise) in troubled economic times may be too politically risky an undertaking. Perhaps most importantly, a compromise on the divisive issue of illegal aliens will have to be reached in order for reform to be considered truly comprehensive.

There is, however, substantially increased momentum in this administration and Congress for reform of the country's immigration laws. Obama has publicly made immigration reform a priority and will likely expend some political capital to push for CIR. Meanwhile, in both the House and Senate, proponents of immigration reform are gaining ground on immigration restrictionists..

Given the political momentum in Congress that historically follows the inauguration of a new president, chances are good that a substantive immigration reform bill will be passed before mid-term elections. What provisions that bill will contain and what compromises proponents will make to win support is more difficult to predict.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com