Monday, April 06, 2009

Fidel Castro: Walking on Solid Ground

http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID={69D847E9-DFFE-4B8F-BD9B-3258E3A3B940})&language=EN

Fidel Castro: Walking on Solid Ground

Fidel Castro: Walking on Solid Ground

Havana, Apr 6 (Prensa Latina) Cuban Revolution leader Fidel Castro said he is certain that US Senator Richard G. Lugar doesn't fear the silliness of being described as soft or pro-socialist, for his proposal of beginning direct talks with the island's communist government.


In an article posted on Monday in the Cubadebate website, entitled "Walking on Solid Ground," Fidel Castro stated that "those who are capable of serenely analyzing the events, as is the case of the senator from Indiana, use an irrefutable argument: the United States' measures against Cuba, over almost half a century, are a total failure."


"There is no need to emphasize what Cuba has always said: we do not fear dialogue with the United States. Nor do we need the confrontation to exist as some foolish people think: we exist precisely because we believe in our ideas and we have never feared dialogue with the adversary," he noted.


"It is the only way to secure friendship and peace among peoples," Fidel Castro wrote. Prensa Latina is posting below the full text of Fidel Castro's reflection.


REFLECTIONS BY COMRADE FIDEL

WALKING ON SOLID GROUND


On April 2nd, while the G-20 Summit Meeting was beginning and ending in London, the well-known journalist of the influential Washington Post, Karen De Young, wrote: "Senator Richard G. Lugar called on President Obama to appoint a special envoy to initiate direct talks with the island's communist government.


"The nearly 50-year-old economic embargo against Cuba, Lugar (R-Ind.) said…puts the United States at odds with the views of the rest of Latin America, the European Union and the United Nations, and 'undermines our broader security and political interests in the Western Hemisphere.'


"The April 17-19 Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago would present a 'unique opportunity for you to build a more hospitable climate to advance U.S. interests in the region through a change in our posture regarding Cuba policy.'


"Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, -says Karen De Young- is in the forefront of a broad movement advocating a new policy that includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, a number of state governments and human rights groups.. A bipartisan majority of Congress has repeatedly voted to ease restrictions on travel and other contact with Cuba, although the measures died after threatened presidential vetoes during the Bush administration."


"Lugar is a co-sponsor of a bipartisan bill introduced in the Senate this week that would end all restrictions on travel to Cuba except in cases of war or direct threats to health or safety".


"Lugar said the appointment of an envoy and initiation of direct talks on subjects such as migration and drug interdiction would "serve vital U.S. security interests . . . and could ultimately create the conditions for meaningful discussion of more contentious subjects."


Karen's article expresses no doubt that the Indiana Senator is walking on solid ground. His starting point is not a philanthropic position. As she states, he is working with "the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, a number of state governments and human rights groups".


I am certain that Richard G. Lugar doesn't fear the silliness of being described as soft or pro-socialist.


If President Barack Obama travels the world asserting, as he did in his very own country, that it is necessary to invest the sums needed to pull out of the financial crisis, to guarantee the homes where countless families live, to guarantee jobs for the American workers who are becoming unemployed by the millions, to install health services and quality education for all citizens, how can he reconcile that with blockade measures to impose his will over a country like Cuba?


Today drugs are one of the most serious problems in this hemisphere and in Europe. In the war against drug trafficking and organized crime, encouraged in the enormous U.S. market, the Latin American countries are now losing almost ten thousand men each year, more than twice the number lost by the United States in the Iraq war.. The number grows and the problem is very far from being resolved.


That phenomenon does not exist in Cuba, a neighboring country close to the United States. On that thorny subject and in the war against illegal migration, the U.S. and Cuban coast guard services have been cooperating for many years. On the other hand, no American has ever died as the result of terrorist actions coming from our country, because such activities would not be tolerated.


The Cuban Revolution, which has not been destroyed either by the blockade or the dirty war, is based on ethical and political principles; that is the reason why it has been able to resist.


My aim is not to exhaust the subject. Far from it: in this reflection I am leaving out the damage inflicted on our country by the United States' arrogant attitude towards Cuba.


Those who are capable of serenely analyzing the events, as is the case of the senator from Indiana, use an irrefutable argument: the United States' measures against Cuba, over almost half a century, are a total failure.


There is no need to emphasize what Cuba has always said: we do not fear dialogue with the United States. Nor do we need the confrontation to exist as some foolish people think: we exist precisely because we believe in our ideas and we have never feared dialogue with the adversary. It is the only way to secure friendship and peace among peoples.


Fidel Castro Ruz

April 5, 2009

1:04 p.m.

/iff

PL-2

 

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com




Reflections of Fidel: The beginning of the Summit: Havana, April 3, 2009

http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2009/april/vier3/reflexiones..html

Havana.  April 3, 2009


Reflections of Fidel

The beginning of the Summit

(Taken from CubaDebate)

TODAY the G-20 Summit Meeting began. The experts on economic issues have made a tremendous effort. Some with experience in important international posts; others, as research scholars. The issue is a complex one, the language is new and demands familiarity with terms, economic data, international agencies and the political leaders of most weight in the international sphere. Hence the effort to simplify and explain intelligibly what is taking place in London, as I see it.


It is no surprise to anyone that Obama is the star of the London meeting. He represents the most powerful and richest country in the world. Special circumstances are in his favor. The lying, cynical, warmongering and odious Bush is not there. Neither is the mediocre and ignorant McCain, precisely thanks to the amazing victory of Obama, an African American in the country of racial discrimination, where a majority of white electors voted for McCain, although not enough to compensate for the votes of more than 90% of Black and mixed-race Americans, citizens of Latino origin, the poor and those affected by the crisis. He has just been elected at a point when other G-20 leaders are about to end their terms and Obama will be the probable president of the United States for eight years. Nobody finds it strange that the news from London revolves around him.


What is important for the world is what comes of there, if something does come out. All the attendees have their own national and even personal objectives, as political leaders who will be judged by history.


Obama's objective, in first place, is to change the image of his country, centrally responsible for the tragedy the world is enduring and which international opinion is rightly blaming for the current devastating economic crisis, for which he has no political responsibility whatsoever. As Joseph Stiglitz, former economic director of the International Monetary Fund and currently a professor at the Massachusetts Technological Institute points out: "He should come out and say that he is not to blame for anything and that he is trying to solve things as quickly as he can."


His principal European ally, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, is the Summit host and is unrestrainedly aspiring to change the current anti-Labour tendency unleashed by the blunders of his predecessor Tony Blair. Obama has been offered the honor of a visit to Buckingham Palace, where he was received with his wife Michelle. The president gave the veteran queen an iPod, fruit of sophisticated U.S. technology, with songs and images of the queen's state visit to the United States in 2007 and a book of sheet music signed by Richard Rogers. With Her Majesty he didn't have to exchange a single word on the worldly G-20 meeting.


On the other hand, Brown is staking all on the crisis. He is aspiring to change the rules of the banking system, promote economic growth, increase cooperation and do away with protectionism. He acknowledges that the negotiations will be difficult.


His slogan is "better to look forward rather than back." Clearly, if the electors looked back he wouldn't get many votes.


The desire of both allies at the heart of the G-20 is to minimize differences with France and Germany.


Sarkozy is making no attempt to conceal his displeasure with U.S. policy. He is explosive. He recently threatened to walk out of the meeting. Yesterday he informed the Europe 1 broadcasting station that, for now, there is no satisfactory agreement on the Summit, although he has softened his threats of walking out if there are no advances toward greater regulation. "I will not associate myself with a Summit that does not end with greater regulation." He states that the negotiators have not reached any agreement.


The Summit draft communiqué, already circulating among journalists, refers to measures to reestablish global growth, maintain market openings and stimulate global trade. "We have to obtain results, we have no choice," Sarkozy insisted yesterday.


Obama announced a few days ago that the United States proposes to introduce changes to its regulation and supervision system, in the hope that this statement would meet with one part of European demands, by snatching one its banners.


Sarkozy riposted that his undertaking to do away with tax havens is being taken seriously.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is very close to Sarkozy's positions, is demanding that the agreement should not even include a demand for a stimulus package for the advanced countries, neither should there be any debate on the announcement of a new international currency, the emerging countries' demand to the G-7.


"The word is at a crossroads," Merkel declared, "We have to do everything possible to avoid the crisis being repeated."


"We have to go further than what has been said in Washington," and she added that everything agreed in London must have a guarantee of implementation. "Not one place, not one product, not a single institution, should be left without supervision and transparency.."


Merkel indicated that she is in favor of raising IMF funds and increasing aid to developing countries, which are essentially suffering the impact of the crisis.


An increase in the resources of the International Monetary Fund would now seem be a fact. On his arrival in London, the Mexican president said that he was negotiating a credit line of 26 billion euros with the Fund. Yesterday, John Lipsky, the International Monetary Fund's No. 2, stated in London that the IMF is to facilitate a credit line of $47 billion to Mexico in order to guarantee the availability of liquidity in case the situation of the markets worsens because of the crisis. That is a larger sum than Mexico asked for.


As the United States holds the majority of IMF shares, such a credit would not be possible without its support, which also points to Obama's influence at the London Summit.


The news agencies reported that Obama is to meet in London with Dmitry Medvedev and Hu Jintao, the presidents of Russia and China, to discuss the thorny problems that both countries are confronting with the United States.


The bilateral meetings between the superpower and the two major powers will certainly cover economic problems, or perhaps patiently debated agreements, approved via their diplomatic representatives, will be announced.


Today, April 2, I read an extensive and detailed dispatch from the Xinhua news agency, datelined the 1st, noting that "Chinese President Hu Jintao and his U.S. counterpart Barack Obama agreed to work together to build a positive, cooperative and comprehensive relationship in the 21st century."


The two leaders decided to establish the mechanism of "China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogues…"


"The new commitment, made by the two heads of state during their meeting in London, will chart course for and give a strong boost to the sustained, sound and steady development of China-U.S. relations."


"China-U.S. relations remain one of the world's most important bilateral relationships in the 21st century, when mankind faces tremendous opportunities and challenges. In the new era, the two countries shoulder important responsibilities for world peace, stability and development and they also share broad common interests."


"Both sides should keep pace with the times and always handle bilateral relations from a strategic and long-term perspective."


"They should respect and take into consideration each other's core interests, and seize the opportunities and work together to meet the challenges in the century."


"The establishment of the China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogues mechanism is an important step to further advance their bilateral relations. With that, the previous strategic dialogue between the two countries has been upgraded to a new level."


"At a time when the international financial crisis continues to spread, it is in the primary common interests of China and the United States that the two countries support each other and work together to ride out the storm."


"China and the United States should not only enhance exchange and cooperation in such fields as economy, the fight against terrorism, proliferation and transnational crimes, climate change, energy and the environment, but also strengthen communication and coordination on regional and global issues."


Such an agreement cannot be discussed in a 60-minute meeting. It was already drafted with all the details.


China, whose current allies on the Asian continent invaded and plundered it barely 70 years ago, is now advancing toward a peak position in the global economy.


It is the principal creditor of the United States and is serenely discussing with the president of that powerful country the rules that are to govern relations between the two countries in a world impregnated with risks.


Maybe the Xinhua dispatch is transmitting one of the most important news items in relation to the G-20 Summit.


It began and ended today while I was writing these lines! Amazing!

Fidel Castro Ruz
April 2, 2009
3:07 p.m.

Translated by Granma International

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com




Sunday, April 05, 2009

Texas Mayor Caught in Deportation Furor: NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/05/us/05immig.html?ref=us

April 5, 2009 ~See Multi-Media @ Websource

Texas Mayor Caught in Deportation Furor

IRVING, Tex. — Just after sunrise one morning last summer, as his two sons hurried out the door to school, Oscar Urbina might have presented a portrait of domestic stability in this Dallas suburb, a 35-year-old man with a nice home, a thriving family and a steady contracting job.


But a few weeks earlier, after buying a Dodge Ram truck at a local dealership, he had been summoned back to deal with some paperwork problems. And shortly after he arrived, so did the police, who arrested him on charges of using a false Social Security number.


Mr. Urbina does not deny it; he has been living illegally in the Dallas area since coming to the country from Mexico in 1993. But the turn of events stunned him in a once-welcoming place where people had never paid much attention to Social Security numbers.


If the arrest had come earlier, it might have had little effect on his life. But two years ago, Irving made a decision, championed by its first-term mayor, Herbert A. Gears, to conduct immigration checks on everyone booked into the local jail. So Mr. Urbina was automatically referred to the federal authorities and now faces possible deportation, becoming one of more than 4,000 illegal immigrants here who have ended up in similar circumstances.


As battles over illegal immigration rage around the country, Irving's crackdown is not unusual in itself. What makes it striking is that it happened with the blessing of a mayor like Mr. Gears, an immigrant-friendly Democrat with deep political ties to the city's Hispanic leaders, a man who likes to preach that adapting to immigration — especially in a city like his, now almost half-Hispanic — is not a burden but an opportunity, or as he says, it's "not a have-to, it's a get-to."


But as a wave of sentiment against illegal immigration built around Dallas and the nation, Mr. Gears came to realize that his city would be unable to remain on the sidelines — and that his own political future would depend on how he navigated newly treacherous terrain.

Irving is one of a growing number of cities across America where immigration control, a federal prerogative, is reshaping politics at the other end of the spectrum, the local level, in the absence of a national policy overhaul. To watch its experiment play out over the better part of the past year in City Hall and in its residents' lives is to see how difficult political moderation has become in the debate over what to do with the country's estimated 12 million illegal immigrants.


Irving's jail program was started by the city's police chief as an experiment with federal immigration officials. But Mr. Gears saw in it a kind of release valve for the political pressure building around him, which had been energized by much more aggressive measures to force out illegal immigrants in Farmers Branch, a smaller suburb next door.


"I let my instincts rule the moment in that instance," he said. "What weighed heavily in my thoughts is that if we didn't do something, a lot more immigrants were going to be hurt."


"And now," Mr. Gears added ruefully, "I'm the hero of every redneck in America."

Nationally, most of the attention in the immigration fight has centered on smaller cities that have taken a hard line on illegal immigration, like Farmers Branch and Hazleton, Pa., or on cities that have moved to protect illegal immigrants, like San Francisco and New Haven.


Irving is one of the places with a growing percentage of illegal immigrants that has tried to take — Mr. Gears's critics say has stumbled upon — a much less explored middle road.

As a first-ring suburb whose non-Hispanic white population has slipped from the majority in the last few years, Irving describes itself as a multicultural community. Under Mr. Gears, it recently opened a hospital clinic that caters to low-income patients, many of them Hispanic, and gave $100,000 to support its fledgling Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.


But even as it was doing so, its policy on immigration checks prompted the Mexican consul in Dallas to issue an unusual warning to Mexican immigrants to stay clear of Irving. And businesses both Hispanic-owned and not, including Wal-Mart, began howling to the mayor that fear was driving away Hispanic customers.


Mr. Gears, 46, is a big, gregarious, politically agile Texan who won re-election last May against an opponent whose campaign promised much tougher immigration measures. The mayor describes the rise of such sentiment around him as disturbing, a manifestation of "domestic extremism," and he derides its adherents as "the crankies."


"We defeated the crankies, and no one thought we could," Mr. Gears said of his re-election. "We've defined what our responsibility is, and that's only to allow the federal government to do its job. It's not our responsibility to evaluate it or assess whether it's good or not."


Mr. Gears happened to be making these points in a booth at his favorite local bar, where he was being served by his favorite waitress, a friendly mother of five — in the country illegally — whom he has known for years and tips lavishly to help her make ends meet.

He acknowledges that Irving's policy, whose chief goal is to get rid of dangerous criminals who are in the country illegally, has resulted in "casualties," with many people deported as a result of lesser, nonviolent offenses like driving without a license or insurance.


The police chief, Larry Boyd, said he believed that the city's enviable crime rate (last year was its lowest on record) is at least partly due to the deportation program. "You will never hear me blaming Irving's crime problems on illegal immigration," Chief Boyd said. But he added that the program "keeps some criminals off of Irving's streets longer and potentially keeps them off of Irving's streets for good."


The city's political straddle on immigration has angered and confounded Mr. Gears's opponents. Critics to the right accuse him of opportunism and of shirking his duty to legal residents. Advocates for the immigrants accuse him essentially of undercutting them.

But Mr. Gears's position is one he seems to struggle every day to defend, said Carlos Quintanilla, a vocal advocate who, like many other Hispanic leaders, initially supported the jail program but now deplores it.


"I call Herb the most tormented man in America," Mr. Quintanilla said.

The Hard-liners


Lucia Rottenberg, an Irving resident for almost 40 years, was upset in June 2007 when she stood at a City Council meeting in the amphitheater-like chambers at City Hall. Citing fears of crime, disease and economic harm to her city, Ms. Rottenberg called for tougher measures against illegal immigrants and bragged that her husband used his vacation time to volunteer with the Texas Minutemen, a contentious civilian group that tries to keep people from crossing the border illegally.


As she turned to leave the lectern, Mr. Gears leaned into his microphone and stopped her.

"I need to clear something up, because I was told something that was disturbing," he said. "Were you at a meeting, a club meeting, where applause was given to the comment that anyone who comes over the border should be shot?"


Ms. Rottenberg, who has contributed to one of Mr. Gears's campaigns and whom Mr. Gears said he considers a friend, confirmed she was at the meeting. "I don't remember if there was applause or not," she said, taken aback.


"Did you make that remark?" Mr. Gears asked..


"Yes, I did," she admitted, her voice rising. "And my frustration is this — "


Mr. Gears cut her short: "You don't have to explain it to me. I understand."

It was at that Council session that the city adopted the federal cooperation program for residency checks inside the jail. It was also a public turning point in the political reorientation of Mr. Gears, who spoke volubly, sometimes irascibly, in defense of the checks while trying to shame those he saw as using immigration to divide the city further.

"I viewed it as something that would be painful to some, and so that was distasteful to me," Mr. Gears said later about the jail policy. "But we were in a battle here on this issue."


Like many Texas cities its size, Irving was mostly white a generation ago, a farming town turned sprawling suburb as middle-class families flocked to its affordable neighborhoods.

In 1970, when the city's population hit 100,000, the Census estimated that less than 5 percent was Hispanic. By 1990 the percentage had tripled, during the next decade it doubled, and it is now thought to be 45 percent or higher. In the fall of 2008, the last time a count was taken, 70 percent of the students enrolled in kindergarten through fifth grade in Irving's schools were Hispanic.


While no one knows exactly how much of that increase was a result of illegal immigration, Irving was one of several Dallas suburbs that experienced a huge influx of illegal workers as part of the wave that has tripled the nation's illegal population since 1996. Officials estimate that more than 20 percent of Irving's 200,000 residents may be in the country illegally.


A drive down North Belt Line Road, one of the city's commercial spines, takes a visitor past a big Kroger grocery store whose next-door neighbor is a La Michoacana Meat Market almost its equal in size. Both stores sit not far from dozens of Hispanic restaurants, laundries, stores, auto-repair garages and curanderas, or psychics' shops, scattered throughout the city's south side.


Some white, longtime Irving residents say illegal immigration has done much more to erode than bolster the city's older shopping strips and neighborhoods, its image and its property values. They complain to Mr. Gears about white flight from the Irving Mall and about well-kept older residential blocks marred by "patrón houses," overcrowded single-family homes, clustered with cars, used as bunkhouses for illegal workers.


Beth Van Duyne, a city councilwoman who advocates tougher immigration policies and has battled Mr. Gears, likes to show visitors a favorite exhibit in her case, a hulking big-box store that was once a Wal-Mart. It is now called Irving Bazaar, a battered flea-market-like assortment of merchants with handmade window advertisements in Spanish for wrestling matches and cheap jewelry.


"People hate it," Ms. Van Duyne said. "It's just not a good thing to have in your city."

Such discontent had been rising for years, though as recently as 2005, when Mr. Gears was elected to his first term, it remained well below the political surface. Sue Richardson, the vice president of the Greater Irving Republican Club and probably Mr. Gears's most persistent opponent, said she believed that it had finally risen into view because many people realized Irving was in the midst of a "silent invasion" from Mexico.


"The people who come here illegally across the border are not educated people," Ms. Richardson said. "They don't have any culture or any respect for ours.."

A Political Career


Arriving one fall morning at a regular kaffeeklatsch of longtime residents — a mostly white group that once held court in a diner but, since it closed, has moved to a Mexican restaurant — Mr. Gears made his way around the table shaking hands and telling jokes. "This is where I cut my teeth," he said. "These are the people who really run the place."

He looks and often plays the part of a good old boy, a flamboyant dresser with flashy gold-rimmed eyeglasses and rings and cufflinks embossed with pictures of Elizabeth Taylor, who reminds him of his mother when she was young. Mr. Gears's stamina and self-confidence as a talker can evoke a combination of used-car salesman and Southern Baptist preacher, though his fondness for vodka, Marlboro reds and easygoing profanity might disqualify him from the pulpit.


"You're going to think I'm making this up, but I was known as Bubba when I was young," he said. "Now when I go back to the country they call me Mayor Bubba."


Mr. Gears makes a comfortable living running a financial consulting firm with his wife. But he owes his political career to the poor and the working class, both Hispanic and not. A pivotal issue in his first City Council campaign (the contests are nonpartisan, though Mr. Gears describes himself as a conservative Democrat) was his support for beleaguered mobile home residents, and the "trailer-house vote," as he likes to call it, made the difference.


He could readily identify with those voters. He was born in East Texas to a deeply troubled mother who raised him and his two sisters mostly by herself while wrestling with poverty and drug addiction; she committed suicide at 63.


Mr. Gears clearly relishes the political life and thrives in it. He raised almost $100,000 in contributions in last year's mayoral race, a huge sum for such suburban contests. But he says he has no higher political aspirations than perhaps to serve another term or two as mayor. He jokes that "the Democrats wouldn't have me — especially now — and I wouldn't have the Republicans." Still, he counts among his backers powerful and wealthy real-estate developers, and his political options remain open.


In public, Mr. Gears reveals few hints of the internal turmoil that friends describe. His oldest Hispanic friends say they understand why he supports the jail policy but add that the position has always sat uncomfortably on the shoulders of a man who has long worked for Hispanic causes, including serving as president of a local nonprofit group that helps immigrants.


"I think the world of Herb," said Platon Lerma, who is considered the grandfather of Irving's Hispanic activists. But Mr. Lerma, 82, said he believed that the immigration checks had betrayed the mayor's ideals.


"To me the program itself is a crime, in human terms," he said. "We're breaking up families. We're not doing right in the eyes of God."


But in the next breath he added that Mr. Gears had simply chosen "the best of several evils." Hispanic residents of Irving do not vote in large numbers, Mr. Lerma explained, and it had become apparent that too many other voters were clamoring for immigration change.


If the election last year had gone to Mr. Gears's closest opponent, a lawyer, Roland Jeter — who had warned that Irving was becoming a "sanctuary city" for illegal immigrants — it would have almost certainly sent the city down a more stringent path.


In his campaign, Mr. Jeter advocated joining a federal program that deputizes police officers as immigration agents. The program has resulted in large numbers of deportations in other cities, and has sometimes led them to initiate other aggressive measures to round up illegal immigrants.


Still, even the more passive approach taken by Irving soon became unpopular among Hispanics. In 2006, before the systematic jail checks began, local police officers were handing about 300 people a year to the federal government for immigration reasons. By the summer of 2007, as many as 300 people a month were entering immigration proceedings, and Mr. Quintanilla, the Hispanic advocate who only three months earlier had spoken in support of the policy at the City Council hearing, helped organize protests against it.


Mr. Gears soon found himself defending the approach on national television while trying to deflect blame toward those he believes are responsible for the problem.


"The complaint that people have with this program," he said on CNN, "should be directed at the federal government."


Restive Allies


Now, nearly a year after his re-election, Mr. Gears is still vilified by his conservative opponents while also facing a simmering rebellion from Mr. Quintanilla and other Hispanic leaders, who say the jail policy has unnecessarily damaged the lives of people who have had no serious run-ins with the law.


As of early March, of the 4,074 people whose arrest led to their being handed over to immigration officials, 129 had been charged with violent crimes or illegal possession of weapons, and 714 with other types of serious felonies. In addition, 579 had been charged with driving while intoxicated. The other 2,625 had been arrested for lesser offenses; the largest categories were public intoxication and not having a driver's license or insurance.

If he were in charge of changing federal policy, Mr. Gears said, he would find a way to allow many illegal immigrants to move toward citizenship. It is a goal that was sought by President George W. Bush and now, in a similar plan, by President Obama.


For now, Mr. Gears is still smiling, still talking and still trying to be the mayor of all of Irving's inhabitants, even those he knows might soon be gone, like Mr. Urbina, the illegal immigrant who now awaits a deportation hearing.


Not long before Mr. Urbina's arrest, the mayor tossed out the first pitch at the opening of a Pony Baseball World Series for 9- and 10-year-olds, who had come to town from places as far away as Puerto Rico and Mexico. The event felt like a United Nations game, with national flags and food and blaring music. "Isn't this great?" Mr.. Gears said. "This is what Irving's all about."


Using his scant Spanish to throw around the occasional greeting, the mayor took his place on the field in his French-cuffed shirt, sweating alongside players from one of Irving's teams, their names spelled out on the backs of their jerseys: Gomez, Conaway, Aleman, Shastid, Riker, Flores, Herrin, Childress, Ehrke, Rodriguez.


As the strains of the Puerto Rican anthem faded from the loudspeakers, Mr. Gears took the mound and wound up. His pitch was low, but the catcher scooped it up from the dirt, and the mayor walked off to generous applause.


"Fighting him is kind of like fighting against your brother," Mr. Quintanilla said of his friend the mayor. "But you put your guard down, and the first thing you know you're being hit in the face."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com


Camilo Torres: Prayer Can’t Solve Poverty Alone: by COHA Research Associate Carolina Farias

http://www.coha.org/2009/04/camilo-torres-prayer-can%E2%80%99t-solve-poverty-alone/

Camilo Torres: Prayer Can't Solve Poverty Alone

http://www.colombia.com/actualidad/images/2007/especiales/eln/camilo_torres1.jpg


There is always someone who is trying to improve society and seek better living standards by challenging the status quo, promoting freedom, and believing that social conditions can really be changed. Camilo Torres Restrepo, dubbed the "revolutionary priest" by his followers, struggled throughout his life to translate the canons of Liberation Theology into action. The second Vatican Council established the germs of Liberation Theology's ideas in 1962. Through this framework, Camilo Torres proposed a political, social and economic paradigm shift, which in 1965 served to inspire the emergence of the National Liberation Army (ELN), a Colombian left-wing guerrilla group. Soon after the ELN was founded, Torres joined it and became its political face.


Born in 1929 in Bogotá, Torres' extraordinary intelligence and academic preparation were catalyzed in part by his prominent family's origins and access to education. He lived with his parents Calixto Torres Umaña and Isabel Restrepo Gaviria in Europe between 1931 and 1934. After they divorced, he returned to Colombia with his mother and finished his studies. Soon after graduating, Torres took his vows and joined the Roman Catholic Church as a priest in 1954.


Once he was ordained, Torres was sent to Belgium's Pontifical Catholic University of Leuven, where he wrote his thesis, "The proletarian Tendencies in Bogotá", which was published posthumously in Colombia in 1987. Afterwards, Torres started on his intensive academic research and produced studies about Colombia's complex social situation, including surveys of urbanization, living standards, land reform, political violence and democracy. Torres' emphasis on social development in Bogotá led him to become engaged in a number of academic projects in the Tunjuelito neighborhood, one of the poorest in the capital city.


By 1959, Torres had joined the National University of Colombia, where he co-founded the sociology faculty with Orlando Fals Borda, a notable researcher, academic, and sociologist, who at this time was very popular in the social sciences. Besides his intelligence, Torres' charming personality as a professor as well as in his relations with students, transformed him into an instant leader committed to creating a good society, whether it was at the National University of Colombia, in the Catholic Church, or among the greater community.


The "revolutionary priest", as he came to be known, was unique for his time, because he encouraged poor people to reflect on the origins of poverty and then refuse to accept their condition as God-given. As Torres was to preach, "People don't happen to be poor; their poverty is largely a product of the way society is organized." Subsequently, Torres started to promulgate political activism among students, peasants, and slum dwellers.

As a predecessor of the blooming of Liberation Theology, Torres tirelessly spread its tenets. The preferential "Option for the poor" projected the church as a social and political institution and proposed that bishops become analysts concerning social issues. Within Colombia, the prominence of Liberation Theology became widespread, as numerous religious organizations began examining the social, economic and political structures sustaining poverty. The movement, however, prompted opposition from some of the more powerful divisions of the Catholic Church, particularly among the upper hierarchies.


Liberation Theology was strongly criticized at the time by Cardinal Luis Concha of Bogotá, premiere of the Colombian Church, who argued that the "new spring time", as he called the reform, would cause the erosion of Catholic values and the loss of influence of the Church in the western world. In this debate, Cardinal Concha and Camilo Torres were always antagonists. This was most noticeable in September of 1964, when Torres returned to Leuven to attend the Episcopal Theology Congress. During the meeting, he declared that Christians should cooperate with Marxists because they were both seeking change within social structures, not exclusively by praying, but also as a result of providing support to poor and laboring people.


Consequently, Camilo Torres gradually moved from academic studies within the pale of the Catholic Church, into political activism. He employed his previous intellectual investigations to address the violence found in Colombia's rural territories, and then helped in the founding of the country's trade union and various socialist movements. While Torres traveled around the city of Santander teaching and spreading his vision through political speeches, he was surrounded by peasants, workers and students. At the same time, he was developing contacts with the leftist guerilla group, the National Liberation Army (ELN). In July 1965, he traveled to Santander for a meeting with Fabio Vasquez Castaño, ELN's commander-in-chief.


After this meeting, Torres became linked to the ELN as a political figure spreading a combination of his own revolutionary beliefs and those of the liberation army. He created a weekly newspaper, which sold 45,000 copies on its first day of publication. He expressed his ideals through his writings and his speeches, which fostered a growing social and political following. In fact, the occasion of his speeches routinely filled public squares throughout the country. He attracted the passionate interest not only of average Colombians but also of various politicians from different backgrounds, who, on more than one occasion, attempted to use his performances to gain votes for themselves.


Eventually, the Colombian Army determined that Torres was tied to the ELN, and he was ordered by the group's leaders to end his above ground political work and to join in the guerrilla struggle. On February 16, 1966, he was killed in his first encounter with the security forces. After his death, Torres was accorded many titles, such as "hero," "revolutionary priest," and "martyr." Thus, it is not easy to define an exclusive perspective for Camilo Torres in the pages of Latin America's history. Rather, his many roles make the matter more complex. There is a possibility that any attempted biography would miss something about this amazing character due to the scores of interpretations that can be made of his actions.


Camilo Torres' story remains vibrant inspiration for Colombian youth to join progressive social movements today. Unfortunately, while the ELN initially followed Torres' principles, it since has deteriorated to at times senselessly killing innocent people and has engaged in the same kind of extortion and kidnapping as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) has intermittently wrought upon the country throughout the last 30 years. Even though Torres brought theory into practice by developing powerful social analysis, and involved citizens of all backgrounds behind his cause, a peaceful creed of this canon has not yet been realized. Today, the ELN and the FARC, let alone the particularly brutal vigilante force, the AUC, as well as the country's abusive security forces, all have denigrated Torres' principles by killing the very Colombians they mechanically profess to protect.


http://www.icdc.com/%7Epaulwolf/colombia/torres1.jpg

http://cuban1.sweb.cz/big_cuban1/0043.jpg
http://cuban1.sweb.cz/ ~PSL

This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Carolina Farias
April 1st, 2009
Word Count: 1100

 

Long Live Camilo! Que Viva Camilo!

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com