Monday, April 06, 2009

An accurate count of Latinos

http://www.impre.com/eldiariony/opinion/2009/4/6/an-accurate-count-of-latinos-118051-1.html
volver arriba

Census day will take place in a year. But if the Obama administration doesn't take steps to protect this enumeration, Latinos and other groups will be at risk of an undercount.

The U.S. Census Bureau is charged with ensuring an accurate count. Last week, President Obama nominated Robert Groves, who, if confirmed, has to hit the ground running to deal with a slew of issues – some old, others new.


Among the persistent problems is the undercount of certain groups. In 2000, the Census count missed 4.5 million people, most of who were black or Hispanic. The count will be further complicated by the displacement triggered by the foreclosure crisis.


The Constitution mandates that every 10 years, each person living in the country, regardless of immigration status, must be counted. The Census determines the distribution of federal funds and the number of congressional districts within states. But an environment in which immigrant families are in fear of raids and deportation threatens to undermine an accurate representation of communities throughout the country.

Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, whose department oversees the bureau, has spoken to protecting the confidentiality of census forms. But the Obama administration has to take a step further.


During the 2000 census, large-scaled immigration raids were paused so that people would not be fearful of responding to the census. Congressman William Macy Clay has said he will push for the same policy.


The Census Bureau requested a halt a couple of years ago but the Bush administration rejected that request. Obama can, and should, depart from that shortsighted decision.

Education for Liberation!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta

Sacramento, California, Aztlan
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CASA-12-Steps-Program/



Bishop retirements present opportunities

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/04/05/Bishop-retirements-present-opportunities/UPI-25431238948753/

Bishop retirements present opportunities


LOS ANGELES, April 5 (UPI) -- The Vatican will have a big opportunity to reshape the U.S. Catholic Church with the looming retirements of many bishops, observers say.

The opening of so many top positions could be used to help erase the trauma of priest sexual abuse that has plagued the church in recent years and to better connect with the growing numbers of immigrant church-goers, the Los Angeles Times reported.

One example could be the country's largest archdiocese in Los Angeles, where the pending retirement of Cardinal Roger Mahony, 73, could result in the appointment of the first U.S. Latino cardinal. The Times quoted church observers as saying three Latinos, two from California, are being considered as possible successors to Mahony.


Other influential Catholic prelates reportedly nearing retirements or resignations include Chicago Cardinal Francis George, 72, and Philadelphia Cardinal Justin Rigali, 73, who is a member of the Vatican body that recommends bishop candidates to the pope.

"So much of that fresh start depends on how the successor handles the problems" in each diocese, Rev. Anthony Pogorelc, a sociologist of religion at the Catholic University of America, told the Times. "It will depend on transparency."


© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 

Education for Liberation! Seize the Time! Join Up! Get involved! Take a leap of faith!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta

Sacramento, California, Aztlan
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/


Fidel Castro: Walking on Solid Ground

http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID={69D847E9-DFFE-4B8F-BD9B-3258E3A3B940})&language=EN

Fidel Castro: Walking on Solid Ground

Fidel Castro: Walking on Solid Ground

Havana, Apr 6 (Prensa Latina) Cuban Revolution leader Fidel Castro said he is certain that US Senator Richard G. Lugar doesn't fear the silliness of being described as soft or pro-socialist, for his proposal of beginning direct talks with the island's communist government.


In an article posted on Monday in the Cubadebate website, entitled "Walking on Solid Ground," Fidel Castro stated that "those who are capable of serenely analyzing the events, as is the case of the senator from Indiana, use an irrefutable argument: the United States' measures against Cuba, over almost half a century, are a total failure."


"There is no need to emphasize what Cuba has always said: we do not fear dialogue with the United States. Nor do we need the confrontation to exist as some foolish people think: we exist precisely because we believe in our ideas and we have never feared dialogue with the adversary," he noted.


"It is the only way to secure friendship and peace among peoples," Fidel Castro wrote. Prensa Latina is posting below the full text of Fidel Castro's reflection.


REFLECTIONS BY COMRADE FIDEL

WALKING ON SOLID GROUND


On April 2nd, while the G-20 Summit Meeting was beginning and ending in London, the well-known journalist of the influential Washington Post, Karen De Young, wrote: "Senator Richard G. Lugar called on President Obama to appoint a special envoy to initiate direct talks with the island's communist government.


"The nearly 50-year-old economic embargo against Cuba, Lugar (R-Ind.) said…puts the United States at odds with the views of the rest of Latin America, the European Union and the United Nations, and 'undermines our broader security and political interests in the Western Hemisphere.'


"The April 17-19 Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago would present a 'unique opportunity for you to build a more hospitable climate to advance U.S. interests in the region through a change in our posture regarding Cuba policy.'


"Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, -says Karen De Young- is in the forefront of a broad movement advocating a new policy that includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, a number of state governments and human rights groups.. A bipartisan majority of Congress has repeatedly voted to ease restrictions on travel and other contact with Cuba, although the measures died after threatened presidential vetoes during the Bush administration."


"Lugar is a co-sponsor of a bipartisan bill introduced in the Senate this week that would end all restrictions on travel to Cuba except in cases of war or direct threats to health or safety".


"Lugar said the appointment of an envoy and initiation of direct talks on subjects such as migration and drug interdiction would "serve vital U.S. security interests . . . and could ultimately create the conditions for meaningful discussion of more contentious subjects."


Karen's article expresses no doubt that the Indiana Senator is walking on solid ground. His starting point is not a philanthropic position. As she states, he is working with "the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, a number of state governments and human rights groups".


I am certain that Richard G. Lugar doesn't fear the silliness of being described as soft or pro-socialist.


If President Barack Obama travels the world asserting, as he did in his very own country, that it is necessary to invest the sums needed to pull out of the financial crisis, to guarantee the homes where countless families live, to guarantee jobs for the American workers who are becoming unemployed by the millions, to install health services and quality education for all citizens, how can he reconcile that with blockade measures to impose his will over a country like Cuba?


Today drugs are one of the most serious problems in this hemisphere and in Europe. In the war against drug trafficking and organized crime, encouraged in the enormous U.S. market, the Latin American countries are now losing almost ten thousand men each year, more than twice the number lost by the United States in the Iraq war.. The number grows and the problem is very far from being resolved.


That phenomenon does not exist in Cuba, a neighboring country close to the United States. On that thorny subject and in the war against illegal migration, the U.S. and Cuban coast guard services have been cooperating for many years. On the other hand, no American has ever died as the result of terrorist actions coming from our country, because such activities would not be tolerated.


The Cuban Revolution, which has not been destroyed either by the blockade or the dirty war, is based on ethical and political principles; that is the reason why it has been able to resist.


My aim is not to exhaust the subject. Far from it: in this reflection I am leaving out the damage inflicted on our country by the United States' arrogant attitude towards Cuba.


Those who are capable of serenely analyzing the events, as is the case of the senator from Indiana, use an irrefutable argument: the United States' measures against Cuba, over almost half a century, are a total failure.


There is no need to emphasize what Cuba has always said: we do not fear dialogue with the United States. Nor do we need the confrontation to exist as some foolish people think: we exist precisely because we believe in our ideas and we have never feared dialogue with the adversary. It is the only way to secure friendship and peace among peoples.


Fidel Castro Ruz

April 5, 2009

1:04 p.m.

/iff

PL-2

 

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo..com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com




Reflections of Fidel: The beginning of the Summit: Havana, April 3, 2009

http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2009/april/vier3/reflexiones..html

Havana.  April 3, 2009


Reflections of Fidel

The beginning of the Summit

(Taken from CubaDebate)

TODAY the G-20 Summit Meeting began. The experts on economic issues have made a tremendous effort. Some with experience in important international posts; others, as research scholars. The issue is a complex one, the language is new and demands familiarity with terms, economic data, international agencies and the political leaders of most weight in the international sphere. Hence the effort to simplify and explain intelligibly what is taking place in London, as I see it.


It is no surprise to anyone that Obama is the star of the London meeting. He represents the most powerful and richest country in the world. Special circumstances are in his favor. The lying, cynical, warmongering and odious Bush is not there. Neither is the mediocre and ignorant McCain, precisely thanks to the amazing victory of Obama, an African American in the country of racial discrimination, where a majority of white electors voted for McCain, although not enough to compensate for the votes of more than 90% of Black and mixed-race Americans, citizens of Latino origin, the poor and those affected by the crisis. He has just been elected at a point when other G-20 leaders are about to end their terms and Obama will be the probable president of the United States for eight years. Nobody finds it strange that the news from London revolves around him.


What is important for the world is what comes of there, if something does come out. All the attendees have their own national and even personal objectives, as political leaders who will be judged by history.


Obama's objective, in first place, is to change the image of his country, centrally responsible for the tragedy the world is enduring and which international opinion is rightly blaming for the current devastating economic crisis, for which he has no political responsibility whatsoever. As Joseph Stiglitz, former economic director of the International Monetary Fund and currently a professor at the Massachusetts Technological Institute points out: "He should come out and say that he is not to blame for anything and that he is trying to solve things as quickly as he can."


His principal European ally, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, is the Summit host and is unrestrainedly aspiring to change the current anti-Labour tendency unleashed by the blunders of his predecessor Tony Blair. Obama has been offered the honor of a visit to Buckingham Palace, where he was received with his wife Michelle. The president gave the veteran queen an iPod, fruit of sophisticated U.S. technology, with songs and images of the queen's state visit to the United States in 2007 and a book of sheet music signed by Richard Rogers. With Her Majesty he didn't have to exchange a single word on the worldly G-20 meeting.


On the other hand, Brown is staking all on the crisis. He is aspiring to change the rules of the banking system, promote economic growth, increase cooperation and do away with protectionism. He acknowledges that the negotiations will be difficult.


His slogan is "better to look forward rather than back." Clearly, if the electors looked back he wouldn't get many votes.


The desire of both allies at the heart of the G-20 is to minimize differences with France and Germany.


Sarkozy is making no attempt to conceal his displeasure with U.S. policy. He is explosive. He recently threatened to walk out of the meeting. Yesterday he informed the Europe 1 broadcasting station that, for now, there is no satisfactory agreement on the Summit, although he has softened his threats of walking out if there are no advances toward greater regulation. "I will not associate myself with a Summit that does not end with greater regulation." He states that the negotiators have not reached any agreement.


The Summit draft communiqué, already circulating among journalists, refers to measures to reestablish global growth, maintain market openings and stimulate global trade. "We have to obtain results, we have no choice," Sarkozy insisted yesterday.


Obama announced a few days ago that the United States proposes to introduce changes to its regulation and supervision system, in the hope that this statement would meet with one part of European demands, by snatching one its banners.


Sarkozy riposted that his undertaking to do away with tax havens is being taken seriously.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is very close to Sarkozy's positions, is demanding that the agreement should not even include a demand for a stimulus package for the advanced countries, neither should there be any debate on the announcement of a new international currency, the emerging countries' demand to the G-7.


"The word is at a crossroads," Merkel declared, "We have to do everything possible to avoid the crisis being repeated."


"We have to go further than what has been said in Washington," and she added that everything agreed in London must have a guarantee of implementation. "Not one place, not one product, not a single institution, should be left without supervision and transparency.."


Merkel indicated that she is in favor of raising IMF funds and increasing aid to developing countries, which are essentially suffering the impact of the crisis.


An increase in the resources of the International Monetary Fund would now seem be a fact. On his arrival in London, the Mexican president said that he was negotiating a credit line of 26 billion euros with the Fund. Yesterday, John Lipsky, the International Monetary Fund's No. 2, stated in London that the IMF is to facilitate a credit line of $47 billion to Mexico in order to guarantee the availability of liquidity in case the situation of the markets worsens because of the crisis. That is a larger sum than Mexico asked for.


As the United States holds the majority of IMF shares, such a credit would not be possible without its support, which also points to Obama's influence at the London Summit.


The news agencies reported that Obama is to meet in London with Dmitry Medvedev and Hu Jintao, the presidents of Russia and China, to discuss the thorny problems that both countries are confronting with the United States.


The bilateral meetings between the superpower and the two major powers will certainly cover economic problems, or perhaps patiently debated agreements, approved via their diplomatic representatives, will be announced.


Today, April 2, I read an extensive and detailed dispatch from the Xinhua news agency, datelined the 1st, noting that "Chinese President Hu Jintao and his U.S. counterpart Barack Obama agreed to work together to build a positive, cooperative and comprehensive relationship in the 21st century."


The two leaders decided to establish the mechanism of "China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogues…"


"The new commitment, made by the two heads of state during their meeting in London, will chart course for and give a strong boost to the sustained, sound and steady development of China-U.S. relations."


"China-U.S. relations remain one of the world's most important bilateral relationships in the 21st century, when mankind faces tremendous opportunities and challenges. In the new era, the two countries shoulder important responsibilities for world peace, stability and development and they also share broad common interests."


"Both sides should keep pace with the times and always handle bilateral relations from a strategic and long-term perspective."


"They should respect and take into consideration each other's core interests, and seize the opportunities and work together to meet the challenges in the century."


"The establishment of the China-U.S. Strategic and Economic Dialogues mechanism is an important step to further advance their bilateral relations. With that, the previous strategic dialogue between the two countries has been upgraded to a new level."


"At a time when the international financial crisis continues to spread, it is in the primary common interests of China and the United States that the two countries support each other and work together to ride out the storm."


"China and the United States should not only enhance exchange and cooperation in such fields as economy, the fight against terrorism, proliferation and transnational crimes, climate change, energy and the environment, but also strengthen communication and coordination on regional and global issues."


Such an agreement cannot be discussed in a 60-minute meeting. It was already drafted with all the details.


China, whose current allies on the Asian continent invaded and plundered it barely 70 years ago, is now advancing toward a peak position in the global economy.


It is the principal creditor of the United States and is serenely discussing with the president of that powerful country the rules that are to govern relations between the two countries in a world impregnated with risks.


Maybe the Xinhua dispatch is transmitting one of the most important news items in relation to the G-20 Summit.


It began and ended today while I was writing these lines! Amazing!

Fidel Castro Ruz
April 2, 2009
3:07 p.m.

Translated by Granma International

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 

Education for Liberation! Join Up!
Peter S. Lopez aka: Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

http://www.NetworkAztlan.com