Friday, June 05, 2009

Key Link: The President’s Speech in Cairo: A New Beginning

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/obamaforamerica/gGGGhZ

The President's Speech in Cairo: A New Beginning

Here's the full video of President Obama's speech in Cairo this morning:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaxZPiiKyMw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmy.barackobama.com%2Fpage%2Fcommunity%2Fpost%2Fobamaforamerica%2FgGGGhZ&feature=player_embedded


Channel Icon
Closed Captions
whitehouse

 
"A New Beginning"
The President gives a speech in Cairo, Egypt, outlining his personal commitment to engagement with the Muslim world, based upon mutual interests and mutual respect, and discusses how the United States and Muslim communities around the world can bridge some of the differences that have divided them. June 4, 2009. (public domain)
Category:  News & Politics
 
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Education for Liberation!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka: Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Yahoo Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com


http://anhglobal.ning.com/group/humanerightsagenda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


Thursday, June 04, 2009

Read: 6/5/09 Nat. Community Support need @ Capitol ~ Forward: American Indian Leaders

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Gracias Hermana Ruth ~ I appreciate your sharing this information.
We need to all learn how to more wisely use the Power of the Internet
in order to reach a larger mass of people. Thus, I am passing this forward
to certain Yahoo Groups that should check it out.

You can join or create your own Yahoo Group or create and learn how to
utilize your own blogspot. You can see the Yahoo Groups above, send it
and Email then, no being a Group member, you will receive an automatic
response from Yahoo with an option to actually join the Group. We will
have to sit down together soon and I can easily show you how it is done.

Remember: concentration on the coordination of communications!

I: Internet Communication: Peta-de-Aztlan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIHg9ipU5UA

 

II: Internet Communication: by Peta-de-Aztlan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gakjyHkwbk4

 

III: Internet Communication: by Peta-de-Aztlan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYggKp3C9Ms


Education for Liberation!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka: Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Yahoo Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://anhglobal.ning.com/group/humanerightsagenda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ



From: Ruth Marquez-Washeleski <ruthwash_72@hotmail.com>
To: Alan and Geri Hill <alan-hill@sbcglobal.net>; AngieTalkingCircle <angileer@itccinc.org>; Bob Hickman <gallerywest@earthlink.net>; Carole Minear <cminear@washoetanf.org>; Clarebear <ybmagpye@yahoo.com>; Dean Hoaglin <deanh@snahc.org>; cstronberg@washoetanf.org; ECHOA BLUE <echoa.blue@yahoo.com>; Helen Kawelo <hkawelo@yahoo.com>; Mary Puthoff <mputhoff@livermore.k12.ca.us>; Patricia Roche <patriciar@snahc.org>; PeterLOPEZ HomeEmail <peter.lopez51@yahoo.com>; Rich <richr6@hotmail.com>; Rita <rita_chaske@live.com>; SusanLCSW.snahc <susanm@snahc.org>; Trinidad Aguilar-Goodshield <whitecrowbear@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 8:27:08 PM
Subject: 6/5/09 Nat. Community Support need @ Capitol FW: American Indian Leaders


FYI ,
 
Blessings,

        
               R U T H  A. MARQUEZ-WASHELESKI             
 
Angel Island Docent, State Parks Advocate
Former State Indian Museum Volunteer
Sacramento Native American Health Clinic Volunteer
Administrative Assistant, Publicity/Promotions,
Hospitality, Kitchen Staff, Special Events Coordinator
Photography & Records Management, Publicity Specialist
 



 

Subject: FW: American Indian Leaders
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:26:37 -0700
From: tony.cervantes@cdcr.ca.gov

 


From: LeBeau, Mark (CRIHB) [mailto:Mark.LeBeau@CRIHB.NET]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 2:07 PM
To:
Subject: American Indian Org. Leaders in CA Unite to Fight Cuts to State Health/Human Services!!
Importance: High

June 4, 2009

American Indian Organizational Leaders in CA Unite to Fight Cuts to State Health and Human Services!!

Your Leadership is Needed Too!!

Today leaders of American Indian organizations that provide health and human services to over 80 Tribal Governments and all Urban Indian communities in California issued a joint press release urging Governor Schwarzenegger and state legislators to fund the CA safety net programs.  Included on the list of programs to maintain is the Indian Health Program, CalWORKs 36 Indian Clinics Mental Health/Substance Abuse Program, Native American Treatment/Recovery Technical Assistance Program, Native Women's Public Awareness Campaign and other vital services.  The Indian organizational leaders urge state leadership to fund these services by raising taxes on the adult entertainment and alcohol industries.  See release below.

Also today copies of the release were delivered to the Conference Budget Committee and Governor's Office in preparation for tomorrow's (6/5/09) hearing on health and human services.  The hearing will be held in the State Capitol in Room 4203 at 9:30 AM.  It would be very powerful to pack the room with supporters of health and human services and to make a visual impact on the lawmakers by wearing red.  I'll be there at 8:45 AM and bring 40 red shirts in all sizes to give to people to wear before entering the room.  These shirts are from the 2004 Rally to Save State Indian Health Programs, they have never been worn and are yours to keep.  As you may recall, in 2004 Governor Schwarzenegger proposed similar cuts and thanks to concerned citizens and lawmakers—these cuts were avoided.  See you tomorrow.

Mark LeBeau

<<Press Release.pdf>>

California Rural Indian Health Board, Inc. * California Consortium for Urban Indian Health, Inc.

Inter-Tribal Council of CA, Inc. * California Association of Tribal Governments

For Immediate Release:  June 4, 2009                   

Contact:  Mark LeBeau, MS, Health Policy Analyst, mark.lebeau@crihb.net, phone 916-929-9761

    Jyl Hardenbergh, Director, jyl@ccuih.org, phone 415-572-7935

Gov. Schwarzenegger and state legislators entertain balancing the CA budget on the backs of the weakest, youngest, oldest, poorest and sickest

Plan calls for continuation of slashing and burning CA safety net programs

State elected leaders should fund these vital services by raising taxes on the

adult entertainment and alcohol industries

Sacramento, CA—In the California May 2009 revised budget under consideration, the Governor and Senate and Assembly leaders are considering severely slashing most of the funding of the state's health and human services safety net programs and terminating the remaining critically-important services.  Among other cuts, the plan calls for:

·       Eliminating Healthy Families which provides medical coverage to 928,000 children and teens;

·       Terminating the Indian Health Program which provides 1.2 million medical, dental, and public health nursing visits annually;

·       Ending the CalWORKs 36 Indian Health Clinics Mental Health and Substance Abuse Program which conducts mental health, alcohol/drug treatment and preparation-to-work/welfare-to-work services 120,960 times annually;

·       Suspending the Native American Treatment/Recovery Technical Assistance and Native Women's Public Awareness Campaign programs which increases capacity, reduces barriers to access to prevention/treatment/recovery and provides continuing education for substance abuse/mental health counselors;

·       Dismantling the state's CalWORKs program which serves more than 500,000 underprivileged families with children; and

·       Chopping Proposition 36 (also known as Substance Abuse Crime Prevention Act) services which allows first and second-time simple drug possession offenders to receive substance abuse treatment instead of incarceration and the failed lock 'em up approach.

All of these health and human safety net services are vital to maintain and could easily be supported through funds derived from increasing taxes on the adult entertainment and alcohol industries.

Without this social safety net, there will be crowded hospital emergency rooms, increased crime, higher rates of disease transmittal and accelerated economic decline.  Children will need medical care and families will need housing, food and work access assistance—especially with the CA unemployment rate at 11 percent and growing.  The numbers of homeless, hungry families and the uninsured costs of sick children will grow.  There will be increased morbidity and mortality of Californians.

Californians must not allow other Californians to die or become sicker due to lack of access to the safety net!  Contact state elected officials and demand that they not terminate nor slash these programs--tell them to increase revenues and boost efficiency!

·       Assembly Member Noreen Evans, Conference Budget Committee Chair, can be contacted by phone at 916-319-2007 and fax at 916-319-2199.

·       Governor Schwarzenegger can be contacted by phone at 916-445-2841 and fax at 916-558-3160.

####





Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Response from Rosalio Munoz About UFW Alums On Opposite Sides in Battle For Labor's Future by Randy Shaw

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
6-03-2009 @11:36 PM ~
Gracias Companero Rosalio for putting matters in a more enlightened context!
I remember meeting Larry Itliong and hearing about Fred Ross. I was a youngster
in the Brown Berets about 18 years old when I first went down to Delano as part
of a Food Caravan down there.

So many good people are woefully ignorant about labor history in general.
I thought Cesar was too reluctant to offer up alternative more aggressive
methods of struggle back then, but the UFW remains and the Brown Berets
faded away. I have grown and kind of mellowed over the years. I can see
now the way Cesar was handling things was the best way to go, though I
heard he was not the meek humble man many saw when it came down to
conducting Union business and handling his staff.

I only wish he would of written more than he did... writings have a way of
out living their writers.

In waging war, be it spiritually based or not, not tangible tactic can be
discounted and the art of war requires looking at all possible tactics
and trajectories. Nowadays I see the validity of 'means' being appropriate
to 'ends' and do not believe that the ends justify the means or in any means
necessary, especially when mass mobilization has not been done on an on-
going basis, especially when there is not collective consciousness among the
masses and especially when La Raza as a unique people do not even have a
common terms for themselves that almost all can agree with in discussing
political-social matters, though, La Raza is understandable by many Chicanos
and Latinos it can have a negative connotation and Latinos is male gender.
I am comfortable with 'gente de el sol'.

Our strength, besides our numbers, is our diversity as a complex people of
many ways, different cultures and generally honest hard working people.
We do not riot, we can make bloody revolution, but we want to bring about
the necessary transformation as peacefully as we can in order to avoid any
future resentments by the descendants of anyone.

All the wars men have fought and there is still no social peace. Surely a new
approach is needed by vanguard leadership.

Education for Liberation!

Peter S. Lopez ~aka: Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Yahoo Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com


http://anhglobal.ning.com/group/humanerightsagenda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ



From: Rosalio Munoz <rosalio_munoz@sbcglobal.net>
To: PETER S LOPEZ <peter.lopez51@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 5:22:27 PM
Subject: Re: FYI: UFW Alums On Opposite Sides in Battle For Labor's Future

Peter here is a response of mine I sent to Portside which ran Shaw's article

Regarding UFW Alums On Opposite Sides in Battle For Labor's Future
by Randy Shaw  -Talking Union -- Posted on June 1, 2009

With friends like Randy Shaw its harder for Mexican American and other workers to take on their main enemy, corporate America.  In his article on the HERE-SEIU conflict Shaw overstates the severity of the conflict, which is serious, but ignores the tremendous unity of labor in the election of Obama, in the fights for a stimulus plan, the seating of Hilda Solis as Secretary of Labor, the growing strength (the New York Times and Wall Street Journal to the contrary not withstanding), in the fight for the Employee Free Choice Act and an immigrant worker friendly comprehensive immigration struggle.  Yes there are important issues to resolve, more democracy as well as disciplined unity in labor, the workers especially with success on the greater issues, will work out the problems, especially with such wonderful leaders as Dolores Huerta and Eliseo Medina.

I read Shaw's recent book on the UFW, Beyond The Fields,  and found it rich with information but poor on understanding.  Shaw says that key decisions by Cesar Chavez were decisive in the weakening of the UFW and not the changes in the correlation of forces in the class struggle world wide which set back workers globally for three decades. While agribusiness and farmlabor struggles are important, the main battle field is more metropolitan in factories, health facilities, harbors etc, etc, the return to more agressive tactics and mobilizing of the community established by left trade unionist before the McCarthy era was an important contribution of the UFW movement and union organizing, we are just now catching up where labor left off.

I have raised my concerns about Shaws take on these issues with him a few times and now feel compelled to share one of my main criticism of his work I told to him.  If he had written a book "about the Virgen de Guadalupe Juan Diego would turn out to be named Fred Ross."  For those not familiar with UFW and farmworker history Ross was an Industrial Areas Foundation profesional organizer who helped initiate the Community Service Organization the Mexican American civil rights group where Cesar learned about organization and who helped Cesar organize and run the UFW. Ross played an essential role in the history.  But so did others like Ernesto Galarza, Larry Itliong, J.J. Rodriguez and countless communists and other progressives.  Oh

Shaws predominately references white activists in the UFW who helped establish and propagate innovative tactics.  Just check out his books index for Spanish and English surnames.  Historical progress develops dialectically, or as Cesar might say the "Lord works in mysterious ways."  Monday morning quarterbacking it seems to me we are likely better off so many of the organizers went on to the labor and democratic struggles all over the country for virtually all progressive causes since Reagan was President than focussing solely on the farmworker struggle.  

The internecine fights between HERE and SEIU need to be resolved for the best, but we should not let them take our eyes off the prize which Shaw's critique tends to do. La Union Hace La Fuerza!, Si Se Puede!

--- On Wed, 6/3/09, PETER S LOPEZ <peter.lopez51@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: PETER S LOPEZ <peter.lopez51@yahoo.com>
Subject: FYI: UFW Alums On Opposite Sides in Battle For Labor's Future
To: "Net-Aztlan-News Group" <NetworkAztlan_News@yahoogroups.com>, "H-R-A Group" <Humane-Rights-Agenda@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 12:54 PM

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
The struggle between for and against is one of the mind's most worse disease
as it tends to get stuck in the either-or polarity. The same as the Left-Wing
vs. Right-Wing political schizophrenia.

Obviously, whatever hinders the free expression of farmworkers and all working
-class people should be opposed, but we should be careful not to throw the baby
out with the bathwater.

Let the workers involved decide in FREE OPEN AND MONITORED ELECTIONS and
they should be included in all matters that pertain to their real welfare. We need
to get away from any form of hero worship. If I recall correctly, Herman Delores
at first was not in support of Obama when he ran for President.

Education for Liberation!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka: Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Yahoo Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo..com


http://anhglobal.ning.com/group/humanerightsagenda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "moderator@PORTSIDE.ORG" <moderator@PORTSIDE.ORG>
To: PORTSIDE@LISTS.PORTSIDE.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 9:40:50 PM
Subject: UFW Alums On Opposite Sides in Battle For Labor's Future

UFW Alums On Opposite Sides in Battle For Labor's Future
by Randy Shaw
Talking Union -- Posted on June 1, 2009

From Websource: PSL ~

http://talkingunion.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/ufw-alums-on-opposite-sides-in-battle-for-labors-future/

by Randy Shaw

Randy ShawAfter electing the most pro-union President in decades, organized labor is being torn by internal fights.. And on different sides of these conflicts are veterans of the United Farmworkers of America (UFW), whose strategic innovations have shaped today's labor movement and whose "Si Se Puede" ("Yes We Can") rallying cry became the hallmark of Barack Obama's campaign.


One dispute, now occurring in California's Central Valley city of Fresno, pits Eliseo Medina, a former UFW Executive Board member and now Executive Vice-President of SEIU, against his former UFW Executive Board colleague, Dolores Huerta. The backdrop: an election to represent Fresno's 10,000 home health care workers, who are currently represented by SEIU. Huerta held a Fresno press conference on May 27 urging workers to oust SEIU and to instead join the newly created National Union of Health Workers (NUHW). Voting begins June 1, and continues for two weeks.


The other ongoing conflict finds SEIU and UNITE HERE–the two unions most shaped by the UFW's legacy–battling over SEIU's raids on UNITE HERE's jurisdiction and membership. This fight has put longtime UFW allies on opposite sides, and is causing strains throughout the entire labor movement. The struggle led UFW veteran Fred Ross, Jr., one of the nation's leading organizers who Medina recruited to join SEIU, to announce that he was leaving the union after ten years so that he could help UNITE HERE resist SEIU's attacks.


How did this conflict emerge? As recently as April 2006, UFW alums Stephen Lerner and Eliseo Medina asked Huerta and the prominent UFW veteran Reverend Wayne "Chris" Hartmire to come to the University of Miami to help SEIU win a "Justice for Janitors" organizing campaign. While Huerta pressed the janitors cause with University of Miami President Donna Shalala, Hartmire provided strategic advice to religious supporters. Similarly, SEIU worked closely with UNITE HERE on the massive immigration marches of spring 2006, and on the national campaign to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

But since 2006, two developments have raised questions whether SEIU President Andy Stern is leading his union down the same path that led Medina and other key leaders to leave the UFW, and that caused the farmworker movement's decline.


First, SEIU moved to consolidate its local chapters throughout the nation. While reducing administrative overhead and freeing up organizing dollars, the plan also gave Stern the right to select the leadership of the newly consolidated locals. This prevented workers from electing their own leadership for three years.


As a result, Stern appointees, not representatives elected by the membership, soon dominated SEIU's governing Executive Board. When the Board then made controversial decisions–such as breaking up its third largest local, whose former leadership then started NUHW–opponents argued that this was Stern's decision, not that of a truly democratic process.


Nearly thirty years ago, it was Cesar Chavez's decision to deny farmworker representation on the UFW's Executive Board at its 1981 convention that represented the final blow to his union's growth. In the years leading up to that event, Chavez's critics were often fired or forced out, raising the same questions about union democracy that have now emerged under Stern..


The second development that dividing UFW alumni was Stern's decision to encourage Bruce Raynor and the former UNITE to secede from UNITE HERE and join SEIU. On March 23, Raynor's faction affiliated with SEIU as "Workers United," and SEIU has been raiding UNITE HERE's hotel, gaming and food service workers on the grounds that they are now part of its jurisdiction. Stern engineered this major policy shift with little or no public debate within SEIU. Workers were shifted from UNITE HERE to SEIU through little-noticed, small turnout elections–such as less than 100 voting in a bargaining unit of over 2000–that make a mockery of union democracy.


The UFW precedent is clearly on many minds. Medina responded to Huerta's urging Fresno's home care workers to vote for NUHW by noting that in the UFW she "led the campaign to fire and expel" rank and file workers "because they were independent of the UFW leadership and accountable directly to the members." Huerta responded that Medina had left the UFW in 1977 "when Cesar most needed him." While the two have privately debated the UFW's legacy, the SEIU-NUHW battle has brought this dispute between two giants of the UFW and labor movement out in the open.


NUHW's appeal to Fresno home-care workers directly challenges SEIU's commitment to union democracy, and could prove the defining issue as balloting begins this week. But the election's end will not soon heal the wounds between the many UFW veterans on both sides of this conflict, weakening if not breaking the bonds between those working side by side for social justice for over three decades.


Randy Shaw is the author of Beyond the Fields: Cesar Chavez, the UFW and the Struggle for Justice in the 21st Century (University of California Press).


_____________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest
to people on the left that will help them to
interpret the world and to change it.

Submit via email: moderator@portside.org
Submit via the Web: portside.org/submit
Frequently asked questions: portside.org/faq
Subscribe: portside.org/subscribe
Unsubscribe: portside.org/unsubscribe
Account assistance: portside.org/contact
Search the archives: portside.org/archive


Read: The Howls of a Fading Species


From: "moderator@PORTSIDE.ORG" <moderator@PORTSIDE.ORG>
To: PORTSIDE@LISTS.PORTSIDE.ORG
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 9:40:18 PM
Subject: The Howls of a Fading Species

The Howls of a Fading Species

By Bob Herbert

New York Times - June 1, 2009

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/opinion/02herbert.html

One can only hope that the hysterical howling of right-
wingers against the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to
the Supreme Court is something approaching a death
rattle for this profoundly destructive force in
American life.

It's hard to fathom the heights of hypocrisy currently
being scaled by the foaming-in-the-mouth crazies who
are leading the charge against the nomination. Newt
Gingrich, who never needed a factual basis for his
ravings, rants on Twitter that Judge Sotomayor is a
"Latina woman racist," apparently unaware of his
incoherence in the "Latina-woman" redundancy in this
defamatory characterization.

Karl Rove sneered that Ms. Sotomayor was "not
necessarily" smart, thus managing to get the toxic
issue of intelligence into play in the case of a woman
who graduated summa cum laude from Princeton, went on
to get a law degree from Yale and has more experience
as a judge than any of the current justices had at the
time of their nominations to the court.

It turns the stomach. There is no level of achievement
sufficient to escape the stultifying bonds of bigotry.
It is impossible to be smart enough or accomplished
enough.

The amount of disrespect that has spattered the
nomination of Judge Sotomayor is disgusting. She is
spoken of, in some circles, as if she were the lowest
of the low. Rush Limbaugh - now there's a genius! - has
compared her nomination to a hypothetical nomination of
David Duke, a former head of the Ku Klux Klan. "How can
a president nominate such a candidate?" Limbaugh asked.

Ms. Sotomayor is a member of the National Council of La
Raza, the Hispanic civil rights organization. In the
crazy perspective of some right-wingers, the mere
existence of La Raza should make decent people run for
cover. La Raza is "a Latino K.K.K. without the hoods
and the nooses," said Tom Tancredo, a Republican former
congressman from Colorado.

Here's the thing. Suddenly these hideously pompous and
self-righteous white males of the right are all
concerned about racism. They're so concerned that
they're fully capable of finding it in places where it
doesn't for a moment exist. Not just finding it, but
being outraged by it to the point of apoplexy. Oh, they
tell us, this racism is a bad thing!

Are we supposed to not notice that these are the
tribunes of a party that rose to power on the filthy
waves of racial demagoguery. I don't remember hearing
their voices or the voices of their intellectual heroes
when the Republican Party, as part of its Southern
strategy, aggressively courted the bigots who fled the
Democratic Party because the Democrats had become
insufficiently hostile to blacks.

Where were the howls of outrage at this strategy that
was articulated by Lee Atwater as follows: "By 1968,
you can't say `nigger' - that hurts you. Backfires. So
you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights, and
all that stuff."

Never a peep did you hear.

Where were the right-wing protests when Ronald Reagan
went out of his way to kick off his general election
campaign in 1980 with a salute to states' rights in, of
all places, Philadelphia, Miss., not far from the site
where three young civil rights workers had been
snatched and murdered by real-life, rabid, blood-
thirsty racists?

We've heard ad nauseam Ms. Sotomayor's comments -
awkwardly stated but hardly racist - about what she
brings to the bench as a Latina. But how often have we
ever heard the awful, hateful position on race offered
up by William F. Buckley, the right's ultimate
intellectual champion? He felt comfortable declaring,
in the wake of the Brown v. Board of Education decision
ordering the desegregation of public schools, that
whites had every right to discriminate against blacks
because whites belonged to "the advanced race."

Right-wing howls of protest? I think not.

Ms. Sotomayor's nomination is a big deal because never
before in the history of the United States has any
president nominated a Latina to the highest court. Only
two blacks have ever been on the court, and the one
selected by a Republican has been like a thumb in the
eye to most African-Americans.

The court is a living monument to America's long
history of exclusion based on race, ethnic background
and gender. Where is the right-wing protest against
that?

It was always silly to pretend that the election of
Barack Obama was evidence that the U.S. was moving into
some sort of post-racial, post-ethnic, post-gender
nirvana. But it did offer a basis for optimism. There
is every reason to hope that we've improved as a
society to the point where the racial and ethnic
craziness of the Gingriches and Limbaughs will finally
have a tough time finding any sort of foothold.

Those types can still cause a lot of trouble, but the
ridiculousness of their posture is pretty widely
recognized. Thus the desperate howling.

_____________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest
to people on the left that will help them to
interpret the world and to change it.

Submit via email: moderator@portside.org
Submit via the Web: portside.org/submit
Frequently asked questions: portside.org/faq
Subscribe: portside.org/subscribe
Search the archives: portside.org/archive
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Education for Liberation!
Peter S. Lopez ~aka: Peta
Sacramento, California, Aztlan
Yahoo Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com

http://anhglobal.ning.com/group/humanerightsagenda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ