Sunday, November 22, 2009

FYI: New United Movement Stops Mexico for a Day

http://upsidedownworld.org/main/content/view/2214/1/

Written by Tamara Pearson
Tuesday, 17 November 2009

In the many metro stations of giant Mexico city, amidst the ugly smell of Pizza Hut and the newspapers vendors yelling out, “Gráfico! 3 pesos!”, youth crowd around the hand written posters recruiting for the national police daily. At 12,000 pesos (US$1000) per month, and with increasing unemployment and harder prospects for the country’s youth, the offer is very tempting.

Since the US-Mexico trade agreement, NAFTA, the number of Mexicans illegally crossing the border into the US seeking employment has risen to 500,000 a year. Add to this the financial crisis (Mexicans repeat to me “When the U.S sneezes Mexico gets pneumonia”) and Mexican president Calderon’s measures to handle the crisis, which consist in a “fiscal package” of an increased consumption tax including food and medicine, new communication taxes and decreased government spending. Then add the fact that the minium wage in Mexico today buys a third of what it bought twenty years ago, and you can see how the government’s firing of 44,000 electricity workers, members of the county’s most combative and independent union, SME (Mexican Electrical Union), became catalyst for a movement of people deeply angry at both an unfair economic system, and towards a president who, most studies admit, used fraud to win the elections in 2006.

The electricity workers were fired on October 10th. On October 16th, around 500,000 people marched in the capital in protest. One month after the firing the people’s anger still had not cooled, and on November 11th there were again massive marches, road blocks, full strikes and partial strikes all across the country.

The Assembly

the-assembly

The decision to strike was taken on November 5th, in a massive meeting of the newly formed National Assembly of Popular Resistance. This is a convergence made up of around 400 unions, student, rural workers, and indigenous movements, women and gay rights organisations and left and revolutionary political parties from across the country.

The meeting was meant to start at 5, but at quarter to, the hall was already full and the streets outside where loud speakers were setup were also starting to fill up and block traffic. The chair was already welcoming each group, “Comrades from the teachers union, welcome. Compañeros of the Socialist Front, welcome,” and so on. It took about 25 minutes to welcome everyone.

There was an atmosphere of excitement, support and solidarity. In fact “support” (“This support really is seen!”) was the chant of the day as speaker after speaker from various unions declared that their union would also march and strike on November 11th, and, for four hours running, each organization declared that they would contribute to the campaign, hold their own assemblies, print leaflets, rally and march in the lead up to the strike. After and during each speaker, the audience stood tirelessly, waving their fists in the air and chanting.

On the few occasions when unions declared their support in the march, but said they would but not strike, everyone stood up and demanded, “Strike! Strike! Strike!”

The speaker from the telephone union detailed the union’s donations of food to the fired workers, while the left parliamentary party, Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) spokeswoman, a legislator, said the PRD had agreed to support all the SME’s decisions and to promote any marches, and handed over a cheque for 154,000 pesos (US $11,700).

University students promised to organize a range of political-cultural events and an “information week” to counter all the misinformation in the mainstream media, while a rural worker said the SME demands were their demands, but that they would also add the demand for food sovereignty. Even the association of retired people had a detailed and ambitious schedule of action to prepare for the national strike.

Martin Esparza, general secretary of the SME, was the last speaker. He told the meeting, “With this movement we’re going to define what kind of country we want… we have to advance and organise the people of Mexico…We create the wealth, and they socialise the losses… we pay to import what the Gringos (U.S) don’t want.”

Image“They’re after our collective contracts and our unions,” he concluded, talking of inequality, the need for dignity and for organization.

With more chants of “It’s a struggle of all workers of this country”, “Here the workers’ movement is forming”, “Give me an S, M, E…what does it spell…SME! SME! SME!” and “Unions united will never be defeated!”, the meeting concluded with a vote to strike on November 11th and to allow the SME to form a temporary organizing committee of movement representatives to coordinate the strike plans and campaign.

The Campaign

campaign

It was an intense week of campaigning. The next morning, the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) students had already put large stickers for the strike all over the insides of the trains, and there were hand painted banners in most faculties of the university, calling for assemblies and covering the walls with virtual articles on what had really happened to the SME workers.

Many workplaces held their own assemblies and even high school and primary school students marched 10 kilometres on 8 November, placards such as ‘Don’t steal my future”. SME workers marched in the thousands in the centre of the capital on 9 and 10 November.

The March

march

The long anticipated November 11th march was due to leave at 4 PM, but when I arrived at 2.30, and already there were thousands of people. Many were taking a snooze on their banners, while others were sitting on curbs reading the news. One group was spray painting a huge SME logo on the road, joking about needing Whiteout to fix their mistakes, and chanting when they finished it.

ImageThe street vendors, which really make up an ever growing army of their own in Mexico as the unemployed look for alternative ways to stay alive, sold corn, chips, and nuts from carts with posters for the strike taped all over them. When the march left they pushed their carts along with it. One woman with an SME bandana and placard alternated between joining the chanting of the march and calling out, “Two gum packets for 5 pesos!”

One street vendor, Octavio Manzera, wasn’t working that day. “I’m supporting the movement; I think it’s a just struggle. The government is acting in an unconstitutional way, violating the laws and constitution of Mexico, for commercial reasons and in order to privatise," Manzera said.

Bernando Mejia, a young worker, said “I’m here to support the Mexican people, I’m one of those who doesn’t support the government we have here.”

“I’m here to support the union,” said Ana Laura Flores, a self-described “wife of a worker.”

“I’m supporting the SME. I’m here for the solidarity more than anything,” said university student Omar Vazquez.

“I’m an SME worker, I’m an electrical engineer and I was unjustly fired. This government is a sham, it’s a government of thieves, they took our jobs unconstitutionally, violating our rights as workers and as humans,” said Omar Ruiz. Ruiz was eager to say much more, but the march had already started to leave.

Marchers chanted “If there’s no solution there’ll be revolution!” and “From north to south, east to west, we’ll take on this struggle, no matter what it costs!”, while others sang, and some stuck flags in the arms of the various metal statues that line the wide main avenue.

An hour later, we arrived at Mexico City’s huge Zócalo plaza, filling it, squashed together to the point where an interesting system of lines of humans with hands on shoulders formed in order for people to move through the crowd. Members of this march kept arriving for another two hours, while marches from six other locations also continued to arrive.

One of Many

mm5

Organizers estimated that 200,000 people participated in the march, while the newspaper La Jornada reported that police estimated 60,000. However, the march in Mexico City was just one of many, with large marches taking place across the country and in outer suburbs, and workers and movement members blocking roads from 6 in the morning.

University students closed off the roads leading to TV Azteca, one of the most right wing TV stations in the country, and there was also a protest by “the Other Campaign” in front of the US embassy. Universities went on strike, and students and teachers joined the march after their own protest on campus. The telephone and judicial power unions also went on strike, and some shops had signs saying they were turning off their lights or electricity in solidarity, while many shops were simply closed. Miners sent a contingent to the main march and held other marches in seven of the main mining cities and towns, and the National Organisation of Administrative, Manual and Technical Workers of National Anthropology and History Institute organized partial blockades of museums and archaeological zones of the country.

La Jornada reports that 14 toll booth points were also taken over. At one road block, on a main road to Puebla, one of the closest cities to the capital, national police dispersed the blockade with tear gas. La Jornada reported four injured protestors and three police. Eleven protestors were arrested and, on Thursday, Esparza told the press that they had been detained incommunicado and some had been beaten.

The Zócalo

zocalo-

Standing, listening to the speakers in the Zócalo, with my feet at unnatural angles in the little ground space available, a man in a mask shared his mandarin with me, and everyone around me listened with good humour and concentration to the speakers. A group wedged their way in front of us with a large plastic SME banner tied to ladders.

“Lower the banner! We can’t see!” yelled out the crowd around and behind me. The banner holders did, and the crowd called out, “Thanks compañeros!”

ImageMeanwhile, the students to my left were having a ball chanting vehemently, laughing and smiling and jumping up and down and sharing bags of apples.

By 7:30, it was dark and freezing, and I watched the end of the march arrive. In it came a group with drums, a dancer and a violinist. Someone in the plaza set off fireworks and the palace was lit up. The smell of roasted corn rose above the milling people as they drummed and sang, some with large paper mache masks of politicians. A group of chanters defied their audibly sore voices, and a truck with music arrived, then more drums.

Covered and Uncovered

mm4

The next day, Mexican mainstream media chose to highlight an incident involving tear gas, with headlines of “Violence” and “Chaos.” The Excelsior headlined with “Patience tested,” and its biggest photo was of the tear gas. It bemoaned “children left without classes” and naively stated: “We can’t see what Chiapas is protesting about; SME has nothing to do with them.”

ImageWhat the media did not want to talk about was a new solidarity that has formed, and how the movement has gone well beyond a labour conflict, with much more youth participating than during the protests against the electoral fraud of 2006.

An SME leader (who prefers to be described as a member), Jose Hernandez, told me the mobilization was much bigger than any previous ones, but that it was less apparent as it was spread out in various places and times.

“Up until now,” Hernandez said, “we’ve heard of 16 marches in other states, and just in the state of Michoacan for example, 11,000 schools went on strike, as well all the higher education institutions.”

“It’s also necessary to consider the amount of disorganization and domination which the large part of the Mexican working class has found itself in. What happened today signifies, without any doubt, a ‘leap’ in the consciousness of the Mexican working class. We need to be patient, but it seems to me that we’re on the threshold of qualitative change.”

c/s

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Groups push for more job creation in black and Latino communities

http://tinyurl.com/yh97el7

Groups push for more job creation in black and Latino communities

Goto Websource for Audio~.http://tinyurl.com/yh97el7
Fri, 11/20/2009 - 13:14
  • Length: 5:37 minutes (5.14 MB)
  • Format: MP3 Mono 44kHz 128Kbps (CBR)

The official unemployment rate has passed 10 percent nationwide, and if you add in other jobless people, like time workers or those who have given up actively looking for work, the rate is more than 17 percent.


The numbers have sent policy experts into panic mode. But for many communities and neighborhoods, unemployment has been above 10 percent for years. The unemployment rate for African Americans nationwide is close to 16 percent. For Latinos it is 13 percent. A deeper look at numbers is even more troubling. Five urban areas nationwide have an unemployment rate around 50 percent for black males - that's Buffalo, San Diego, Detroit, Pittsburg and Milwaukee, according to a report released in September from the University of Wisconsin's Center for Economic Development.


Federal economic stimulus dollars are trying to reverse that trend – but groups are questioning whether enough attention is going to communities of color. On Thursday, members of the Congressional Black Caucus forced a postponement of the federal regulation reform because they said not enough is being done to stimulate jobs in communities they represent.

For a closer look, we go to Richmond, Virginia where the jobless rate for black males is around 40 percent.


We're joined by Claude Stevens, Chief Operating Officer with Boaz and Ruth, a community group that has had success in turning around a neighborhood there.

Share this page!

http://www.fsrn.org/audio/groups-push-more-job-creation-black-and-latino-communities/5790?t=1258871502#comment-form
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51
http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thursday, November 19, 2009

READ: Prepared Remarks by Secretary Napolitano on Immigration Reform at the Center for American Progress

http://tinyurl.com/yf759w7

Prepared Remarks by Secretary Napolitano on Immigration Reform at the Center for American Progress
share this page

Release Date: November 13, 2009

Washington, D.C.
Center for American Progress
(Remarks as Prepared)


Thank you to John Podesta for that warm introduction. John is a good friend of mine, and I admire the work he's done here at the Center for American Progress to advance the national debate on a range of important issues. John and I have worked together extensively, and I look forward to his continued partnership.


It's not news to say that these are challenging times. From our first day in office, this new Administration was called on to meet an economic and financial crisis as deep and threatening as we've seen since the  Great Depression. The President took bold and difficult steps to prevent the collapse of our financial system and reverse the ominous trends of negative growth and massive jobs loss.


Today, thanks in no small part to the Recovery Act and other steps we have taken, the economy is growing again and job losses have slowed. But that progress is fragile, and we can't let up until all the millions who are looking for work today can find it. Yet we know that surviving this storm isn't enough if we fail to do the things we must to fortify America for the long run.


That's why this Administration is taking on the critical challenges that have been ignored in Washington for too long. We are laying a new foundation for growth and prosperity that will strengthen the economy, families and small businesses throughout the country.


By tackling the issue of health insurance reform, we can bring new security and stability to families and businesses across the country.

By planting the seeds of growth for a new, clean energy economy, we can open the door to the creation of millions of good jobs and secure America's continued leadership in this new century. By making a serious, national commitment to education reform—which means college or technical training accessible to every young person willing to strive for it—we can insure their success, and America's success, in a world where the best educated workers and workforce will win.


So even as we press to end this recession and get America back to work, we are determined to deal with long lingering problems that cloud our future. And another problem that has been punted from year to year, from Congress to Congress, from Administration to Administration, is the clear need for immigration reform.


We all know the story: A steady influx of undocumented workers, crossing our borders illegally in search of work and a better life. A market among employers willing to flout the law in order to hire cheap labor. And as a result, some 12 million people, here illegally, living in the shadows—a source of pain and conflict.


It is wrong. It's an affront to every law-abiding citizen and every employer who plays by the rules.


Like the Administration's other priorities, when it comes to immigration, we

are addressing a status quo that is simply unacceptable. Everybody recognizes that our current system isn't working and that our immigration laws need to change. America's businesses, workers, and faith-based organizations are calling for reform. Law enforcement and government at every level are asking for reform. And at the Department of Homeland Security, we need reform to do our job of enforcing the law and keeping our country secure.


Over the past ten months, we've worked to improve immigration enforcement and border security within the current legal framework. But the more work we do, the more it becomes clear that the laws themselves need to be reformed.


Let me be clear: when I talk about "immigration reform," I'm referring to what I call the "three-legged stool" that includes a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here. That's the way that this problem has to be solved, because we need all three aspects to build a successful system.


This approach has at its heart the conviction that we must demand responsibility and accountability from everyone involved in the system: immigrants, employers and government. And that begins with fair, reliable enforcement.


We know that one-sided reform, as we saw in 1986, cannot succeed. During that reform effort, the enforcement part of the equation was promised, but it didn't materialize. That helped lead to our current situation, and it undermined Americans' confidence in their government's approach to this issue. That mistake can't happen again, and it won't happen again.


The American people expect us to act. Americans value our identity as both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. Unfortunately, too many politicians and pundits have treated these values as contradictory. They are not, and we will pursue reforms that emphasize both. The immigrant story is part of what it means to be an American – but failing to fix a broken system that undermines our shared values of lawfulness and fairness is not.

This is why key members of Congress are taking steps toward legislation that will create an immigration system that works. This is why the President continues to be fully committed to reforming our immigration laws, and why he asked me to take a lead role in this effort.

What Has Changed Since 2007

While everyone may agree that the status quo isn't working, what everyone may not be aware of is how much the immigration landscape has changed since comprehensive reform efforts fell short in 2007. I've been dealing hands-on with immigration issues since 1993, so trust me: I know a major shift when I see one, and what I have seen makes reform far more attainable this time around.


For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007. The federal government has dedicated unprecedented resources to the Mexican border in terms of manpower, technology and infrastructure—and it's made a real difference.


Last March, the Obama Administration announced a Southwest Border Initiative that has increased the resources the government is dedicating to combating drug cartels, and the smuggled cash and illegal weapons they thrive on. The Departments of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense have dedicated unprecedented resources to this initiative. This includes additional inspection and surveillance technology, as well as hundreds of personnel specializing in fields like inspection, intelligence and prosecutions. At DHS, we started screening 100 percent of southbound rail shipments for illegal weapons and cash—for the first time ever.


Compared to last year, seizures in all categories—drugs, smuggled cash, and illegal weapons—are up dramatically. For example, just looking at bulk cash, Customs and Border Protection has seized at the border more than $34 million in cash being smuggled southbound so far this year—more than four times as much as at this time last year.


Moreover, the immigration debate in 2007 happened during a period of historically high levels of illegal entry into the United States. Two years later, because of better enforcement and the current economic circumstances, those numbers have fallen sharply. The flow has reduced significantly – by more than half from the busiest years, proving we are in a much different environment than we were before.


These are major differences that should change the immigration conversation.


In 2007, many members of Congress said that they could support immigration reform in the future, but only if we first made significant progress securing the border. This reflected the real concern of many Americans that the government was not serious about enforcing the law. Fast-forward to today, and many of the benchmarks these members of Congress set in 2007 have been met. For example, the Border Patrol has increased its forces to more than 20,000 officers, and DHS has built more than 600 miles of border fencing. Both of these milestones demonstrate that we have gotten Congress' message.


We've also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites. We have replaced old policies that merely looked tough with policies that are designed to actually be effective.


We've revised and standardized our immigration-enforcement agreements with state and local law enforcement to make sure that these agencies are effective forcemultipliers in our efforts to apprehend dangerous criminal aliens. We've expanded the Secure Communities program, which identifies illegal aliens being booked into local jails. Yesterday, we marked the end of the first year for this program, which is being used by 95 jurisdictions and has identified more than 111,000 criminal aliens.


Furthermore, we've transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration. We are auditing the books of thousands of employers suspected of relying on illegal labor to achieve an unfair advantage in the marketplace. As part of this effort, Immigration and Customs Enforcement audited more employers suspected of hiring illegal labor in a single day in July than had been audited in all of 2008. We're also encouraging workplace compliance by expanding and improving the E-Verify system—an Internet-based system that allows participating employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of new hires. More than 167,000 employers at 639,000 worksites use E-Verify. In the past month, the program has grown at the rate of nearly 2,000 employers per week.


Improved interior and worksite enforcement is a critical part of comprehensive immigration reform. We've demonstrated that when it comes to that issue, this Administration is committed to action.


In addition, recent improvements at managing the legal immigration system also prove that the federal government is ready to handle major reform.


We've ended a year-long backlog for background checks on applicants for green cards and naturalization. We've expanded the opportunity for a widow to gain legal status here, despite the untimely death of her U.S. citizen spouse.


We've launched a new interactive website that allows people to receive information about the status of their immigration cases by e-mail or text

message, and we have reduced the time it takes to process those cases.


In addition to these changes, since 2007 we have made significant strides in technology. For example, new biometric technology allows us to take the fingerprints of people coming into the United States and compare their prints against databases we couldn't access before. This means we have new and enhanced abilities to quickly identify people committing immigration fraud, either by using someone else's documents or by forging documents to escape detection for a past crime or immigration violation. We also have enhanced our capacity to exclude those suspected of supporting terrorism or other serious international crimes before they enter our country.


Overall, these and other changes make comprehensive immigration reform more attainable as a matter of both politics and policy. At the border, in the interior of the country, and when it comes to legal immigration, the government has made significant strides to improve enforcement. This is a fundamental change from 2007.


Here's the other thing that has shifted in this debate: a larger segment of the American public has embraced the need to engage this debate and arrive at a sensible solution to this problem. CAP has helped to document this shift.


There are leaders of the law enforcement community speaking out, saying that immigration reform is vital to their ability to do their jobs keeping Americans safe. Faith leaders, including the National Association of Evangelicals, have announced their support for immigration reform as a moral and practical issue. We are seeing more business leaders and more labor leaders engaged in this debate in a constructive way than we have ever seen before.


These constituencies have all arrived at the same conclusion that prevails among the American people: this is a problem that needs to be fixed—and the best way to ensure that we can uphold our laws is to make sure our laws are rational and enforceable.

Why DHS Needs Immigration Reform

That reality is apparent to us at DHS. Over the past year, as this Administration has pursued more effective strategies within the current laws, the picture of how exactly those laws need to be changed has become clearer than ever before. In the past ten months, we have made tough choices, and implemented significant reforms within the current legal framework—but they are not enough to create the system that we want or that we need.


If we are truly going to fix a broken system, Congress will have to act.

When it comes to immigration, I took an oath as Secretary of Homeland Security to secure the nation by enforcing the law and managing legal flows across the border. Let me be clear: to do this job as effectively as possible, DHS needs immigration reform.


Reform legislation would provide lasting and dedicated resources at our borders, and provide some critical legal tools that we don't currently have to combat smuggling organizations. For example, we need tougher anti-smuggling laws in dealing with the aggravated crimes smugglers commit—including assaulting law enforcement officers, endangering children, threatening relatives and abandoning people in the desert— hundreds of whom succumb to death from heat and lack of water. We also need to update current laws that don't cover some of the new means by which criminals conduct their business. For instance, today's smugglers and drug traffickers often move cash through "stored value" cards, which aren't even considered monetary instruments under the current money-smuggling laws.


In addition, we need improvements to the current law when it comes to interior and worksite enforcement. Dishonest businesses often ignore the civil fines for illegal employment now on the books because they're so low. It's also very difficult to prosecute these crimes as felonies because of the over-elaborate intent requirements built into the current statutes.


Moreover, some current laws covering immigration-related fraud have to be brought more in line with common sense. Right now, a corrupt immigration attorney who facilitates hundreds of immigration violations by knowingly helping aliens fraudulently seek asylum or permanent residence is treated almost the same as an alien who buys a single fake green card.


On top of this, in order to have fully effective law enforcement, we need Congress to create the legal foundation for bringing the millions of illegal immigrants in this country out of the shadows, require them to register and pay all taxes they owe, and enforce the penalties that they will have to pay as part of earning legal status. Let me emphasize this: we will never have fully effective law enforcement or national security as long as so many millions remain in the shadows.


Making sure these people become full taxpayers and pay their fair share will both benefit our economy and make it easier to enforce the laws against unscrupulous or exploitive employers. A tough and fair pathway to earned legal status will mandate that illegal immigrants meet a number of requirements—including registering, paying a fine, passing a criminal background check, fully paying all taxes and learning English.


These are substantial requirements that will make sure this population gets right with the law. It will help fix our broken system.

The Broad Need for Reform

While it's important to emphasize the need for immigration reform from an enforcement perspective, the need for reform stretches far beyond those reasons. We have to make sure the immigration system works to support American families, businesses and workers.


As part of the Administration's outreach on this issue, my Department has held stakeholder meetings with more than 1,000 people and organizations across the country. The businesses, community leaders, labor leaders, faith groups and law enforcement we've met with all have different stories, but they all reach the same conclusion: we need reform. This reform will be part of the new foundation for growth, prosperity, and security that this Administration is working to create.


Our system must be strong enough to prevent illegal entry and to get criminal aliens off our streets and out of the country. But it must also be smart enough to reward the hard work and entrepreneurial spirit that immigrants have always brought to America—traits that have built our nation.


Requiring illegal immigrants to register to earn legal status, as I discussed earlier, will strengthen our economy as these immigrants become full-paying taxpayers. As labor leaders have made clear to me, immigration reform will be a boon to American workers. Think about it: unions will never achieve the best terms for workers when a large part of the workforce is illegal and operates in a shadow economy. By contrast, the status quo not only hurts American workers, it also stifles potential opportunities to grow our economy.


A few months ago, I held a forum where I heard from technology executives in Silicon Valley, our country's center of technological innovation. They told me that they want to increase their workforce and help get the economy moving again, but some of the major barriers they have to growing their companies are visa laws that make it difficult for high-skilled foreigners to stay here to work. Today, we have a system where America educates many of the brightest individuals from around the world, and then tells them to leave the country when many of them would rather start their own ventures or strengthen businesses right here in America. This hurts the economy for all of us, and it has to change.


Going forward, our visa policies must work for every sector of our economy, and across the income scale. In my meetings, leaders in agriculture, service industries and other fields have told me that current visa policies are hindering the growth of businesses looking to expand. To address this economic need, we need carefully crafted programs that allow American businesses to hire needed foreign workers while protecting the labor and health-and-safety rights of all workers. We need to revise our current provisions for legal migration to help assure a legal workforce in cases where businesses can't find Americans to fill their jobs. These changes will make our economy stronger and more prosperous at all levels.


Community and faith leaders have also emphasized to me that we need reform because of how difficult the current laws can be on families, especially families of mixed legal status. Our immigration system is outdated where families are concerned, and we need to modernize and streamline the laws governing this process.


No one should have to wait in a line for years in order to reunite with a spouse or a young child. And we must protect the families of our men and women in the armed forces, some of whom volunteer to serve this country before they even become naturalized citizens. These individuals risk their lives to ensure the safety of all Americans. We have a duty to ensure that their families are treated with dignity when their soldiers return from combat.

I have had the honor of administering the oath of citizenship to active-duty personnel who had been serving our country long before I swore them in. These men and women are a reminder, as the President told them on the day of their swearing-in, that America is not just "a collection of rights," but also "a set of responsibilities...it depends on each of us doing our part."

Conclusion

So we all have to do our part to have a system that works. At the end of the day, when it comes to immigration, people need to be able to trust the system. Americans need to know that their government is committed to enforcing the law and securing the border—and that it takes this responsibility seriously. Law enforcement needs to have better legal tools and the necessary resources to deal with border-related and immigration-related crime. Businesses must be able find the workers they need here in America, rather than having to move overseas. Immigrants need to be able to plan their lives—they need to know that once we reform the laws, we're going to have a system that works, and that the contours of our immigration laws will last. And they need to know that they will have as many responsibilities as they do rights.


The President is committed to this issue because the need for immigration reform is so clear. This Administration does not shy away from taking on the big challenges of the 21st century, challenges that have been ignored too long and hurt our families and businesses. When Congress is ready to act, we will be ready to support them.


As I said earlier, we are both a nation of immigrants and a nation of laws. This is ingrained in our national character and it has helped make America the great nation that it is. But we must modernize our laws for the 21st century so that this vision can endure. This is a task that is critical, that is attainable, and that we are fully committed to fulfilling.

Thank you.

###

This page was last reviewed/modified on November 13, 2009.

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! General Amnesty Now!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51
http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Aztatl Garza> Re: Toman su familia en un abrazo bien fuerte. Hold your families in a tight embrace.

Gracias Aztatl ~ Clearly we need to work on mass mobilization and it all begins in our own inner consciousness. The repressed mentality is marked by a desire for a fear of the truth, a desire for and fear of freedom, a desire for and fear of organization lest we lose our ego-centric individuality.

In connected reality, there are not United Nations, there can be no true independent nation when the Amerikan Empire rules the roost! Nationhood cannot be only a subjective state of mind with the hand holding a flimsy flag, it must manifest in objective existence with the ownership and control of the viable social institutions in our lives.

In connected reality, there are no United States. Despite the narrow election of President Obama and his regime the so-called United States are still divided based upon various labels: Democrats vs. Republicans; Left vs. Right; North vs. South; White vs. Black; Citizens vs. Immigrants.

As an endangered species of life we need to evolve into a higher consciousness that bonds us together as one humane family surviving day-by-day, seeking to meet our basic survival needs, working together, loving together and knowing the grand strategic aim of toppling and transforming the Amerikan Empire by any means mandatory.

We can never lose so long as we never give up!
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://twitter.com/Peta51
http://help-matrix.ning.com/ 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THIRD-WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




From: Aztatl Garza <aztatlxikano@gmail.com>
To: NetworkAztlan_News@yahoogroups.com; intexile@iww.org; nm_raza_unida@yahoogroups.com; todoslibre@egroups.com; vrodrig5@csulb.edu; Alb Peace & Justice <mail@abqpeaceandjustice.org>; Alb. IWW <abq@iww.org>; Allen Cooper <ac611@msn.com>; Aztatl Garza <aztatlxikano@gmail.com>; Bianca Encinias <msbianca@sneej.org>; Bob Anderson <citizen@comcast.net>; CJ Levine <claytonlevine@gmail.com>; Confed.delAguila y elCondor <Kozkakuautli@gmail.com>; Darcy H Brazen <dbrazen@unm.edu>; "davidsanchezphd@webtv.net" <davidsanchezphd@webtv.net>; Ebustill <Ebustill@aol.com>; Edna Casman <ecasman@yahoo.com>; Elena Herrada <Elenaherrada@comcast.net>; Enrique Cardiel <magonista66@yahoo.com>; Food Not Bombs <fnb_505@yahoo.com>; FRANK SIFUENTES <conzafos@msn.com>; Greg s.texas Rodriguez <leftovergreg@yahoo.com>; HanaClay Li <hanali@gmail.com>; International Contacts 2 <organizateraza@hotmail.com>; James Marquez <latino_thinker@yahoo.com>; Jane Yee <jane.cambio@yahoo.com>; Janet <hootaway@comcast.net>; Javier Rodriguez <bajolamiradejavier@yahoo.com>; Jeanne <stopthewarmachine@comcast.net>; Jesse Enriquez (Lipan) <NDeLipanje@yahoo.com>; John Salazar <Salazarl8@aol.com>; JorgeDanzante GarciaSundancer <jgarcia@istec.org>; José Cuello <josecuello@wowway.com>; Joy Soler <solerjoy@hotmail.com>; Julie England <jengland745@hotmail.com>; KarenDowntownLib. K. Schmiege <kschmiege@cabq.gov>; LaloXikano AlcarazCartoonist <laloalcaraz@yahoo.com>; Lisa Burns <solas@unm.edu>; Marc Page <lovarchy@gmail.com>; Maria Cecilia Gallegos <xicaguerillera@hotmail.com>; Mary(Poet) Oishi <poetoishi@yahoo.com>; Maurus Chino <mauruschino@yahoo.com>; Mazatzin AZTEKAYOLOKALLI <zemazatzin@hotmail.com>; MEChA Unm <mechaunm@yahoo.com>; ourania tserotas <ourania_tserotas@hotmail.com>; PatriciaSan Jose Juarez <pjuarezg@yahoo.com>; Phil Indig. Konstantin <philkon@rocketmail.com>; renee wolters <rrwolters@aol.com>; Rolando J. Garcia <rjesusgarcia@gmail.com>; Ruth Millan <rutholivarmillan@sbcglobal.net>; Santiago ObispoVenezuela <sobispo@gmail.com>; "SF, CA" <info@freedomarchives.org>; "sparrow@iww.org IWW Editor" <sparrow@iww.org>; StopTheWarMachine <swm-d@swcp.com>; Teresa Marquez <andaluz@unm.edu>; Terry Schleder <tschleder@gmail.com>; "tlacayaotzin@aol.com" <tlacayaotzin@aol.com>; tochtli Califas <tochtli@berkeley.edu>; Todd Mireles <mirelese@msu.edu>; Tony Herrera <therrera1550@yahoo.com>; Tupac Enrique Acosta <chantlaca@tonatierra.org>; "Vanessa Maracaibo, Venz Di Domenico" <van3hijos@yahoo.com>; Viola Wilkins <violawil@bigpond.net.au>; Virginia Hampton <vhampton@cnm.edu>; Zap Mex <loszapatistasnoestansolos@yahoo.es>; Yafah Rai <ascentialkeyz4@yahoo.com>; Jenny Beyss <j_beyss@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 8:14:04 AM
Subject: Re: [NetworkAztlan_News] FYI: Africa: World Food Summit throws away chance to stop one billion going hungry

 

A Thanksgiving Day message:
 
false hopes otra vez
 
The U.N., the epitome of neo-liberalism, & the g8 wolves in sheep's clothing which are never satiated, make a nice married couple, both oppose our people's organizations to improve our lives by sidetracking the work we need to do in order to change our lives, Everyone by right of birth deserves the food, medicine, work, education and land that we need.

So many people around the world falsely believe that the UN is the only hope we have and will do nothing to oppose it, train it by infusing everyday people, off the street if there are no trustworthy politicians,  because billions of people are going to go hungry ? The UN is famous for teetering on the fence. Their twin is reflected in the sold out labor unions which lose millions of dollars in contract concession's that belong to unionized workers who create the wealth of the world.

Open your eyes and hearts amerika. The greed thickens, a juicy gravy for the wealthy.

Thanksgiving day needs to be synonymous with our commitment to create organizations at the work place and community level to make change happen.

Clearly, we must do it ourselves. Obviously we cannot trust anyone else.

~~~~this here is brother aztatl broadcasting from the barrio near the reservation system that confines and abandons our indigenous brothers and sisters, often to poverty and violence~~~~ organize

If I am elected I promise not only one scrawny anorexic chicken in every pot, but a giant turkey (and all the fixings) that cannot fit into an overwhelming  cauldron of good will; not just 40 acres and a broken down mule, but a hundred acres to each person to share with everyone else, and to share with all the plants and animals of our Earth Mother, who nurtures and feeds us...
 
Toman su familia en un abrazo bien fuerte.
Hold your families in a tight embrace.
Have fun this holiday season, we deserve it. 
 
 
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:39 PM, PETER S LOPEZ <peter.lopez51@ yahoo.com> wrote:
 

http://tinyurl. com/ybrallh

ActionAid (Washington,  DC)

Africa: World Food Summit throws away chance to stop one billion going hungry

18 November 2009


press release

The UN World Food Summit threw away a great chance to stop more than one billion people going hungry.

"You would think that the 20 per cent jump in the number of hungry since 2005, would spur determined and decisive action. But the World Food Summit failed to make any major breakthroughs. And the G8 leaders didn't even bother turning up.  Warm words don't fill empty stomachs," said Adriano Campolina, ActionAid's Regional Director for Latin America.

One of the biggest issues left untackled was the challenge of food security and agriculture while the reformed UN Committee on Food Security is still without sufficient funds, risking it becoming just a talking shop.

Smallholder farmers in developing countries are still vulnerable to the harmful effects of climate change as no signals were sent to Copenhagen to provide ADDITIONAL resources to help them adapt.

"The World Food Summit announced the need to increase production by 70 per cent in order to feed growing populations of up to 9 billion by 2050 through bio-technology," said Francisco Sarmento, ActionAid's head of food rights.

"But we need to fundamentally re-think the way we grow food if we are to sustain people and the planet in future.

"Evidence shows that supporting small family farms with ecologically sound farming practices is the way forward. Agriculture is currently contributing to around 30% of climate change emissions and is degrading the environment. Something needs to change – and fast."

The summit offered more of the same – with increased use of'biotechnology' .  "World leaders have overlooked the opportunity to follow more sustainable options helping to mitigate climate change and feed the world," said Sarmento.

"Governments should have declared that any climate change agreement in Copenhagen should commit resources IN ADDITION to existing aid budgets to help smallholder farmers adapt to climate change."

Meanwhile in the last seven days, nearly 180,000 citizens from around the world have signed a joint Avaaz-ActionAid petition calling on G8 governments to deliver, in full, the $20 billion developing country agriculture and food security package pledged last July.

On World Food Day, hundreds of thousands of people rallied across 25 countries, with ActionAid demanding that governments 'free the billion hungry people' and take action at the World Food Summit.  L'Aquila was a welcome step in the right direction but there must now be a timetable for disbursement, ensuring the pledge is delivered in full, with genuinely new funds.

President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso, announcing this week that one fifth of the G8 money would come from the EC, failed to mention that any of it was new," said Francisco Sarmento, ActionAid's Head of Food Rights.

"His pledge was a repacking of existing commitments, such as funds from the one billion euro food facility approved last December, the food security thematic programme and the European Development Fund."

Copyright © 2009 ActionAid. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com) .

++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
Education for Liberation! Venceremos Unidos!
Peter S. López, Jr. aka~Peta
Email: peter.lopez51@ yahoo.com 
http://twitter. com/Peta51
http://help- matrix.ning. com/ 
++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
Come Together! Join Up! Seize the Time!
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Humane- Rights-Agenda/
++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/NetworkAzt lan_News/
++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/THIRD- WORLD-NEWS/

++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ ++++++++


__._,_.___
Monitor: Peter S. Lopez "Peta": peter.lopez51@yahoo.com
List owner: Guillermo Bejarano: aztlannet@yahoo.com

To see and modify all of your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
You can subscribe to four (4) groups:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Arte
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Action
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Native-Views
OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.NetworkAztlan.com
.

__,_._,___