Sunday, February 07, 2010

Costa Rica election: Why the left is lagging via Christian Science Monitor

Costa Rica election: Why the left is lagging

Three of the four main candidates in Sunday's presidential race tilt toward the right. Among them, front-runner Laura Chinchilla could become the nation's first woman president.

Temp Headline Image

By Chrissie Long Correspondent, Sara Miller Llana Staff writer
posted February 7, 2010 at 1:52 pm EST

San Jose, Costa Rica; and Panama City —

The left has always been less powerful in Costa Rica than in other Latin American countries, but it's never been as absent as today.


Three of the four main candidates in Sunday's presidential race tilt toward the right, espousing open markets, lower taxes, and more streamlined government. Among them is a widely-popular Libertarian candidate, who has surged in polls in recent months and at one time called for the privatization of the country's beloved public health system.


Today's lone left-leaning candidate, Ottón Solís, lost the previous presidential vote by just two percentage points in 2006. Now, he lags in third place, averaging just 14.2 percent of the vote, according to polls leading up to the race. Political analysts say 78 percent of voters will choose a candidate on the right.


"Where the left has gone in this election is a mystification," says Larry Birns, director of the Council on Hemispheric Affairs in Washington.

Why the left is lagging

Part of the reason the left is lagging in this race can be attributed to the popularity of outgoing president Oscar Arias, a Nobel laureate from the right-of-center National Liberation Party (PLN) who ushered in the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and most recently was called upon to broker the political standoff in neighboring Honduras. His party's candidate, Laura Chinchilla, could capture more than 40 percent of votes Sunday, avoiding a runoff.

"We are going to win, and in the first round," said Ms. Chincilla, who would become the country's first woman president if elected.


The muted left is also due to the surge of Libertarian Otto Guevara, a pro-business candidate who wants to scrap the local currency for the US dollar and is widely being viewed as an alternative to the traditional political classes in Costa Rica.


"There are a lot of people out there that say, 'I will vote for anyone as long as they aren't with National Liberation Party,'" says Carlos Denton, president of the San José-based polling company CID-Gallup.


Mr. Guevara, a Harvard-educated attorney, is an attractive choice for those disillusioned with the current administration, Mr. Denton says. "He came on strong, he came on well-funded, and he motivated a lot of [voters]."


One such voter is taxi driver Álvaro Palomo. He had voted for Solís in the 2006 election, but was more impressed with Guevara in this one.

"The truth is that we need change," says Mr. Palomo. "Guevara represents fresh ideas. He's come in with some great proposals. I think he can really make a difference in Costa Rica. To me, [Solís] has lost some credibility and he doesn't bring anything new."

The lure of 'outsiders'

Across Latin America, voters have exhibited a desire to bring in candidates from the "outside."

"Latin America's traditional parties are tainted by corruption, blatant clientelism, and cronyism," says Carlos Guevara-Mann, a research fellow at the Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame and an expert in Panamanian politics. "Voters are fed up and hope outsiders will clean up government and straighten out the political scenario."

Last May, Panamanians elected as president Ricardo Martinelli, a conservative supermarket tycoon who touted himself as an alternative to the candidates of traditional parties. Mr. Martinelli replaced center-left Martín Torrijos.


In Honduras, conservative landowner Porfirio "Pepe" Lobo just took over the presidency after left-leaning Manuel Zelaya was ousted from power over the summer. And conservative Sebastián Piñera won the presidency in Chile this year, taking power from Chile's left-leaning alliance for the first time in 20 years.

No ideological shift

But analysts do not say that an ideological shift is under way, particularly in countries like Costa Rica, where political divides are not stark. The far-left in countries such as Nicaragua or El Salvador never found political ground in Costa Rica, a country that has long pitched itself as the democratically stable "Switzerland of the Americas."


"There are no particular ideological constructs in Costa Rica," says Kevin Casas-Zamora, former vice president of Costa Rica under President Arias and now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. "For most voters, the decision is between more traditional options and emerging ones. It's the established politics versus those who are critical of the current administration. You can't see Costa Rican politics through the lens of left and right."

Who might win?

Chinchilla, who served as vice president under Arias before launching her presidential bid, supports free trade and is socially conservative on issues such as abortion. She had enjoyed a wide lead in polls, but in recent months both Guevara and Solís have gained ground.

Guevara has appealed to those Costa Ricans seeking political alternatives, promising to make the government more efficient and taking a hard stance against crime. His platform, while not easily pigeonholed, is considered to the right of the ruling party.


Solís, of the Citizen Action Party, is on his third attempt to win the presidency. He led the opposition to CAFTA, which was almost scrapped in 2007 with his help, but is considered a "lighter" left than leftists in other countries in Latin America.


Although Solís has narrowed his opponents' leads, he remains far behind. Still, his supporters maintain that faulty polling may be to blame, and that they stand a good chance of grabbing power.


"Four years ago, the polls said Oscar Arias was ahead by 25 percent," says Rodrigo Cabezas, a Solís supporter and a founder of the Citizen Action Party. "We knew it was wrong. Come Election Day, the difference was less than 2 percent."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta~de~Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com  
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan @Peta_de_Aztlan
http://www.facebook.com/Peta51 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable."

~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Assassinated November 22, 1963
c/s


War on Drugs or War on Mexicans? New America Media, News analysis, Jose Luis Sierra,

http://bit.ly/9ktgdR

War on Drugs or War on Mexicans?

New America Media, News analysis, Jose Luis Sierra, Posted: Feb 06, 2010 Review it on NewsTrust

In the wake of the massacre of 16 students at a birthday party in Ciudad Juarez, Mexican politicos pointed fingers at each other and stonewalled journalists while civilians all over the country reaffirmed their lack of confidence in their government at all levels.

The massacre of 16 young men gathered to celebrate a birthday party on Sunday January 31, 2010 in a working class neighborhood in Ciudad Juarez left many unanswered questions.

How can a convoy full of armed men move around unnoticed in a city patrolled by 10,000 soldiers and a few thousand more federal and state police? How can they roam around the neighborhood and shoot at a group of young people celebrating a birthday party, get back in their vehicles, and escape in a timely matter just a few minutes before the arrival of the military? And how can a journalist cover a story when the journalist himself fears getting killed –either by drug cartels or the authorities - if he comes too close to the story?

Just this week the trade organization, Reporters Without Borders, issued a communiqué prognosticating another year of "hecatomb" – cattle sacrifice to the gods - for journalists working in Mexico. It came at the heel of the murder of Jorge Ochoa Martinez, 55, an editor of the newspaper El Oportuno, in Chilpancingo, Guerrero, a southern state of Mexico. On January 29th, Ochoa Martinez became the third journalist assassinated in a month; and the 65th since the year 2000. This without counting hundreds of acts of intimidation, some of which are perpetrated by authorities against members of the news media. According to the Committee to Protect Journalist, 89% of the crimes against journalists are still unresolved. A similar percentage, perhaps even higher, can be applied to the killings of civilians in "the war on drugs."

So who wants to talk about it? Be on record? Present enough evidence for an in depth story?

In-depth coverage in Mexico on any subject is difficult, let alone the underground world of drug trafficking -deeply entrenched for decades in the higher echelons of power. When journalist arrive at a crime scene, they are usually kept at bay, most often hundreds of meters away with no more resources other than their zoom lens and the usual speculative stories from the few neighbors who would talk. As the bodies are cleared, public officials arrive to declare that they are "launching an investigation." In Juarez, this has become a daily routine.

Authorities are still busy with a full investigation of the massacre in Ciudad Juarez. But those investigations have already some "miraculous" results. Less than 48 hours after the massacre, members of the Army intercepted a vehicle "that looked suspicious." They confronted an allegedly armed individual and his companion. They called a press conference soon after and informed journalists that they killed this armed individual in a confrontation and presented his companion who promptly declared that the man killed by the soldiers was the "mastermind'' of the massacre of the 16 students early Sunday morning!

Case solved? Not quite.

The press conference lasted less the six minutes, according to news reports, and the man arrested was presented to the press with his "face against the wall." No question from the press were allowed, and yesterday any charges to the surviving suspect on his alleged involvement in the killings where dropped, even though he declared publicly two days earlier that he had been assigned to be the lookout while the massacre took place.

More often than not, the only fact that the authorities provide is the number of spent jackets left by the killers during their operations.

So far, according to published records and official statements, last year in Juarez there were 2,635 killings, many of them in plain daylight and in front of dozens of witnesses. So far, according to numbers provided by the National Statistics Center from the Attorney General's Office, known here as PGR, in the whole Chihuahua's state only 54 suspects had been charged, many of them only with petty crimes and most of them exited faster than the time it took to put them in them in prisons.

Meanwhile, the death toll of the war on drugs has been increasing to the point that a new record was established. More than 16,000 drug-related killings have occurred since December 2006, when President Felipe Calderon declared war on drug cartels.

In Mexico it is not unusual for surviving victims and their family members to decline to testify in Court against their perpetrators, let alone talk openly to the press. It is not unusual that the civilian population fear the "narcos" as much as they fear the Mexican authorities. It has been proven time and again that many of play on both sides.

Case in point: on Feb 4, 2010, three policemen from Mexico City were arrested for allegedly being security guards to the man who shot Salvador Cabañas in the head on January 25th at a trendy disco in Mexico City. Cabañas is a famous soccer player from Uruguay- and a member of the well-known team, Club America.

Understandably, the civilian reactions to the Ciudad massacre on the internet - via facebook, twitters and comments posted in several newspapers' web pages - have been those of scorns and cynicisms and total disbeliefs. As it has been proven in many previous cases, most people's opinion was that the so called suspect was nothing else but a scapegoat -a strategy used too often by public officials to give the impression of effectiveness and rapid response. Some even joked that after the press conference "the suspect was taken to a bar for a few beers" for his effort.

The announcement of the arrest also raised the level of suspicions and disdain toward elected officials from all parties who are now gearing up for a political campaign season that promises to be more dirty than the daily doses of "telenovelas,'' or soap operas. The PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party) blamed the violence on the PAN (National Action Party); the PRD (Party of the Democratic Revolution) blamed the PAN and the PRI, the PVEM (Ecologist Green Party of Mexico) blamed everybody else and the PT (Workers Party) blamed Obama and the US Latin-American policies.

What's clear is that two years after Mexican President Felipe Calderon launched with great fanfare his no truce war against the drug cartels, there is hardly one state in Mexico that has not been affected by the violence. Last year Federal and States governments reportedly spent over 110 billion pesos (over 10 billion dollars) to finance the war on drugs. That number is ten times more than what was spent on other pressing issues like public health, education and transportation.

As it is, the recent massacre in Ciudad Juarez is only part of a greater tragedy, and the war on drugs might as well be called the war on the Mexican people.

Related stories
Journalism in Mexico Is a Dangerous Business

Is Mexico's War on Drugs Unconstitutional?

When U.S. Says 'Insatiable,' Mexico Hears '12-Step Program

A City Under Siege

Page 1 of 1
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta~de~Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com  

http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan @Peta_de_Aztlan

http://www.facebook.com/Peta51 

http://help-matrix.ning.com/

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Assassinated November 22, 1963
c/s


Prospects for Immigration Reform Legislation via New America Media

http://bit.ly/c5gzWl

Prospects for Immigration Reform Legislation

New America Media, Commentary, Doris Meissner, Posted: Feb 07, 2010 Review it on NewsTrust

Given the jockeying that goes on to get mentioned in a State of the Union speech, it is not surprising that insiders pushing the immigration reform agenda celebrated success. Their issue made it into the speech, reaffirming that the president's commitment remains alive and well.

Outsiders, however, were disappointed and displeased because the call "to continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system" fell far short of the rallying cry they wanted to hear. The blogosphere kicked into high gear, mostly pronouncing immigration legislation dead for 2010.

That a single sentence at a precarious political moment could be seen so differently is a fitting metaphor for assessing the prospects for comprehensive immigration reform in 2010. This latest round has again delivered a glass-half-full, half-empty outlook.

On the half-full side, there is the new importance of bipartisanship as the platform for progress in the wake of the Republican Senate election victory in Massachusetts. Senators Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) continue work on a bill that they hope to introduce as a bipartisan measure for their colleagues to take up.

Immigration legislation would always have required bipartisanship because at least a handful of Republican votes were needed to pass a bill in the Senate, even with Democrats holding a 60-vote edge. That is because several Democrats oppose key provisions supported by the majority in their party. What has changed is that immigration now becomes a more likely candidate for action because it can win adherents from both sides. In the search for problem-solving elected officials can take home to voters for the fall elections, immigration represents a new target of opportunity.

For those who see the glass as half-empty, jobs and the economy are the central issues. Recession dominated the nation's policy agenda in 2009. President Obama has pushed economic recovery and employment for the middle class to the forefront of his agenda, as support for a health care bill has faltered.

A key question going forward is whether recovery will bring with it a return to the labor market demand of the boom years, or whether a more fundamental economic realignment will emerge that generates less immigration demand, particularly for low-skilled workers, who have been largely unauthorized.

The recession has interrupted historically high immigration levels – legal and illegal – that had been underway for almost two decades and has sidelined the public controversy generated by large-scale immigration for the moment.

However, continued high unemployment and slow job growth are likely to make some of the main goals of immigration reform – legalizing unauthorized immigrants and providing for future flows of needed workers – even more controversial.

In principle, steady-state legal immigration and reduced levels of illegal immigration present an opportune time to develop and implement meaningful reform suited to the new century and economic recovery. In practice, legislation that embraces immigration has generally been enacted only in times of growth and a sense of domestic well-being.

Thus, continued high unemployment and deep political divisions on immigration within each party, as well as between them, mean that immigration reform faces strong headwinds. The chances for action are likely, therefore, to dwindle as congressional Democrats become increasingly unnerved about the party's eroding popular support at a time of deep economic distress.

While politicians, pollsters, and strategists debate next steps on immigration, another pivotal moment in the life of the nation will take place. In April, we will take the decennial census and update the nation's population estimates. Among many other things, the census could lead to a redistribution of congressional seats among the states.

As the most dynamic aspect of U.S. population growth and change, immigration will be one of the headline stories of the census. It is all but certain to be a story of continued and increasing diversity and historically high immigration levels that will shine the light from another angle on the deficiencies of the laws and policies that govern a vital element of the nation's narrative looking ahead.

Yes, it will take serious bipartisan effort to fashion an immigration reform and system that works for all who have a seat at the table. But the longer the glass is perceived as half-empty, the longer U.S. economic growth and competitiveness, national security, and the well-being of communities and individuals - native-born and immigrant alike – will be handicapped, while at the same time they are increasingly important demographically and politically.

Doris Meissner is a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., and the former commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Related Articles:
Tea Party Dabbles in Immigration Politics

Hispanic Vote Could Punish Democrats on Immigration Reform: Rep. Luis Gutierrez

Page 1 of 1
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ae169357660bcd9b46d907e7c3f15030
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta~de~Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com  

http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan @Peta_de_Aztlan

http://www.facebook.com/Peta51 

http://help-matrix.ning.com/

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Assassinated November 22, 1963
c/s


Re: [NetworkAztlan_News] Re: [MEChA] BENEFIT CONCERT MARCH 25th in L.A.!!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This should be a great benefit. Wish I could be there but time and finances make it hard to do. At least there is time before it happens in March 25th. This is good as it gives people more time to get the word out and to integrate with other social events. We need to see the big picture in terms of the historical conditions involving U.S.-Haiti relations that resulted in having the Haiti infrastructure so vulnerable to a natural disaster.


Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!

~Peta~de~Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika

Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com   

http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan @Peta_de_Aztlan 

http://www.facebook.com/Peta51  

http://help-matrix.ning.com/

 

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable."

~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Assassinated November 22, 1963

c/s




From: dorinda moreno <fuerzamundial@gmail.com>
To: Andres Cantero <cantero1@stanford.edu>; Abelardo de la Pena Jr - LatinoLA <abelardo@latinola.com>; Aztlannet News <NetworkAztlan_News@yahoogroups.com>; Arte Aztlan <NetworkAztlan_Arte@yahoogroups.com>; Los Angeles <laamn@yahoogroups.com>; The LA Progressive <dick_and_sharon@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sun, February 7, 2010 1:07:04 AM
Subject: [NetworkAztlan_News] Re: [MEChA] BENEFIT CONCERT MARCH 25th in L.A.!!

 



On 2/7/10, Andres Cantero <cantero1@stanford. edu> wrote:
Artists 4 Humanity-- Get Up & Move!!!

The Concert will be March 25th (spring break!) at The Vanguard. It is located at 6021 Hollywood Blvd., Hollywood, Ca 90028 from 8pm to 2 am

Please this is our way to help UNICEF and have fun doing so.

If you would like to help and raise money please post this link on you facebook, myspace, twitter etc... lets collaborate and be a people for change
!

I'll be there, will you?


--
Andres Cantero Jr.
Stanford University Class of 2012
B.A. Candidate | Public Policy
Minor Candidate | Economics
Stanford Cheerleading 2008-2010
Institute of Research on Education Policy and Practice | Intern 2008-2010
F4ED | Instructor
RuffaloCODY | Caller/Fundraiser
"Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." -Les Brown

____________ _________ _________ _________ ________
MEChA de Stanford E-Mail List
http://mecha. stanford. edu
https://mailman. stanford. edu/mailman/ listinfo/ MEChA



--
Dorinda Moreno, Fuerza Mundial
Elders of 4 Colors 4 Directions
Hitec Aztec Collaborations/ FM Global
We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For!
<fuerzamundial@ gmail.net>
CA Public Benefit corporation

Tina Flores, QMR  (Quality Medical Relief)
Supplies to Haiti on air cargo.
Working with Haiti Action Network.  
Please visit website for latest updates.
qualitymedicalrelie f.com
or
oakland-santiagodec ubasistercities. org
510 482-9241

Corazon Del Pueblo Cultural Center
4814 International Blvd.
Oakland, CA 84601

Myriam Merlet, Magalie Marcelin, Annie Marie Coriolan, Zilda Arns, Presente!!
__._,_.___
Monitor: Peter S. Lopez "Peta": peter.lopez51@yahoo.com
List owner: Guillermo Bejarano: aztlannet@yahoo.com

To see and modify all of your groups, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
You can subscribe to four (4) groups:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Arte
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Action
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_Native-Views
OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.NetworkAztlan.com
.

__,_._,___