Sunday, March 21, 2010

Out of the Shadows: A Rally for Immigration Reform via Politics Daily + Comment

http://bit.ly/9EVTJj

Out of the Shadows: A Rally for Immigration Reform
Posted:03/21/10

via Luisita Lopez Torregrosa ~
Contributor

On Sunday,advocates for two of the most controversial issues of our time will intersect by chance at the same time and almost in the same place in Washington.

While the House of Representatives holds its most critical vote on history-making health care reform on Capitol Hill, tens of thousands of immigration reformers are expected to crowd into the National Mall nearby, flying multicolored flags, holding posters, and shouting slogans.

No doubt, the vote on health care will be first and foremost in the minds of most Americans and the media, as it has been for more than a year. But the rally for immigration reform, which was scheduled long before the vote on health care, is no mere sideshow. They call it the March for America, and it's been building up steam for months.

On what they labeled "Coming Out of the Shadows" week, grassroots volunteers and veteran organizers, militants and activists, legal and illegal immigrants, gathering under the umbrella of 200-plus advocacy groups, will unpack their dreams and struggles and lay them at the feet of the Congress and Obama administration. The mission is clear: immigration reform now.

The numbers are huge: the United States has 11 million illegal immigrants (or in the movement's preferred phrase, undocumented workers) and millions more who are descendants of immigrants, and even more millions who have become American citizens. In the face of such numbers -- Hispanics are the nation's largest minority at some 40 million -- legislation opening a way for illegal immigrants to reach legal status is viewed by advocates as the only acceptable and sane solution. That's understood, on the right and left, Democrats and Republicans, border hawks and bleeding hearts.

But timing for such an overhaul couldn't be worse. After the long and bruising fight for health care reform, the Democrats and President Obama have exhausted political capital and worn thin the patience of the American people. You can almost picture Americans out there in the middle of the country, which is to say most of the country, nodding off or shaking their heads in disbelief at the thought that coming around the bend is another nationwide brawling town-hall-style shouting match -- this time over immigration laws.

No one looks to win reelection votes over this. Still, something's got to be done or at least it's got to look like something's being done. Obama, the candidate, promised immigration reform, won support in 2008 from the millions of Hispanics who believed him. But nothing has happened yet and many in the immigrant community, who support health care reform as well, are getting worn down waiting for their turn.

The president is not tone deaf, so on March 11 he promised he'd push for an overhaul of the system -- that is, if (and a big if) he could attract serious GOP support. Last time immigration reform was debated in Congress during the Bush era, when even the conservative president and a conservative senator, John McCain, supported change, the legislation ended up in shreds.

But stepping to the rescue, not coincidentally just days before the March 21 rally, two major players, Sens. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Lindsey Graham, (R-S.C.), have offered an outline of a proposal that, first, requires illegal immigrants to admit they broke the law before they can gain legal status and, second, demands that all workers carry an identity card to prove they are eligible to work.

"Last week we met with President Obama to discuss our draft framework for action on immigration,'' the senators said in a column in the Washington Post on Wednesday. "We expressed our belief that America's security and economic well-being depend on enacting sensible immigration policies. The answer is simple: Americans overwhelmingly oppose illegal immigration and support legal immigration."

The blueprint includes tougher enforcement at the border and in workplaces, and it favors visas for highly educated immigrants over blue-collar and uneducated immigrants. This last nod to conservative thinking runs in direct opposition to the fact that many immigrants, whether from Latin America and the Caribbean, Africa or the Asian subcontinent, come from poor, uneducated backgrounds.

Allowing for bipartisan support, the Schumer-Graham proposal stands a chance, but it won't be a smooth path to a vote on passage in Congress, either this year or next. Still, against the odds, thousands of believers are expected in the nation's capital Washington this weekend. In a burst of spirit and hope -- those intangibles that drive underdog movements -- an organizer at DreamActivist.org declared that "undocumented youth all over this country will finally come out of the shadows and lay claim to their own futures...No longer will we let ourselves be intimidated, scared and ashamed...'' He beckoned the young and ardent to step up and claim their ground.

And so they have. In the ramp up to the Sunday rally, scores of young immigrants held "coming out parties" in several cities, carrying banners that read, "Undocumented and Unafraid."

Many among them came to the United States illegally as children, but have since grown up here, stayed in school, and kept out of trouble. They include honor roll students, athletes, artists, aspiring teachers, doctors and soldiers, according to the National Immigration Law Center. They have lived in the United States most of their lives but they bump their heads against barriers to higher education, they cannot work legally, and they live in constant fear of detection.

A piece of bipartisan legislation known as the Dream Act, first introduced in 2001 and reintroduced in the House and Senate on March 26, 2009, would deal with those intractable questions. Though the bill has gained Obama's support and bipartisan backing from members of both houses of Congress, it needs an up-from-the-gut shout-out to become law.

That's hardly in the cards. For now, the youth wave is swelling, their numbers increasing, and their voices rising. This new generation will soon become the face and shape of the movement.

Follow PoliticsDaily On Facebook and Twitter,
and download the new Politics Daily toolbar!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comment: We need to be in tune with connected reality without being naive or idealistic. Obama has become a great downer for those who expected a more progressive president not co-opted by Amerikan fascism and corporate capitalism. I doubt that there will be any kind of sane humane immigration reform this year, certainly not before November Elections. The Immigrant Rights Movement needs to look at the big picture, international law and the creation of stable sanctuaries inside the United States where we can give refuge to the refugees, even if we have to have those sanctuaries be under a Church cloth without legal approval by a fascist regime. God's natural law is superior to man's mortal laws. Should it be illegal to give refuge to a poor scared family just trying to stay alive upon Mother Earth?!?

The U.S.A. Government is not morally and ethnically in a position to dictate humane morality to anyone. It violates its own Constitution on a daily basis! Where is the liberty and justice for all inside Amerika?!? We of La Raza Cosmica ~all of us: Mexicanos, Chicanos, Latinos, Indigenous etc.~ are not and have never been invisible, we should know that though the corporate controlled mass media will do its best to ignore us in our splendid millions. White racism is still alive and well.
Many White racists have seen the impact of the early Civil Rights Movement upon the domestic scene and dread the ideal of a Chicano-led Humane Rights Movement that advocates for sane and humane immigration reform.

Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!

~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/   

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s


Saturday, March 20, 2010

Senators Urge Biometric ID Cards for All U.S. Workers in New Proposal

http://bit.ly/9LdBAz

Senators Urge Biometric ID Cards for All U.S. Workers in New Proposal


Last year, the Washington Post reported that Senate Democrats were  looking to change federal immigration laws (after failing to overhaul them in 2007). Instead of just creating an error-filled national database of Americans' employment eligibility, legislators were seeking to require "that all U.S. workers verify their identity through fingerprints or an eye scan."


Now federal legislators are again looking to create a national identification system with biometric data on all U.S. workers, not just immigrants. In a Washington Post editorial, Sens. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) announced a framework for immigration reform. (After the jump, I explain the substantial privacy problems inherent in the proposed system.):
Our plan has four pillars: requiring biometric Social Security cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those already here.
Besides border security, ending illegal immigration will also require an effective employment verification system that holds employers accountable for hiring illegal workers. A tamper-proof ID system would dramatically decrease illegal immigration, experts have said, and would reduce the government revenue lost when employers and workers here illegally fail to pay taxes.
We would require all U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who want jobs to obtain a high-tech, fraud-proof Social Security card. Each card's unique biometric identifier would be stored only on the card; no government database would house everyone's information. The cards would not contain any private information, medical information, nor tracking devices.
President Obama released a statement:
I am pleased to see that Senators Schumer and Graham have produced a promising, bipartisan framework which can and should be the basis for moving forward. It thoughtfully addresses the need to shore up our borders, and demands accountability from both workers who are here illegally and employers who game the system. [...]
I congratulate Senators Schumer and Graham for their leadership, and pledge to do everything in my power to forge a bipartisan consensus this year on this important issue so we can continue to move forward on comprehensive immigration reform.
Where to begin? First, the senators say, "Each card's unique biometric identifier would be stored only on the card; no government database would house everyone's information." But that seems unlikely. What if someone hacked a real card and added their biometric data (fingerprints, eye scans, whatever is chosen by the government) to the card? Their fingerprints would match the fingerprints on the card, so they would be "identified" as the name on the card. There would likely need to be a database to check for accurate credentials.


Altering a biometric digitally by breaking into the system is just one security problem with biometric identification. Individuals could use false identification at enrollment or a biometric could be altered physically.


The senators state that they need "a tamper-proof ID system" to fix the immigration problem. But there is no tamper-proof ID system. You can strengthen ID systems, but they'll still be forged by people with means and motive. Former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said that the fact that REAL ID and other strengthened identification cards can be forged is a security problem:
I certainly have seen intelligence that tells me that sophisticated criminals and sophisticated terrorists spend a great deal of time learning to fabricate and forge even these improved cards. The net effect of this may be that it's going to be harder for people on campus here to get a drink when they're under 21, but unfortunately it's not going to be that much harder for the most sophisticated dangerous people to counterfeit an identity card.
What the senators would be creating is a trusted card that could and would be forged by sophisticated criminals. Even if you allow the senators' contentions: the tamper-proof card would have the biometric credential only on the card so there would be no national database, we must then look at the cost of this system. There would need to be computer systems set up for the new high-tech cards, strong encryption, special paper, special readers to 7.4 million employers in the United States, training for employers and employees, and other costs, as well. This would cost billions, perhaps trillions.

And how quickly would this employment verification card be expanded to many more uses beyond employment verification? It is to be "a high-tech, fraud-proof Social Security card," and Social Security data is used for numerous uses today. Your Social Security number is used to open a bank account, credit account or even cellphone account. How soon before these entities say, "I need you to prove your identity by scanning your high-tech biometric Social Security card"?


How quickly will this database go from being strictly to prove employment eligibility to being used by police departments to gather fingerprints while circumventing the warrant process and Fourth Amendment rights of search and seizure? Who else could have access to your fingerprint and iris scans? The United States already has discussed sharing fingerprint and other biometric data of suspects with European countries. It's a small step to opening up a national employee biometrics database to other countries.

Besides the security problem, there is also a substantial problem for U.S. citizens and others who may legally work in the United States. During the REAL ID national identification card debate, critics of the REAL ID program noted there is the false positive problem. U.S. workers were having problems with an employment eligibility verification system using Social Security and Homeland Security error-filled databases. Several federal (pdf) government evaluations (pdf) noted problems with database checks that lead to initial rejections for individuals who are legally eligible to work in the US, causing significant problems for eligible workers and their employers, who have done nothing wrong.


I must reiterate: This biometric identification system, where you must prove to the government that you are eligible to work, is proposed for all U.S. employees, not just immigrants. It is a terrible proposal that will not solve the immigration problem, but instead create substantial employment problems for U.S. citizens at a time when many need help to find employment, not more barriers against it.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comment: Take it for what it is worth. Cards for all? Yes, the Devil is in the details. No borders! Amnesty Now, PERIOD!
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!

~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/

http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan

http://www.facebook.com/Peta51

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/   

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s

The right way to mend immigration By Schumer & Graham +push high-tech Social Security cards+ Statement President Praising Bipartisan Immigration Reform Framework

http://bit.ly/bN5Mf1
The right way to mend immigration

By Charles E. Schumer and Lindsey O. Graham
Friday, March 19, 2010; A23 



Our immigration system is badly broken. Although our borders have become far more secure in recent years, too many people seeking illegal entry get through. We have no way to track whether the millions who enter the United States on valid visas each year leave when they are supposed to. And employers are burdened by a complicated system for verifying workers' immigration status.

Last week we met with President Obama to discuss our draft framework for action on immigration. We expressed our belief that America's security and economic well-being depend on enacting sensible immigration policies.

The answer is simple: Americans overwhelmingly oppose illegal immigration and support legal immigration. Throughout our history, immigrants have contributed to making this country more vibrant and economically dynamic. Once it is clear that in 20 years our nation will not again confront the specter of another 11 million people coming here illegally, Americans will embrace more welcoming immigration policies.

Our plan has four pillars: requiring biometric Social Security cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those already here.

Besides border security, ending illegal immigration will also require an effective employment verification system that holds employers accountable for hiring illegal workers. A tamper-proof ID system would dramatically decrease illegal immigration, experts have said, and would reduce the government revenue lost when employers and workers here illegally fail to pay taxes.

We would require all U.S. citizens and legal immigrants who want jobs to obtain a high-tech, fraud-proof Social Security card. Each card's unique biometric identifier would be stored only on the card; no government database would house everyone's information. The cards would not contain any private information, medical information or tracking devices. The card would be a high-tech version of the Social Security card that citizens already have.

Prospective employers would be responsible for swiping the cards through a machine to confirm a person's identity and immigration status. Employers who refused to swipe the card or who otherwise knowingly hired unauthorized workers would face stiff fines and, for repeat offenses, prison sentences.

We propose a zero-tolerance policy for gang members, smugglers, terrorists and those who commit other felonies after coming here illegally. We would bolster recent efforts to secure our borders by increasing the Border Patrol's staffing and funding for infrastructure and technology. More personnel would be deployed to the border immediately to fill gaps in apprehension capabilities.

Other steps include expanding domestic enforcement to better apprehend and deport those who commit crimes and completing an entry-exit system that tracks people who enter the United States on legal visas and reports those who overstay their visas to law enforcement databases.

Ending illegal immigration, however, cannot be the sole objective of reform. Developing a rational legal immigration system is essential to ensuring America's future economic prosperity.

Ensuring economic prosperity requires attracting the world's best and brightest. Our legislation would award green cards to immigrants who receive a PhD or master's degree in science, technology, engineering or math from a U.S. university. It makes no sense to educate the world's future inventors and entrepreneurs and then force them to leave when they are able to contribute to our economy.

Our blueprint also creates a rational system for admitting lower-skilled workers. Our current system prohibits lower-skilled immigrants from coming here to earn money and then returning home. Our framework would facilitate this desired circular migration by allowing employers to hire immigrants if they can show they were unsuccessful in recruiting an American to fill an open position; allowing more lower-skilled immigrants to come here when our economy is creating jobs and fewer in a recession; and permitting workers who have succeeded in the workplace, and contributed to their communities over many years, the chance to earn a green card.

For the 11 million immigrants already in this country illegally, we would provide a tough but fair path forward. They would be required to admit they broke the law and to pay their debt to society by performing community service and paying fines and back taxes. These people would be required to pass background checks and be proficient in English before going to the back of the line of prospective immigrants to earn the opportunity to work toward lawful permanent residence.

The American people deserve more than empty rhetoric and impractical calls for mass deportation. We urge the public and our colleagues to join our bipartisan efforts in enacting these reforms.

Charles E. Schumer is a Democratic senator from New York. Lindsey O. Graham is a Republican senator from South Carolina.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/17/AR2010031703115.html

http://bit.ly/9dp2BH

Schumer, Graham push high-tech Social Security cards
Want ID system to help make sure workers are legal

'The first casualty of the Democratic health care bill will be immigration reform,' Senator Lindsey Graham said.

WASHINGTON — Democratic Senator Charles Schumer and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said the federal government should require high-technology Social Security cards to make sure employers hire only legal workers.

"A tamper-proof ID system would dramatically decrease illegal immigration, experts have said, and would reduce the government revenue lost when employers and workers here illegally fail to pay taxes,'' the lawmakers wrote in an article on the website of The Washington Post. They called for use of biometric Social Security cards that would include a unique characteristic of the cardholder, such as a fingerprint.

The proposal is part of what Graham and Schumer termed a "draft framework'' for overhauling immigration laws. The framework includes proposals for a temporary worker program and penalties that would allow illegal immigrants to stay after taking steps such as paying fines and performing community service.

"America's security and economic well-being depend on enacting sensible immigration policies,'' they wrote.

President Obama, in a statement, called the senators' proposal a "promising, bipartisan framework which can and should be the basis for moving forward.'' Obama met with Schumer and Graham last week to discuss the proposal, the senators wrote. Obama's statement said he would "do everything in my power to forge a bipartisan consensus'' on the issue.

Graham, however, cautioned yesterday that the push for an immigration measure would fail if congressional Democrats succeed in passing the overhaul of the health care system sought by Obama. House Democratic leaders are seeking to pass the latest version of the legislation tomorrow. "The first casualty of the Democratic health care bill will be immigration reform,'' he said in a statement.
"If they do this, it's going to poison the well for anything else they would like to achieve this year or thereafter,'' Graham told ABC.

A demonstration in Washington in support of overhauling immigration laws is scheduled for tomorrow. The event's sponsors include the National Council of La Raza, the AFL-CIO labor federation, and the Service Employees International Union.

Past bi-partisan efforts to revise immigration policy include legislation cosponsored by Senators John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, and the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat. Even the support of then-President George W. Bush failed to push the measure forward in Congress in 2007.

Schumer and Graham would require those already in the United States illegally, an estimated 11 million, to admit they had broken the law, pay fines and back taxes, and perform community service projects. They also would be required to pass a background check and learn English.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/20/schumer_graham_push_high_tech_social_security_cards/

http://bit.ly/dAi9nC


The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
March 18, 2010


Statement by the President Praising the Bipartisan Immigration Reform Framework


In June, I met with members of both parties, and assigned Secretary Napolitano to work with them and key constituencies around the country to craft a comprehensive approach that will finally fix our broken immigration system. I am pleased to see that Senators Schumer and Graham have produced a promising, bipartisan framework which can and should be the basis for moving forward.  It thoughtfully addresses the need to shore up our borders, and demands accountability from both workers who are here illegally and employers who game the system.


My Administration will be consulting further with the Senators on the details of their proposal, but a critical next step will be to translate their framework into a legislative proposal, and for Congress to act at the earliest possible opportunity.


I congratulate Senators Schumer and Graham for their leadership, and pledge to do everything in my power to forge a bipartisan consensus this year on this important issue so we can continue to move forward on comprehensive immigration reform.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/statement-president-praising-bipartisan-immigration-reform-framework
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comment: Let us not forfeit our native-natural rights to be here as descendants of the original peoples of these lands of Aztlan in the name of a weak reform with inherent flaws. Who determines who is a gang member, smuggle and terrorist and how will such a determination be made?!
It is going to be a mess. Beware!

Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!

~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/


http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan


http://www.facebook.com/Peta51


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/   


"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s

Friday, March 19, 2010

Hundreds of Thousands Expected to Gather in DC for Immigration Rights March + Comment

http://bit.ly/97Pshk
March 19, 2010

Hundreds of Thousands Expected to Gather in DC for Immigration Rights March

We-are-americaweb

An immigrant rights march planned on Sunday is expected to draw over 100,000 people from a broad coalition of groups across the country to call on President Obama live up to his promises and Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform. We speak with members of La Raza and Make the Road New York.

Clarissa Martinez De Castro, Director of Immigration and National Campaigns at the National Council of La Raza.

Ana Maria Archila, member of the community organization Make the Road New York.

JUAN GONZALEZ: President Obama has pledged to move forward on immigration reform and embraced a draft plan from Senators Charles Schumer and Lindsey Graham for overhauling the nation's immigration system. In a statement released by the White House Thursday, Obama praised the senators', quote, "promising bipartisan framework," adding that it, quote, "can and should be the basis for moving forward." The four-point proposal from Senators Schumer and Graham includes high-tech identification cards, bolstering border security, creating a process for admitting temporary workers, and implementing a, quote, "tough but fair path" for legalization.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, the announcement comes just before a planned march on Washington this Sunday called by immigrant rights advocates. Over 100,000 people from a broad coalition of groups across the country are expected to rally at the National Mall, demanding President Obama live up to his promises and Congress pass comprehensive immigration reform.

We're joined now in Washington, DC by a lead organizer of Sunday's march, Clarissa Martinez De Castro, the director of immigration and national campaigns at the National Council of La Raza.

Clarissa, you met with President Obama. What were your demands? What did you talk to him about this past week?

CLARISSA MARTINEZ DE CASTRO: One of the main purposes of that meeting was to make sure the administration understood very clearly the state of emergency that immigrant communities are living in every day and that that state of emergency is created by inaction on immigration reform. We have heard commitments from the administration in the past, as well as from Congress, to do something to finally address this issue, but we haven't seen a lot of real action. So the idea was that they needed to start demonstrating very clearly steps to get there. And we have seen some of these steps happen this week, leading up to the march on Sunday.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, Clarissa, this promises—it looks like it's going to be the largest protest march of the Obama administration so far, and it seems that already there has been enormous reaction by the administration and by Congress just as you were organizing the march. There were a series of meetings that the President held. Luis Gutierrez, the congressman from Chicago, who has been a leading advocate of immigration reform, said, I think just yesterday, that he promised to vote for health reform on the basis that the administration was promising that it would move forward on immigration reform this year. So you're already getting a lot of at least verbal support. The question is, will it be translated into action in Congress? And could you give us a sense of what you feel about the proposals of Senator Schumer and Lindsey Graham?

CLARISSA MARTINEZ DE CASTRO: Sure. First, let me say that, you know, certainly my organization is part of March for America, but it is important to know that there are over 700 organizations across the country who are part of this effort, and it is that combined energy that it's bringing these results.

Yesterday, as you mentioned, Senator Schumer, Democrat from New York, and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina, unveiled some broad parameters of what they're proposing will be then turned into a legislative vehicle. There's not a great deal of detail in those parameters at this point. So we look forward to those ideas being swiftly translated into a legislative vehicle that then we can analyze in detail. So far they're talking about four pillars that will drive that bipartisan proposal, and they deal largely, as they describe them, with border security, worker flows, which means legal immigration issues, with worker eligibility verification to work, and with a legalization program.

AMY GOODMAN: Clarissa, La Raza opposed the healthcare reform bill?

CLARISSA MARTINEZ DE CASTRO: We issued our statement yesterday, that we didn't think it really addressed the needs of the most vulnerable among our populations.

JUAN GONZALEZ: We're joined here in New York by Ana Maria Archila of the community organization Make the Road by Walking [Make the Road New York].

Welcome to Democracy Now!

ANA MARIA ARCHILA: Thank you so much.

JUAN GONZALEZ: The importance of this march, this upcoming march, and the need to get comprehensive immigration reform this year, if possible, could you talk about that?

ANA MARIA ARCHILA: Yes. Well, immigrant communities across the country have been waiting and waiting to see a real solution to the crisis that we have. We have a legal system that basically creates a second class of non-citizens that are easily exploitable; that are exploited at work every day; that, when they go into the detention centers, do not have any sense of due process; that are forced to live in fear and are facing the realities of being separated by their—from their families. And so, this legal system has existed in this country for too long, so long that now we have 12 million people who are undocumented and who live under these conditions every day.

So, all of us worked really hard to make sure that—to create a different political space in the country. Back before the elections, in 2006, millions of people came out to march. Millions of people who could lose their jobs, who were afraid of government, came out and took over the public space to say this needs to change. In 2008, over ten million Latinos helped elect President Obama, helped put the Democrats in control of the Senate and the House of Representatives, with the promise that immigration reform would be a priority. And nothing—there hasn't been real movement.

And at the same time, there are people like Marta Freire, one of our members who lives in Queens, a woman from Ecuador, undocumented women, who, in 9/11, was one of the cleanup workers after 9/11. She now has developed cancer, terminal cancer, and she wants to be able to see her daughters. She wants to be able to travel to her country and say goodbye to her daughters before she dies, after she did the work that she did for this country. There are many stories like Marta's story, and that's why people are marching on Sunday, to make sure that the message of restoring dignity and opportunity to millions of people that have done so many things to make this country strong, that that promise that was—that Obama made and that members of Congress made is actually kept.

JUAN GONZALEZ: One of the things I think I was struck by, in terms of the parameters that were unveiled by Senators Schumer and Lindsey Graham, was that there's going to be an emphasis, in terms of future immigration, more on high-tech workers, rather than on blue-collar workers, basically bringing in more computer and scientific workers from—expanding the H-1B portion of immigration and reducing the number of low-income workers that are coming in the country. Do you have some concerns still about some of the issues that are being raised by Senator Schumer and Senator Graham?

ANA MARIA ARCHILA: Well, so we have—so, first, I want to say I think the organizing that has happened in immigrant communities, both street organizing and political organizing, has taken us this far. We were able to get President Obama to meet with immigration advocates. We were able to start seeing some action in the Senate. So that's great.

The parameters that are established by the op-ed that Senators Schumer and Graham published yesterday do emphasize quite heavily enforcement and also emphasize quite heavily what you mentioned, which is creating flows for migration for kind of highly educated immigrants. We know that that's one of the interests of businesses in this country, is being able to retain—attract and retain people who are highly skilled. But we also know that the reality of this country is that some of the industries that are growing fastest are not the high-tech industries, are not those industries, are other industries that we also need to keep in this country. So there needs to be a way to look at the future and think about how to welcome workers in a way that is organized, that is orderly, and that also protects and respects the rights of those workers. And we look forward to working on those details.

AMY GOODMAN: Clarissa Martinez De Castro in Washington, I wanted to go back to that issue of healthcare. It's very significant. You've come out with a statement yesterday. Why do you feel the healthcare reform bill does not help the most vulnerable immigrants in this country?

CLARISSA MARTINEZ DE CASTRO: Well, we—granted, we understand that the fight over healthcare is very difficult. We also believe that one of the purposes should be to remove the structural barriers to those people who are having a hard time either obtaining healthcare or obtaining quality healthcare. In the case of the Latino community, we have one of the largest uninsured populations. And we feel that there was a real opportunity here to right a wrong that was done in the past, where we started treating legal immigrants and US citizens as if they were different classes of people. There was a real opportunity to do that. We know that many folks try to manipulate the immigration issue to block healthcare reform. This is a recurring problem and, there again, one of the reasons why we need to do immigration reform.

But there was—but instead of standing strong on principles of healthcare reform, what we saw was that instead of undoing that wrong that prevents legal immigrants who are contributing to our society from that being treated differently, that that stayed in there. So there was an opportunity to do that, to remove structural barriers that had been artificially created, and instead of that, they stayed in place, and we added some others.

This is a very difficult position for us to take. We understand how much the country needs healthcare. But we also understand that when you have an opportunity to truly address the barriers that are preventing communities across the country from really accessing care, that we need to do a better job. And we need to be mindful of how the most vulnerable among us are treated in those proposals.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And Clarissa Martinez, to go back to the immigration reform issue, could you talk about what the impact could possibly be in November if immigration reform is not passed? Obviously there are people like Harry Reid himself, the Senate Majority Leader, who's facing a tough race in Nevada. What would the message be to the Latino electorate if immigration reform is not passed?

CLARISSA MARTINEZ DE CASTRO: Well, that's an important point, particularly because, look, the immigration issue has been debated now how many years? So that's one of the reasons we feel that there can be swift action, because they have debated this issue over and over again. What has stopped it from happening is that it's become a political football. And first of all, it's unacceptable that people are seeing their lives come to bitter ends every day or sent away from their children, all because of politics. That's why it's time to act.

In terms of Latinos, I think that there's been a back-and-forth over time about whether Latinos care about immigration or not. Here's the reality. Latinos care very deeply about bread-and-butter issues, and in the current state of the economy, there's no question that we're very concerned about the economy and jobs. But we also care about respect. And that's how we see the issue of immigration. Even if you're a tenth generation American, when you're Latino, the way that this issue gets debated really has a lot to do with how you are regarded and how you are treated. And we have seen a lot of discrimination, increase in hate crimes against the Latino community, due to the vitriol in the immigration debate. That is one of the reasons why this issue has such an energizing power on the civic participation of Latinos and why it drove us to march in 2006, as it will do now, why it drove people to become citizens, and then, citizens native-born and new Americans alike, to vote in 2008.

Some say, hey, this is just—Latinos are just going to become Democrats. That is not the case. But parties have to fight for our vote. For Democrats, action is essential, because promises were made and because the issue has such dire consequences. But for Republicans, progress on this issue and solutions is also essential, if they want to start restoring their relationship with Latinos who are the fastest-growing electorate in the nation. And we're going to be watching who takes action to try to get this done, who sits on the sideline, and who works to obstruct it. And that's how it—that's going to influence our vote in November.

AMY GOODMAN: Clarissa Martinez De Castro, thank you very much for joining us, director of immigration and national campaigns at the National Council of La Raza. And Ana Maria Archila of Make the Road by Walking [Make the Road New York], thank you so much.


Creative Commons License The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.


Original Link Source:

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/19/hundreds_of_thousands_expected_to_gather

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comment: I for one cannot be there in Washington, D.C. this Sunday because I have commitments here in Sacramento and cannot really afford to go. Nonetheless, I support the collective liberation movement for immigrants rights and humane rights in general, as all of us with loving hearts should do in the spirit of solidarity. Chicanos and Latinos in general have great potential that we need to make manifest by creative local community organizing, linking up with our natural allies and framing the whole immigrant rights issue in a new context. Simply, reform will not be enough in the long run. Reformists are liberals who fail to see the urgency of questioning the entire moral authority of the United States Government to dictate to the world what is right and what is wrong.

We have the moral right and duty to offer sanctuary to all who seek safety from an unjust government. Our bloodlines go back to the very beginnings of these lands I call Aztlan!  
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win! Amnesty Now!

~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/   

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s