Saturday, May 08, 2010

Covert Economic Agenda Beneath Immigration Reform by Shamus Cooke

Join Up Raza y Todos ~ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/
We will never advance La Causa without learning how to wisely use Social Media in this New Millennium! ~Che Peta

http://bit.ly/at1ZHL


Covert Economic Agenda Beneath Immigration Reform

by Shamus Cooke          

Global Research, May 4, 2010

 

How convenient for Goldman Sachs.  Just as most working people were demanding that the Goldman bosses and other Wall Street criminals either be massively fined, jailed or worse, the nation's attention is suddenly forced to react to the racist immigration law in Arizona.   And although the two incidents are not directly related, they represent a trend that is likely to increase in the months and years ahead.

 

Because of the economic crisis, massive unemployment, corporate bailouts, home foreclosures, and criminal activity of Wall Street, the majority of people in the U.S. have never been as passionately anti-corporation.  But the corporate owned media plus the wealthy, elite-controlled Congress reacted quickly to these intolerable circumstances and fought back.

 

They took the fight over public opinion to the airwaves, and massively pushed the blame for the dismal state of the U.S. economy onto those unable to defend themselves — immigrants.

 

One can either focus their political rage on the billionaires who dominate the economy and Congress —Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, etc. — or those millions of undocumented immigrants, many who get paid lower than minimum wage and are living in society's shadows.

 

The corporate media would rather you focus on immigrants.  Thus, Fox News and virtually all other media outlets spew nightly venom at a vulnerable public, looking to get revenge on immigrants who "ruined America."  There is an obvious connection to this type of racist propaganda and the increase in hate crimes against Latinos that has exploded over the years.

 

Latinos are blamed for everything from lower wages, violent and non-violent crimes, to just about everything else.  There is no exaggeration to say that Hitler played a similar blame-game for Germany's economic and social woes with Jews and other minorities.

 

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles was quoted in The New York Times when he correctly pointed out:  "Every time we have an economic downturn, there is a new attack on immigrants…"  (May 1, 2010).

 

The right-wing exploits this claim when they accuse immigrants of lowering the wages of "native" U.S. workers, but the full truth of why a tidal wave of immigrants entered the U.S. is never told.

 

In reality, the same Wall Street corporations that in part caused the current recession and benefited from it via bailouts are also responsible for the destruction of the Mexican economy and the consequent migration wave.

 

Bill Clinton's 1994 "Mexican bailout" was supposedly used to save the Mexican economy from disaster.  In reality, much of the money went to Wall Street investors who helped inflate the Mexican economy but didn't get out in time when the bubble burst (similar to the recent housing bubble in the U.S.).

 

Bill Clinton used U.S. taxpayer money to bailout Wall Street via the Mexican government, but Mexico still had to pay back the money that went to Wall Street.  The Mexican loan came with devastating strings attached:  state industries were to be privatized; the Mexican currency was devalued; state workers were fired by the hundreds of thousands; and social services were slashed.  The ruinous results sent hordes of desperate Mexicans north to escape poverty and starvation.

 

When this massive fraud was being orchestrated, Republican Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato continued his opposition to Clinton by actually telling the truth about the bailout: "The rescue plan has failed. And we are just perpetuating a myth if we think we are helping anyone except rich investors, who the United States has saved while everyone else in Mexico starves."  (The New York Times, April 2, 1995).

 

Who benefits?

 

U.S. Corporations.  The Mexican economy was cracked open to rich U.S. investors who take advantage of slave wages south of the border, while also benefiting from the Mexican migration to the U.S. that corporations use to drive down wages in the U.S. (corporations in the U.S. massively advertised in Mexico to bring more workers across the border).

 

If Latino immigrants in the U.S. are not afforded basic civil rights — including the right to form unions without being deported — they become easily exploitable by corporations; wages for all workers in the U.S. consequently drop.  This sad state of affairs will continue if the Democrats' anti-immigration bill is passed.

 

But the Democrats are given a right-wing shield for their new policy by the extremely racist Arizona law.   The conservative Washington Post analyzed the Democrats plan in an article accurately entitled: "Senate Democrats' Plan Highlights Nation's Shift to the Right on Immigration."  However, it is the Democratic Congress that is shifting right, not the "nation" (minus the Fox News far right).  

 

The article reports that the Democrats' plan "includes a slew of new immigration enforcement measures aimed at U.S. borders and workplaces. It would further expand the 20,000-member Border Patrol; triple fines against U.S. employers that hire illegal immigrants; and, most controversially, require all American workers — citizens and non-citizens alike — to get new Social Security cards linked to their fingerprints to ease work eligibility checks."  (May 1, 2010).

 

And: 

    "Critics of the [Democrats'] law… said its enforcement will open a window on the huge social, economic and government costs of removing 11 million people, as well as the constitutional challenges of doing so without racial profiling or expanding police powers. Most Americans do not want that, they say, but firm and fair policies that uphold the law, bolster U.S. workers and the economy, and respect the nation's immigrant heritage."

 

Obama and the Democrats have again betrayed another key constituency.  Their shift to the right is the outcome of a crumbling economy that cannot be corrected without directly confronting the gigantic wealth and power of U.S. corporations.  These corporations control the Democratic Party, who can only respond by the same immigrant scapegoating that the Republicans advocate.  

 

To shield themselves from popular anger, the U.S. corporate elite is promoting the most right-wing ideas to millions of people, so that social passions can be channeled towards society's victims: immigrants, minorities, homosexuals, women who choose to get an abortion, etc.  Workers organized in unions are also being targeted.

 

If the fragile U.S. economy crashes again, these dangerous ideas will find more receptive ears.  At the height of the Great Depression, when working-class Americans started to fight back against corporate interests, the US government intervened to shift the countries focus:  thousands of Latino immigrants and citizens were rounded up on trains and shipped to Mexico.

 

To combat immigrant scapegoating, immigrants, all workers and progressive people must demand and fight that corporations and the rich shareholders pay for the economic crisis through progressive income and corporate taxes, while also demanding that ICE workplace raids, detentions and deportations be stopped immediately!

 

Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action (www.workerscompass.org).  He can be reached at shamuscook@yahoo.com

 

Shamus Cooke is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Shamus Cooke

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18980
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://www.facebook.com/Peta51
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s



From: "chicano11@earthlink.net" <chicano11@earthlink.net>
To: Alberto Rojas / CC LCLAA LRN <nadm916@aol.com>; Eric Vega/ CC & LRN <sac86880@csus.edu>; Rev Ashiya Odeye/ CC LRN <therev@justicereformcoalition.org>; Betty Williams/NAACP Pres & CR <higherhop@aol.com>; Teresa Coatlalopeuh/CC & LRN <tmichael2000@hotmail.com>; Frank Gonzales/ W Sac LULAC LRN <dgonzalez916@sbcglobal.net>; Linda Roberts/ Campaign <lroberts58@att.net>; Lino Pedres / Justice for Janitors <lino.pedresl@seiu-usww.org>; Xavier Rivera/CC LRN <rivera@surewest.net>; Xico González <revoltoso@gmail.com>; Mario Galvan <mario@zsc.org>; Mario Moreno / CC <razadelrio@yahoo.com>; Maria Miranda / CC Aztec Dancers LRN <mmiranda@mutualassistance.org>; Rayna Mejia / Aztic Dancers LRN <Miktlantekuhtli31@yahoo.com>; Silvia Moran/CC <silviamoran48@sbcglobal.net>; Joaquin Galvan <jdgalvan@ucdavis.edu>; Peter S. Lopez/CC LRN <peter.lopez51@yahoo.com>; Tony Hernandez/ CC & CR <hernant@imail.losrios.edu>; Tony Perez/CC LRN <ganasperez@yahoo.com>; Armando Ayala / LRN Education- CC 07 <drchili@webtv.net>; Armando Navarro/ UC Riverside NAHR <armando.navarro@ucr.edu>; Pablo Espinoza / Latino Caucus <pablo.espinoza@asm.ca.gov>; Xochitl Arrellano / Gil Cedillos Office <Xochitl1@comcast.com>; Rafael Aguilera / CC LRN <Rafael@theverdegroup.org>; Cristina Mora/ CC LRN <cmora@cccco.edu>
Sent: Sat, May 8, 2010 1:25:38 PM
Subject: Fw: Blaming La Raza

 Hi Everyone

 

 Hope everyone is having a great Mothers Day weekend.

 Just wanted to pass this along, take care and have a great one...

 

 Efren G.


-----Forwarded Message-----
From: Ruben
Sent: May 6, 2010 5:34 AM
To: Colorings , La Raza USA , Mamas Y Papas Fritas , Pro Immigration , American Union
Subject: Blaming La Raza


 
Covert Economic Agenda Beneath Immigration Reform


google_ad_client = "pub-1591488516340780"; /* 200x200, created 11/9/09 */ google_ad_slot = "9178639779"; google_ad_width = 200; google_ad_height = 200; google_protectAndRun("render_ads.js::google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad); google_ad_client = "pub-1591488516340780";/* 200x200, created 5/22/09 */google_ad_slot = "1471974688";google_ad_width = 200;google_ad_height = 200; google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);
Global Research, May 4, 2010

 


How convenient for Goldman Sachs.  Just as most working people were demanding that the Goldman bosses and other Wall Street criminals either be massively fined, jailed or worse, the nation's attention is suddenly forced to react to the racist immigration law in Arizona.   And although the two incidents are not directly related, they represent a trend that is likely to increase in the months and years ahead. 

 

Because of the economic crisis, massive unemployment, corporate bailouts, home foreclosures, and criminal activity of Wall Street, the majority of people in the U.S. have never been as passionately anti-corporation.  But the corporate owned media plus the wealthy, elite-controlled Congress reacted quickly to these intolerable circumstances and fought back. 

 

They took the fight over public opinion to the airwaves, and massively pushed the blame for the dismal state of the U.S. economy onto those unable to defend themselves — immigrants.

 

One can either focus their political rage on the billionaires who dominate the economy and Congress —Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, etc. — or those millions of undocumented immigrants, many who get paid lower than minimum wage and are living in society's shadows. 

 

The corporate media would rather you focus on immigrants.  Thus, Fox News and virtually all other media outlets spew nightly venom at a vulnerable public, looking to get revenge on immigrants who "ruined America."  There is an obvious connection to this type of racist propaganda and the increase in hate crimes against Latinos that has exploded over the years. 

 

Latinos are blamed for everything from lower wages, violent and non-violent crimes, to just about everything else.  There is no exaggeration to say that Hitler played a similar blame-game for Germany's economic and social woes with Jews and other minorities. 

  

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles was quoted in The New York Times when he correctly pointed out:  "Every time we have an economic downturn, there is a new attack on immigrants…"  (May 1, 2010).

 

The right-wing exploits this claim when they accuse immigrants of lowering the wages of "native" U.S. workers, but the full truth of why a tidal wave of immigrants entered the U.S. is never told. 

 

In reality, the same Wall Street corporations that in part caused the current recession and benefited from it via bailouts are also responsible for the destruction of the Mexican economy and the consequent migration wave. 

 

Bill Clinton's 1994 "Mexican bailout" was supposedly used to save the Mexican economy from disaster.  In reality, much of the money went to Wall Street investors who helped inflate the Mexican economy but didn't get out in time when the bubble burst (similar to the recent housing bubble in the U.S.). 

 

Bill Clinton used U.S. taxpayer money to bailout Wall Street via the Mexican government, but Mexico still had to pay back the money that went to Wall Street.  The Mexican loan came with devastating strings attached:  state industries were to be privatized; the Mexican currency was devalued; state workers were fired by the hundreds of thousands; and social services were slashed.  The ruinous results sent hordes of desperate Mexicans north to escape poverty and starvation.

 

When this massive fraud was being orchestrated, Republican Senator Alfonse M. D'Amato continued his opposition to Clinton by actually telling the truth about the bailout: "The rescue plan has failed. And we are just perpetuating a myth if we think we are helping anyone except rich investors, who the United States has saved while everyone else in Mexico starves."  (The New York Times, April 2, 1995).

 

Who benefits?

 

U.S. Corporations.  The Mexican economy was cracked open to rich U.S. investors who take advantage of slave wages south of the border, while also benefiting from the Mexican migration to the U.S. that corporations use to drive down wages in the U.S. (corporations in the U.S. massively advertised in Mexico to bring more workers across the border). 

 

If Latino immigrants in the U.S. are not afforded basic civil rights — including the right to form unions without being deported — they become easily exploitable by corporations; wages for all workers in the U.S. consequently drop.  This sad state of affairs will continue if the Democrats' anti-immigration bill is passed.


But the Democrats are given a right-wing shield for their new policy by the extremely racist Arizona law.   The conservative Washington Post analyzed the Democrats plan in an article accurately entitled: "Senate Democrats' Plan Highlights Nation's Shift to the Right on Immigration."  However, it is the Democratic Congress that is shifting right, not the "nation" (minus the Fox News far right).   

 

The article reports that the Democrats' plan "includes a slew of new immigration enforcement measures aimed at U.S. borders and workplaces. It would further expand the 20,000-member Border Patrol; triple fines against U.S. employers that hire illegal immigrants; and, most controversially, require all American workers — citizens and non-citizens alike — to get new Social Security cards linked to their fingerprints to ease work eligibility checks."  (May 1, 2010). 

 

And:  


"Critics of the [Democrats'] law… said its enforcement will open a window on the huge social, economic and government costs of removing 11 million people, as well as the constitutional challenges of doing so without racial profiling or expanding police powers. Most Americans do not want that, they say, but firm and fair policies that uphold the law, bolster U.S. workers and the economy, and respect the nation's immigrant heritage."


Obama and the Democrats have again betrayed another key constituency.  Their shift to the right is the outcome of a crumbling economy that cannot be corrected without directly confronting the gigantic wealth and power of U.S. corporations.  These corporations control the Democratic Party, who can only respond by the same immigrant scapegoating that the Republicans advocate.   

 

To shield themselves from popular anger, the U.S. corporate elite is promoting the most right-wing ideas to millions of people, so that social passions can be channeled towards society's victims: immigrants, minorities, homosexuals, women who choose to get an abortion, etc.  Workers organized in unions are also being targeted.

 

If the fragile U.S. economy crashes again, these dangerous ideas will find more receptive ears.  At the height of the Great Depression, when working-class Americans started to fight back against corporate interests, the US government intervened to shift the countries focus:  thousands of Latino immigrants and citizens were rounded up on trains and shipped to Mexico. 

 

To combat immigrant scapegoating, immigrants, all workers and progressive people must demand and fight that corporations and the rich shareholders pay for the economic crisis through progressive income and corporate taxes, while also demanding that ICE workplace raids, detentions and deportations be stopped immediately! 

 

Shamus Cooke is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action (www.workerscompass.org).  He can be reached at shamuscook@yahoo.com


Shamus Cooke is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Shamus Cooke

 
~~~~~~
Ruben


Thursday, May 06, 2010

Echo: Legal Defender Isabel Garcia: Arizona Bill Forcing Officers to Determine Immigration Status Marks “All-Out Assault” on Latino Communities

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/4/16/az

April 16, 2010

Legal Defender Isabel Garcia: Arizona Bill Forcing Officers to Determine Immigration Status Marks "All-Out Assault" on Latino Communities

Immigration_web

Arizona lawmakers have approved what's being described as the harshest anti-immigrant measure in the country, forcing police officers to determine the immigration status of someone they suspect of being an undocumented immigrant. Meanwhile, over fifty people were arrested Thursday in a federal immigration sweep targeting van operators allegedly involved in smuggling in undocumented migrants from Mexico. We speak to Isabel Garcia, co-chair of the Tuscon-based Coalition for Human Rights and legal defender of Pima County, Arizona. [includes rush transcript]

Filed under Immigration

Guest:

Isabel Garcia, co-chair of Coalición de Derechos Humanos, or the Coalition for Human Rights, a Tucson-based organization. She is also the legal defender of Pima County, Arizona and won the Lannan Foundation Cultural Freedom Award in 2008 and the 2006 National Human Rights Award from Mexico's National Commission for Human Rights.


JUAN GONZALEZ: In Arizona, state lawmakers have approved what's being described as the harshest anti-immigrant measure in the country. On Tuesday, the Arizona House of Representatives voted to force police officers to determine the immigration status of someone they suspect of being an undocumented immigrant. The state Senate passed a similar measure earlier this year, and Republican Governor Jan Brewer is expected to sign it into law. 


Introduced by State Senator Russell Pearce, the bill would give an unprecedented amount of immigration enforcement power to local police officers. Immigrant rights and civil liberties groups in the state have vowed to challenge the new bill, warning that it will only increase racial profiling.


AMY GOODMAN: Meanwhile, federal law enforcement agencies mounted a massive operation across Arizona Thursday targeting van operators allegedly involved in smuggling undocumented migrants from Mexico. Nearly fifty people were arrested, and more than 800 federal agents were involved in the bust, that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is touting as its largest-ever human smuggling case.

For more on what's happening in Arizona, we're joined here in New York by Isabel Garcia, the co-chair of the Coalition of Human Rights, a Tucson-based organization. She's also the legal defender of Pima County, Arizona, and won the Lannan Foundation Cultural Freedom Award in 2008 and the 2006 National Human Rights Award from Mexico's National Commission for Human Rights.

Welcome to Democracy Now!


ISABEL GARCIA: Thank you very much.

AMY GOODMAN: Let's start with the legislation. Can you explain what legislators have just passed?

ISABEL GARCIA: Yes. This legislature is probably the most extreme legislature in this country. This particular bill is intended to clean up everything they've not been able to do in the past few years, obligating police officers to determine immigration status, really giving racial profiling, of course, its largest boost, converting it to its most important law enforcement technique.


This law would also create a new crime in the state. If you're undocumented in the state, you would be

guilty of a trespass. People would have a private right of action, if police and other agencies didn't determine immigration status. Immigration status would have to be shared by all agencies. It criminalizes day workers, day labor workers, whether you're trying to hire somebody or whether they're trying to be hired.


And so, of course, it represents for us an all-out assault on our communities, guaranteeing that Arizona, in fact, is the engine for all of the anti-immigrant legislation and politicians in this country, with apparently eleven states poised to follow suit, if in fact Governor Brewer signs this bill.


JUAN GONZALEZ: When you say criminalizing even day laborers, I was struck by—one part of the law would prohibit people from blocking traffic when they seek or offer day labor on the streets. So this would be—allow a license, basically, for the police to really target day laborers across the state.


ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely. For instance, in New York City here, you wave a cab, and when they pull over, of course, it blocks traffic for a few seconds. That's exactly what would be criminalized in all of the state of Arizona, guaranteeing, of course, that day laborers could not be out looking for work. We've criminalized work in the state of Arizona.


AMY GOODMAN: Who is the engine for this?

ISABEL GARCIA: Well, Russell Pearce is the author, but ultimately—

AMY GOODMAN: He is a state legislator.

ISABEL GARCIA: Yes, he's a senator in the state legislature. But ultimately, it really is our federal policy. Beginning in 1994, Arizona was pretty much selected to be the place to funnel all immigrants, to create chaos, division, eventually leading to the election of anti-immigrant politicians, from, as you know, the Sheriff Arpaio there, Andrew Thomas, who just recently resigned to run for attorney general. And Arpaio states he's going to run for governor, too. The superintendent of schools is an anti-immigrant. And, of course, Russell Pearce is joined by an entire gang of extremists in the legislature. So I really put the onus and blame on the federal government, in addition to the state government, for funneling and purposely creating Arizona as the laboratory for all of these anti-immigrant measures.


JUAN GONZALEZ: Now, those who defend these measures say that Arizona has become the main transit point along the 2,000-mile border with Mexico for undocumented migrants coming over.

ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely.

JUAN GONZALEZ: What is the situation in southern Arizona in terms of migrants? And is there any—

ISABEL GARCIA: Yes.

JUAN GONZALEZ: —legitimacy to the concerns of folks that Arizona has become like the main doorway now to illegal immigration to the country?

ISABEL GARCIA: Yes, Arizona is, in fact, the doorway. Over 50 percent of all crossings occur through Arizona. Again, it was purposeful.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And why is that?

ISABEL GARCIA: It was purposeful. Beginning in 1994, we began with this prevention through deterrence, but really with military-type operations—Operation Gatekeeper in California; Operation Blockade, and then became Hold the Line, in the El Paso area; Rio Grande in the rest of Texas; and unfortunately, in Arizona, Operation Safeguard, that has resulted of course in the deaths of thousands of immigrants along the border.


So, yes, they're correct that Arizona has become the gateway. New York Times reported that that area, in fact, was the bottleneck for all of America, North America. But that was purposeful, in fact intended. We believe so, because not only is a very conservative state, but the border is owned basically by the federal government, the state government and the Tohono O'odham Nation, which, for the most part, we ignore as much as we can.


And so, as a result, we have created Arizona to be the place where traffickers come, smugglers come. We have made smuggling an incredibly profitable business. Prior to 1994, people did not require the use of a smuggler. Now most people need a smuggler. But instead of catching smugglers—imagine, 800 agents to—ICE agents descending on Arizona with ski masks and armor like you can't believe and vehicles and helicopters to arrest forty to fifty people? It's really absurd justification, when we know that it's an all-out assault on the public and the community, right at the heels of this legislation passing, and this operation coming forward, when really we're not interested in the smugglers in Maricopa County. They have convicted hundreds and hundreds of people who have simply crossed and admitted that they were going to pay a smuggler. They're the ones that are being prosecuted as being smugglers, as co-conspirators to their own smuggling.


And unfortunately, the courts have not been of much help. They have upheld almost every single piece of legislation that we believe is unconstitutional, illegal, a federal grab. And yet, they've been okayed by the courts.


AMY GOODMAN: Isabel Garcia, how does the new legislation compare to the 287(g) agreements?

ISABEL GARCIA: Well, 287(g), as you know, is a federal program that has two models. One is the field model that Joe Arpaio became the poster child for. And then the jail model. In spite of his massive violations and, you know, having—

AMY GOODMAN: And for people, just very quickly, who don't know who Sheriff Arpaio is?


ISABEL GARCIA: He's the sheriff in Maricopa County who has made it his mission to be the most visible anti-immigrant in the country. He's authored a book and made profits, and of course has become the poster child for all of them. He was the person who instituted 287(g) with a vengeance, even though he violated so many rights. He was only limited not to do the federal—I mean, the field model, and that permits—that permitted those agents to, in fact, determine citizenship and residency. He states, "I don't care if I've been stripped of 287(g) field model, I have Arizona laws"—that, by the way, were signed by our now-Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano—"I have those state laws to enforce, and so I don't care if I have a 287(g) or not." So it's a 287(g) institutionalized on the state.

AMY GOODMAN: We have a clip of Glenn Beck interviewing Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

    SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO: Local law enforcement comes across some people that have a erratic or scared or whatever—you know.

    GLENN BECK: Demeanor?

    SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO: They're worried. And if they have their speech, what they look like, if they just look like they came from another country, we can take care of that situation. But I don't need that anyway, Glenn.

    GLENN BECK: Wait, wait, wait. Are you telling—hang on, hang on, hang on.

    SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO: I can still do the job.

    GLENN BECK: When was that—when was that law written? Because all I hear about is, that sounds like profiling. And the government is saying you can't profile anybody.

    SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO: Well, that law, in 1996, part of the comprehensive law that was passed, it's in there. It's in there.

AMY GOODMAN: That's Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Isabel Garcia?

ISABEL GARCIA: Yes, that's Joe Arpaio. And as other clips that people have seen him on the television, he has stated upfront he does not care what the federal government tells him. He is going to enforce the laws in Arizona, even though it is driving the economy downward. The situation for our communities, of course, is really acute. People yesterday were scrambling, didn't send people to school, didn't go to work. And, of course, the south side, where my mother still lives, was under full-out assault.

JUAN GONZALEZ: That's the south side of Tucson.

ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely. Under the guise of going after a few shuttle companies, come on. Eight hundred ICE agents, together with US marshals, local police officers, stopped traffic in that part of town.


JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, there was an expectation by many supporters of Barack Obama that once he got into office, these massive type raids would stop and that there would be some effort at some kind of comprehensive immigration reform. There's been some now increased talk about it in recent weeks. What is your—what is your assessment of the first year of Obama administration and your hopes for some kind of change in immigration policy in the future?


ISABEL GARCIA: Well, unfortunately, under the Obama administration, we've seen more deportations than under any other administration. Not that he's more anti-immigrant, but Democrat administrations, as well as Republican administrations, have continued to build the enforcement buildup, and therefore it's not a surprise to us that there's more and more deportations.


Unfortunately, this administration is responsible for yesterday's assault on our community. This administration continues to follow the flawed concept that migration is somehow a law enforcement or national security issue. And it is not. It is a economic, social, political phenomenon. And until we begin to address root cause and—for instance, what NAFTA has done to the agriculture in Mexico, displacing millions of workers, flooding of course to the United States. They knew they would flood in here. That's why they began to build walls in 1994. They didn't build the walls, as some people would believe, on September the 12th of 2001. We began building those walls in 1994. So we're very disappointed with this administration.


AMY GOODMAN: Isabel Garcia, I wanted to ask you about the money that Arizona has to do this. I mean, you have, last month, Arizona becoming the first state to eliminate SCHIP, right, the Children's Health Insurance Program—

ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely.

AMY GOODMAN: —leaving tens of thousands of kids without coverage. The Arizona governor signed a new budget canceling the program, which also—which covered 47,000 low-income kids. The move coincided with cuts to Medicaid coverage for childless adults, dropping an additional 310,000 people from the rolls. So where is the money coming from?


ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely. We are seeing a downward dive in our economy, precisely because we are so anti-immigrant, in addition to, of course, the economic woes of this country. Not only what you've stated, but we have eliminated the full-day kindergarten. We're at the bottom of the list in terms of the states for funding for education. We have eliminated, wholesale, all funding for GED adult education. And the cuts go on and on. At the same time, they're attempting to give tax cuts, of course, to corporations and businesses. And so, we are on a real downward spiral.


And of course they pluck out the immigrant, as they have historically, to blame all the societal ills, in spite of the fact that there's recently been very credible studies to show that the undocumented labor force represent almost a billion dollars in terms of a net gain, when you subtract all of the costs that are associated with undocumented immigrants. You know very well we don't have 12 million people here on welfare or—because we're benevolent. We have 12 million undocumented people here because our economy depends on it, and the state economies depend on them.


JUAN GONZALEZ: And Janet Napolitano obviously, the head of Homeland Security, is your former governor.

ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Did you have any expectation that she would be—take on these kind of policies when she was governor?


ISABEL GARCIA: We knew she became the Department of Homeland Security Secretary precisely because of her war on immigrants. She, too, is quite responsible for the buildup in Arizona. She signed, as she stated, the toughest employer sanction laws, that now have been copied by Mississippi and other states. She signed a bill making workers criminals, agreeing to sign the bill that says if you use a fictitious Social Security number—of course, contributing to the Social Security suspense fund, over $200 billion worth—that you are guilty of being an aggravated identity thief. So she called the National Guard on the borders. So we did not expect anything good when Obama, President Obama, appointed Janet Napolitano to this position.


AMY GOODMAN: A few years ago, May Day was huge for immigrants' rights marchers around the country. What are your plans for this May Day? And what are your demands right now?


ISABEL GARCIA: We are planning, of course, massive May Day mobilizations across the country. Ours in Tucson, of course, will be very clear. Our demands will be that we, number one, not demand just immigration reform. We want details. We are not in agreement with the four pillars, as spelled out by Senators Schumer and Graham, that continue that flawed analysis as immigrants committing a crime. We have to get off of that and recognize it. So we're demanding that the enforcement stop, that we stop resourcing the billion-dollar structure that is going along the border, a militarization, of course, that is creeping up into the United States. I mean, Julie Myers, in 2006, at the Swift plants, announced what we've been saying all along: remember, this is signaling that enforcement will not remain at the border; it will go interior. And it has. So that's our first demand.


Our second demand is that we immediately address the root cause, that if we're interested about migration and the suffering of people coming into this country—the eighty-six people that we have already found in the state of Arizona at the border as of three or four weeks ago—we want a stop to that. And we need also a reform that reflects the reality. We should legalize the 12 million people here and begin to address those issues along the border that have caused so much suffering, environmental degradation and devastation by the Border Patrol and ICE and other agencies.


And so, our demands are huge. And we know that we're going against even the prominent immigrant rights groups that are following the framework that is being spelled out by the Senators Schumer and Graham.


JUAN GONZALEZ: One final question, the immigrant rights movement that had such a huge outpouring in 2006, subsequently fractured between what I would call the more grassroots organizations, that supplied the people power, and the national groups, the trade unions, the Catholic Church and some of the major Washington immigration groups, that urged a more realistic compromise approach to legislation, what's your—how is the movement faring these days in terms of the tension between these two wings of the movement?


ISABEL GARCIA: Well, unfortunately, the brokers, that you've stated very clearly here for us, have really attempted to co-opt the grassroots movements. As you saw, maybe 200,000, 500,000 people marched on Washington, DC, and of course the brokers and those that handled the march and handled the message, I hate to say, used the people that marched onto DC.


I think that there's a great opportunity for the grassroots immigrant rights people to actually come forward now, because people are questioning: what do you mean I should just call and ask for comprehensive immigration reform? What does that mean? We will not accept any reform. And we can see that the millions and millions of dollars that have been spent by these organizations promoting a campaign-type, rather than a movement-building, you know, phenomenon—they should have spent some of that money educating the American public about the realities of immigration, the immigration situation, immigration laws and immigration history in this country. We have to begin to know the truth. And a lot of immigrant rights groups are, in fact, challenging those brokers and those messages as we speak today.


AMY GOODMAN: I think it is very important to point out that weekend, it was the anniversary of the invasion of Iraq weekend, the march on Washington, 200,000 to 500,000 immigrant rights protesters, the comparison of the size of that to the Tea Party rally that also took place, and then you compare the coverage—

ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely.

AMY GOODMAN: —of the couple thousand people at the Tea Party rally versus the 200,000 to 500,000 people who rallied for immigrants' rights. I think most people in this country did not realize that was going on.

ISABEL GARCIA: Absolutely.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now! Isabel Garcia, thanks so much for being with us.

ISABEL GARCIA: Thank you.

AMY GOODMAN: Co-chair of Coalición de Derechos Humanos, Coalition for Human Rights, which is based in Tucson, Arizona. We're glad to have you here in New York for a few minutes.

ISABEL GARCIA: Thank you so much.


http://www.democracynow.org/2010/4/16/az
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://www.facebook.com/Peta51
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s


Pima County Sheriff Refuses to Enforce “Unconstitutional” Controversial AZ Anti-Immigrant Law

http://bit.ly/cZwzLV

May 06, 2010

Pima County Sheriff Refuses to Enforce "Unconstitutional" Controversial AZ Anti-Immigrant Law

Dupnik-graphic

Protests continue across the country to denounce Arizona's controversial new anti-immigrant law, which allows police officers to stop and interrogate anyone they suspect is an undocumented immigrant. We go to Arizona to speak with Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, who calls the law "unconstitutional" and says he won't enforce it. [Includes rush transcript]

Filed under Immigration



Guest:

Clarence Dupnik, sheriff of Pima County, Arizona.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Welcome to all of our listeners and viewers around the country and around the world. Protests continue across the country to denounce Arizona's controversial new anti-immigrant law which allows police officers to stop and interrogate anyone they suspect is an undocumented immigrant. On Tuesday, city councils in the Arizona cities of Flagstaff and Tucson both passed measures to sue the state over the new law. The state's professional basketball team, the Phoenix Suns, wore shirts reading "Los Suns" last night in a tribute to Cinco de Mayo and to voice their opposition to the law. Steve Kerr, the team's general manager, said the law "Rings up images of Nazi Germany." Student protests have occurred in Arizona and other states. On Wednesday, seventy students from five Flagstaff schools walked out of classes, and at the University of California at Berkeley about seventy students have entered their fourth day of a hunger strike. The Rev. Al Sharpton traveled to Phoenix Wednesday to voice his support for a boycott of Arizona. And at the White House, President Obama weighed-in on the law during a celebration of Cinco de Mayo.

    PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Today reminds us that America's diversity is America's strength. That's why I spoke out against the recently-passed law in Arizona. [APPLAUSE] Make no mistake, our immigration system is broken. After so many years in which Washington has failed to meet its responsibilities, Americans are right to be frustrated, including folks along border states. But the answer isn't to undermine fundamental principles that define us as a nation. We can't start singling-out people because of who they look like or how they talk or how they dress. We can't turn law-abiding American citizens and law-abiding immigrants into subjects of suspicion and abuse. We can't divide the American people that way. That's not the answer. That's not who we are as the United States of America. And that's why I have instructed my administration to closely monitor the new law in Arizona, to examine the civil rights and other implications that it may have, that's why we have to close the door on this kind of misconceived action by meeting our obligations here in Washington.


AMY GOODMAN: President Obama speaking on Cinco de Mayo on Wednesday. The Arizona law has also been met with resistance by some top law enforcement officials in Arizona. Our first guest today is Clarence Dupnik, Sheriff of Pima County in Arizona. The county includes the city of Tucson and over 120 miles of the Arizona/Mexico border. He recently wrote an article in The Wall Street Journal titled "Arizona's Immigration Mistake." Clarence Dupnik, Sheriff of Pima County in Arizona, we welcome you to DEMOCRACY NOW!

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: : Thank you very much.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you tell us why you think this law is a mistake and what you're doing about it?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: Sure. First of all, the law is totally unnecessary. We already have the authority to stop and detain illegal immigrants and turn them over to the Border Patrol and we do that on a regular daily basis. This law will have no impact whatsoever on illegal immigration. None at all. We already have the authority. We didn't need it. What the law now does is put us in a position where we are damned if we do and damned if we don't, because on one hand we get sued by people who think we are illegally profiling and there is a clause in the law which I've never heard of in any other law, and I have been the Sheriff here for thirty years, that says any citizen who doesn't think we are enforcing this law can sue us. That is just outrageous. It's an anti-law enforcement law in my opinion. Puts us in an impossible situation. It puts us in an impossible situation with the Hispanic community. What they've done is driven a wedge between us and the Hispanic community. We depend on our community, Hispanics especially, for information, for cooperation in our crime-fighting efforts. What we really need to stop illegal immigration is more federal assistance on securing that border and we desperately need reform of immigration laws.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Sheriff, what about- you've raised, especially, questions about the standard for stopping people, the reasonable suspicion standard. Can you talk about that and your concerns about what that opens the door to?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: You bet. When the law was first passed, which would have been about nine days ago, there was a clause that said 'reasonable suspicion of anybody.' Every Hispanic in this country, especially in Arizona, must have awakened, and I've talked to many of them personally, the next day to feel like they've been kicked in the teeth, like they're now second-class citizens, they have a target on their back because when they leave the house they're going to have to take papers with them and prepare to be stopped and questioned. That, overnight, has made Hispanics second-class citizens.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain what it is you actually are supposed to do if you were to enforce this law? The issue of reasonable suspicion. What do your sheriffs do? What do you do?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: Well, let me tell you what we do now, and I don't anticipate doing anything differently. I don't think the new law precludes state and local law enforcement from turning over immigrants, illegal immigrants, to the border patrol. But in the routine course of our duties, when we encounter illegal immigrants, and there are a variety of ways that that happens, especially out in the rural desert areas, once we determine that they are in fact illegal, we call the Border Patrol and turn them over to them. But if we were to enforce this law, what- you know, the people that passed this law are very quick to complain about government overstepping, which is one of their biggest complaints, and the second one is taxation. If we were to start enforcing this law instead of turning them over to the Border Patrol like we do now, we would have to put them the Pima County Jail. We would put the jail into a crisis over night. We would have to overwhelm the rest of the criminal justice system locally here and send the taxpayers a huge bill which is just nonsense, in my opinion. It's irresponsible of the legislature to do this, and it would be irresponsible of me to do it as well.

JUAN GONZALEZ: but now, your county also includes a significant section of border area right there in southern Arizona. What do you say to those people in Arizona and other parts of the country who say that something has to be done to control the numbers of people who continue to pour into the United Stated over the border from Mexico?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: I would say to them what I just finished saying to you. The federal government needs to do a lot more to stop illegal immigration. One of the things they need to do is illegal reform. I understand that and they understand that as well. This isn't rocket science. But a few years ago when the Bush administration militarized the border with the National Guardsmen, they put handcuffs on them. They weren't allowed to do anything related to illegal aliens. They couldn't even drive a bus that had illegal aliens in it. What we need to do is to put more people on the border to secure it, more technology, and more agents. But we really need reform.

JUAN GONZALEZ: What about the issue that within days the Legislature attempted to amend the bill that had just passed? What were the amendments that they made and did it really have any substantive impact on the original legislation?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: It going to take legal experts with better legal minds than my own to answer that question. But the change that they made a week ago ,Thursday night before they adjourned, was they said you can't use race, ethnicity, or country of origin solely as a reason for a stop.

AMY GOODMAN: Could you be in legal trouble for not enforcing the law, Sheriff?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: Well, that's a question that lawyers are going to have to address. But in my opinion is that we are enforcing the law. If we're arresting illegal aliens and turning them over to the Border Patrol, that seems to be a far better approach from every point of view than what the legislature has done to us.

AMY GOODMAN: Your police chief, the Tucson Police Chief, Roberto Villaseñor, says he's worried about the impact of the law on investigations with victims and witnesses who might be afraid to come forward. He said he's opposing the law's enactment but will work to see that it's implemented fairly in Tucson. Are you working with Chief Villaseñor?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: All of law enforcement in the state, I think, is working together. There are some of us who are elected officials and are taking political stands. But aside from that, there is a lot of, in my opinion, unanimity as to the problems that this law is causing for law enforcement. It's an anti-law enforcement law in my opinion.

AMY GOODMAN: How much support do you have from other aspects of law enforcement, other departments around the state?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: You know, the truth of the matter is, I do not really know.

AMY GOODMAN: Have you spoken to the Governor, Governor Brewer?

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: I have not.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, we want to thank you for being with us, Sheriff of Pima County Arizona, speaking to us from Tucson. Thanks so much for joining us.

SHERIFF CLARENCE DUPNIK: Thanks for inviting me.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, the War and Peace Report. We will be back in a minute.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/5/6/pima_country_sheriff_refuses_to_enforce
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://www.facebook.com/Peta51
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s