Saturday, July 03, 2010

Obama's immigration speech echoes Bush in policy, rhetoric

<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>

http://bit.ly/dgJ2AI

 

Obama's immigration speech echoes Bush in policy, rhetoric


Both presidents took a centrist position while calling for more border security. They also favored a path to citizenship for immigrants and opposed rounding up those who were in the U.S. illegally.

By Peter Nicholas, Tribune Washington Bureau

7:18 PM PDT, July 3, 2010

 

Though he is quick to deride former President George W. Bush's performance in office, President Obama seems to think his predecessor gives a pretty good immigration speech.

 

Obama's widely publicized speech on the controversial topic Thursday closely tracks, in rhetoric and basic policy, a speech Bush gave on the same subject in May 2006.

 

Speaking at American University, Obama delivered an address intended to rally the nation behind a plan that would strengthen border security while providing a path to legal status for the estimated 12 million people living in the U.S. illegally.

 

Obama's speech was longer than the one Bush delivered four years ago — 4,100 words compared with 2,600. Bush, speaking from the Oval Office, did not have to expend words thanking people. And Obama used the occasion to recap victories on healthcare and education.

 

But in fundamental ways, the speeches carry the same message. The parallels show the two presidents — one a Republican, the other a Democrat — have staked out basically the same centrist position on immigration.

 

The speeches also reveal similarities in ways presidents of both parties communicate with the public.

 

After reading a transcript of Obama's immigration address, former Bush speechwriter Matt Latimer said in an e-mail that "this speech could almost word for word have been delivered by George W. Bush on the exact same subject. Do they just copy our old speeches?"

 

Latimer, who wrote a book called "Speech-Less" that was critical of the Bush speechwriting operation, added, "That's not a compliment."

 

The policy similarities are not that surprising. Bush, even before he ran for president, was at odds with many in his party on immigration. As governor of Texas, he challenged Republicans — including the California governor at the time, Pete Wilson — who took a hard line on immigration and wanted a crackdown on illegal immigrants.

 

Bush's position was ultimately repudiated by his party and he was repeatedly rebuffed by Republicans in Congress when he offered proposals for tightening borders but also creating a path to citizenship for immigrants.

 

A White House official said Friday he did not believe that anyone examined Bush's old speeches while drafting the Obama address. Rather, the speech was written by a member of the president's speechwriting team, with Obama providing "a good deal of writing," the official said.

 

Both speeches talk about immigrants who "live in the shadows." Both mention immigrants who came to the U.S. in search of "a better life." Both describe the U.S. as "a nation of immigrants" and reject calls to "round up" people who are here illegally.

 

And both use the same language about business. Obama said businesses "must be held accountable" for hiring undocumented workers; Bush said, "We need to hold employers to account."

 

Plunging into the body of his speech, Obama discussed how "in recent days the issue of immigration has become once more a source of fresh contention in our country." That's a reference to the strict new anti-illegal immigration law in Arizona, which has touched off protests and lawsuits.

 

Bush, in his speech, alluded to a wave of street protests in favor of an immigration overhaul, saying, "The issue of immigration stirs intense emotions, and in recent weeks, Americans have seen those emotions on display."

 

Neither Bush nor Obama wanted to be seen as neglecting border enforcement. Obama said that "government has a threshold responsibility to secure our borders," whereas Bush said that securing the border is "a basic responsibility of a sovereign state."

 

Each president laid out steps they'd taken to prevent illegal crossings, using the same multipliers. Bush said he "doubled" the size of the Border Patrol; Obama said that he "doubled" the personnel assigned to border enforcement security "task forces."

 

Yet neither claimed that the borders are impregnable. Bush said, "We do not yet have full control of the border." Obama said that the Mexican border is more secure than ever, but acknowledged that "that doesn't mean we don't have more work to do."

 

Both speeches use a device in which they rejected what they portrayed as extreme positions — blanket amnesty on the one hand, and deportation of all illegal immigrants on the other.

 

Instead of those extremes, each president said, the country should adopt a more moderate alternative in which illegal immigrants could gain legal status by meeting tough requirements.

 

Bush said immigrants must "pay their taxes" and "learn English." Obama used the same language — "pay their taxes" and "learn English," among other things.

 

And at some point in each speech, the president told an inspiring story of an immigrant who came to the U.S., joined the military and gained citizenship.

 

Bush mentioned Guadalupe Denogean from Mexico, who joined the Marines and was wounded in Iraq. Obama's example was Perla Ramos, who came to the U.S. from Mexico after the Sept. 11 attacks, joined the Navy and became a citizen.

 

peter.nicholas@latimes.com

 

Julia Love in the Washington bureau contributed to this story.

 

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-speech-20100704,0,5267110.story
<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>+<>

Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!

~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika

Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com  

http://help-matrix.ning.com/

http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan

http://www.facebook.com/Peta51

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,

make violent revolution inevitable."

~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963

c/s

 



Friday, July 02, 2010

First Address on Immigration, Obama Urges Middle Ground Between Blanket Amnesty and Mass Deportations

http://bit.ly/b9XnxD

In First Address on Immigration, Obama Urges Middle Ground Between Blanket Amnesty and Mass Deportations

Obama-immigration

President Obama delivered his first major speech on immigration Thursday, making an impassioned plea for passing comprehensive immigration reform. We play excerpts of his address, and speak to two guests: Columbia University professor Mae Ngai, author of "Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America"; and Gaby Pacheco, a 25-year old student who along with three other students completed a four-month walk from Miami to Washington, DC earlier this year, talking to people about their experience of growing up undocumented and urging the President to stop deportations.


Mae Ngai, Professor of History and Asian American studies at Columbia University. She is the author of "Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America."

Gabriela Pacheco, 25-year old Ecuador-born student who grew up undocumented in Florida. Earlier this year, she and three other students who call themselves the "Trail of Dreams" walkers walked 1,500 miles from Miami to Washington, DC calling on the President to stop deportations.

AMY GOODMAN: This is "Democracy Now!," democracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. President Obama delivered his first major speech on immigration Thursday, making an impassioned plea for passing comprehensive immigration reform. He criticized laws in Arizona like SB1070 and noted the long history but immigrant contributions to this country as well as anti-immigrant demagoguery and discrimination. Obama emphasized "In an American is not a matter of blood or birth." Speaking at the American University School of International Service in Washington, the president outlined the scope of the debate.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: The politics of who is and who is not allowed to enter this country, and on what terms, has always been contentious. And that remains true today. And it's made worse by a failure of those of us in Washington to fix a broken immigration system. There are those in the immigrants' rights community who have argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are [here] illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws on the books and put an end to deportation until we have better laws. And often this argument is framed in moral terms: Why should we punish people who are just trying to earn a living? I recognize the sense of compassion that drives this argument, but I believe such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. And it would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally. Ultimately, our nation, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and set laws for residency and citizenship. And no matter how decent they are, no matter their reasons, the 11 million who broke these laws should be held accountable. Now, if the majority of Americans are skeptical of a blanket amnesty, they are also skeptical that it is possible to round up and deport 11 million people. They know it's not possible. Such an effort would be logistically impossible and wildly expensive. Moreover, it would tear at the very fabric of this nation–– because immigrants who are here illegally are now intricately woven into that fabric.

AMY GOODMAN: He went on to lay out what he described as a "practical common-sense approach" to immigration, noting the problems with border enforcement and outlining the responsibilities of the undocumented.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Our borders will not be secure as long as our limited resources are devoted to not only stopping gangs and potential terrorists, but also the hundreds of thousands who attempt to cross each year simply to find work. That's why businesses must be held accountable if they break the law by deliberately hiring and exploiting undocumented workers. Ultimately, if the demand for undocumented workers falls, the incentive for people to come here illegally will decline as well. Finally, we have to demand responsibility from people living here illegally. They must be required to admit that they broke the law. They should be required to register, pay their taxes, pay a fine, and learn English.

AMY GOODMAN: Calling immigration reform a moral imperative, Obama said the responsibility for moving forward lies with Republicans.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I'm ready to move forward; the majority of Democrats are ready to move forward; and I believe the majority of Americans are ready to move forward. But the fact is, without bipartisan support, as we had just a few years ago, we cannot solve this problem. Reform that brings accountability to our immigration system cannot pass without Republican votes.

AMY GOODMAN: Some of the highlights of his first major address on immigration made yesterday in Washington. For more, I am joined by two guests. In New York, Mae Ngai is with us, professor of History and Asian American studies at Columbia University, author of "Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America."And on the line from Miami we are joined by Gaby Pacheco, a 25-year old student who came to this country from Ecuador when she was seven. Earlier this year, she along with three other students took a 4-month-long-walk from Miami to Washington, DC talking to people about their experience of growing up undocumented and urging the President to stop deportations. They called their walk the "Trail of Dreams."We're joined now By a student who came here from Ecuador when she was 7. Earlier this year, she along with three other students took a four-month long walk from Miami to Washington, D.C., talking to people about their experience of growing up undocumented and urging the president to stop deportations. They called their walk "The Trail of Dreams." We welcome you to "Democracy Now!" Your response?

MAE NGAI: The President had many positive things to say, I think. He acknowledged the history of immigrants and struck a note that said enforcement alone is not enough and criticized the Arizona law. I think those are all positive things. I think the big elephant in the room the president has not addressed in nobody's really talking about in this debate is why do have illegal immigration? The president suggests illegals come here because they are lawbreakers and chose to come illegally rather than get online. But what Americans do not understand is that line is a 20-year line if you're coming from Mexico. We have a system and what is broken is with a limited number of visas that we give to each country.

AMY GOODMAN: Why do you think President Obama gave this address?

MAE NGAI: I think he does believes an immigration reform. I think he has compassion—he does have a compassionate approach to the matter, but is also a politician. And I think the number one reason why he gave his address and why he is promoting reform is because the Latino electorate is now very important in American politics.

AMY GOODMAN: Gabriela Pacheco, your response to President Obama's first major address on immigration?
GABRIELA PACHECO: I think that this was the first time that we hear a major speech from the president, but not the first time that we hear him talking about immigration and as a matter of fact, I think that a lot of the people were waiting to hear more concrete examples of how we were going to move the issue forward and I think he did a really good job in laying out the history about the anti-immigrant movement that we are currently facing and hearing here in the country. But at the same time, I think that for a lot of us, who has been working on this issue for many, many years, we felt that it left us empty-handed and also left us with just more confusion and no direction on how we're really going to target this issue that is affecting millions of people.

AMY GOODMAN: Gabriela Pacheco, you clearly feel very strongly about this issue. You marched 1,500 miles, you and three other students. Three of you undocumented. You are risking a lot in doing that. Why did you do that "Trail of dreams"?
GABRIELA PACHECO: We risked it all because we saw we were not living are lives at all. We felt we were incarcerated and in jail in the land of the free. We did it because, myself, I have a bachelor's degree and two other degrees and even though I've been able to show and portray to this country and the world that I deserve an opportunity to live my life, because of the current laws in the system and how it is, I cannot. It was better to stand up for myself and to fight than to see myself going by the wayside.

AMY GOODMAN: One of the four students met with President Obama on Monday. What happened in that meeting?

GABRIELA PACHECO: Since we started walking, our request was for President Obama to have an audience with us. We wanted to tell him what was really happening on the ground. We had seen there's a huge disconnect between the administration and what is really happening in these communities. As a result, we have SB1070, 287g Agreements, more secure communities, and Juan Rodriguez was invited to participate in this meeting. And in this meeting we think that the president had the opportunity to hear from all the advocates mouth the disparity and the anger the Latino and the immigrant community currently has towards the administration. I think it does not have to do with the president himself, but the promises he made in the hope that he brought to our community, which we have not yet seen.

AMY GOODMAN: Gabriela Pacheco, you met Sheriff Arpaio in Arizona, the famous Sheriff who is known for his, to say the least, extremely harsh measures when it comes to dealing with prisoners?

GABRIELA PACHECO: That is correct. We went to Arizona because when we were walking, we heard the news of SB1070 signed into law by Jan Brewer. We felt this was a national disaster happening in the country. And as such we needed to go down there and see what never was that we could do. One of the things talking to the community, we saw that Phoenix, people and the immigrants there fear with all the fiber of their being Joe Arpaio. We tried to show the community there is nothing to fear, he is just a regular man like themselves and we went in there to talk to him and tell him to stop hurting our families and that we no longer were afraid of him, so we showed up to his office wearing pink polo shirts to kind of show the community the same way he says he calms his inmates by making them wear pink underwear. We were showing him we did not fear that color and we did not fear being detained and arrested by him. At the same time, we went in there to be as a non-violent movement that the walk was, to continue to spread what we feel is going to change this country, which is breaking into the hearts and minds of the average American, which has for many years been [misconstrued] because of the media, and what is said about this and we went in there to tell our stories personally from our mouths and say, our story is no different than the story of your family and how they can to this country.

AMY GOODMAN: Professor Mae Ngai what to you would be comprehensive immigration reform?

MAE NGAI: As I said before, the main problem in our immigration system, what is broken about it, is not just the administrative backlogs, not just that employers get away with hiring people and flouting labor laws. The problem with the immigration system is we have a ceiling on how many people can come, and that number is distributed to countries in an equal way. Every country has the same maximum number of green cards that can be given out a year. The number is 26,500. So Mexico is the same cap as Belgium or New Zealand. When President Obama says to get online at legally like everybody else, it depends on what country you're coming from. If you are from Mexico, the line could be 20 years, could even be 40 years depending on the category you are applying to. If you're from New Zealand, you do not have to get in line, or there is an administrative wait and there's no line. That is the problem, how we allocate the visas. It is a one size fits all approach when in fact, not all countries are the same size, not all of them have the same needs. And that would be comprehensive reform if we tackled that problem.

AMY GOODMAN: I want to thank you very much for joining us, Mae Ngai, Columbia University Professor, her book "Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America.". And also Gabriela Pacheco, for joining us from Miami, who walked "The Trail of Dreams, 1,500 miles to stop deportations.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/2/immigration
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://www.facebook.com/Peta51
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s


Thursday, July 01, 2010

Obama calls for immigration reform By the CNN Wire Staff

http://bit.ly/aca9FR

Obama calls for immigration reform By the CNN Wire Staff
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • President Obama calls for comprehensive immigration reform
  • Obama says effort must be bipartisan
  • Democratic sources see little hope for action before midterm elections

(CNN) -- President Obama called Thursday for comprehensive immigration reform, noting that people nationwide "have expressed frustration with [an immigration] system that seems fundamentally broken."


The president urged Congress to tackle immigration reform legislation, but he noted that it would require support from Democrats and Republicans.


"That is the political and mathematical reality," Obama said.


Despite Obama's call for bipartisan immigration reform, several senior Democratic sources said Thursday that they see virtually no chance of Congress taking up such a measure before November's midterm elections.


Though some hold out hope for some potential movement during a lame duck session of Congress after the election, most sources said next year is the more realistic earliest target. But even that, according to one source, may be "happy talk."


Still, these sources said politically it's crucial for the president to give a speech like he did Thursday to put pressure on Republicans, and more importantly to reassure angry Latino voters that Democrats haven't forgotten about this issue.


A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. national poll conducted in late May indicated that public support for beefing up security along the U.S. border with Mexico had grown significantly. According to the survey, nearly nine out of 10 Americans want to beef up U.S. law enforcement along the border with Mexico.


Eight in 10 questioned also supported a program that would allow illegal immigrants already in the United States to stay here and apply for legal residency if they had a job and paid back taxes. But only 38 percent said that program should be a higher priority than border security and other get-tough proposals. Six in 10 said border security was a the higher priority.

Obama also noted Thursday that illegal immigration "makes a mockery of all those who are going through the process" of legal immigration to the United States.


His speech follows a meeting this week in which the president discussed immigration reform with grass-roots leaders.


He said then he wants to see a bipartisan process for immigration reform based on a proposal presented in the Senate. The plan addresses the need to secure the border and demands accountability from both workers who are in the United States illegally and employers who take advantage of the system, the White House said.


True border security requires comprehensive immigration reform, Obama said.

The president also reiterated his views this week against the recently passed immigration law in Arizona, which the Justice Department is reviewing.


"From our meeting, it is clear that the president is committed to comprehensive immigration reform and understands that congressional action is needed urgently," said Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum and a meeting attendee.


Other topics discussed at the meeting included concerns that the grass-roots leaders had about reforms to current detention and deportation procedures, Noorani said.

CNN's Dana Bash contributed to this report


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unidos Venceremos! United We Will Win!
~Peta-de-Aztlan~ Sacramento, California, Amerika
Email: peter.lopez51@yahoo.com 
http://help-matrix.ning.com/
http://twitter.com/Peta_de_Aztlan
http://www.facebook.com/Peta51
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible,
make violent revolution inevitable."
~ President John F.Kennedy ~ Killed November 22, 1963
c/s


Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Important Craigslist Information

Important Craigslist Information

CRAIGSLIST TERMS OF USE
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to change, modify or otherwise alter your
account at any time. Therefore your account will be blocked.

To avoid deletion of your Craigslist account please Sign In:
Click here to confirm your Craigslist account.

Thanks,
Craigslist team