Monday, July 01, 2013

Read: [razaeducator] L4A Statement on the Senate CIR Bill!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Gracias Companero Carlos ~
+
#Latinos poised to catch up with whites in state's population ~via @SacBee: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/07/01/5536254/latinos-poised-to-catch-up-with.html  ~
++++
VIDEO: #Amnesty In Aztlán ~via @Peta_de_Aztlan
http://youtu.be/Hvb8HTMgid8 ~Published June 30, 2013 #Chicano
====
Join! Network Aztlan_News Yahoo Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/  ~ Focus on 'La Raza Cosmica'
====

Venceremos! We Will Win! Educate to Liberate!
Peter S. Lopez AKA @Peta_de_Aztlan
Sacramento, California

c/s


From: Carlos M. Montes <carlosmmontes5@aol.com>
To: scic_list@googlegroups.com; laeducators@yahoogroups.com; peac_group@googlegroups.com; latestnews@latinoscontralaguerra.org; latinocommittee@seiu721.info; stopcascomm@ndlon.org; stopfbila@googlegroups.com; stoplascomm@ndlon.org; razaeducator@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:11 PM
Subject: [razaeducator] L4A Statement on the Senate CIR Bill!

 
Please read and click your favorite social media link!
Carlos Montes
The time is now!
Legalization for all!
 If you wish to view the call or current endorsers:
http://www.bit.ly/legalizationforall
 
 
 

                                                La lucha sigue! Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Legalization for All (L4A) on  the Senate Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill
On Thursday, June 27th, the U.S. Senate passed an immigration reform bill by a 68 to 32 margin. 

If you wish to join us in this effort, please contact your local L4A network member.


Connect With Us!

Friend on Facebook Facebook
Follow on Twitter Twitter

On Thursday, June 27th
The U.S. Senate passed an immigration reform bill by a 68 to 32 margin. The Legalization For All (L4A) network strongly condemns the inclusion of the Corker-Hoever amendment in the Senate immigration reform bill.  The Corker-Hoever amendment will increase militarization on the border, expand the E-verify workplace enforcement, and try to track the more than one hundred and fifty million people who enter the United States each year.


The Senate bill that passed calls for an additional $46 billion to further militarize the border, including 20,000 more border patrol officers, hundreds of miles of new fencing, and mandates use of military technology.  This will mainly be felt by Mexicans and Central Americans trying to cross the border, leading to more deaths.
In response to this military "surge" on the border, more and more of our brothers and sisters living on or near the border, especially in Texas and Arizona are saying that this is no longer an immigration reform bill, but a border militarization bill.  In solidarity with our sisters and brothers on and near the border, Legalization For All cannot support the Senate bill that passed.

Since the beginning of this year's struggle for immigration reform, L4A has stood on principles based on what the people need.  We have called for legalization for all now! - don't exclude millions of undocumented and make them wait ten years for legal permanent residency.  L4A has opposed the proposals for more and more militarization of the border and supported calls to stop the deportations.

While the original "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" CIR Bill
Put forward by the Senate bipartisan "gang of eight" did grant temporary residency to most (but not nearly all) of the eleven million undocumented, it had a ten year wait for permanent residency.  In addition the original CIR bill put more border militarization first, restructured legal immigration to emphasize work, education, and speaking English above family reunification, expanded temporary worker programs, and increased government monitoring of workers.  And it said nothing about deportations, which continue at a record pace.


But then the Senate Democratic leadership followed a strategy of making the bill worse in order to attract some handfuls of Republican votes.  The Senate bill has now gone from bad to worse with the Corker-Hoever amendment.  In the House of Representatives there is no bipartisan CIR bill, and Republican House leader Boenher said that he would not bring forward the Senate bill unless the majority of Republicans in the House support it.  Given that the Senate bill doesn't even have the majority of Senate Republicans (who tend to be more moderate than Republicans in the House), it is quite possible that there will be no House immigration reform bill.

Legalization For All is putting out a call for a week of action and a national call-in day to congress when the House comes back from their holiday break on Monday, July 8th.  We demand that Congress put forward a bill that has legalization for all, reduces, not increases, border militarization, and stops the deportations!  

If you wish to join us in this effort, please contact your local L4A network member.
Copyright © *|2013|* *|Legalization For All|*, All rights reserved.

Our emailing address is:
*|LegalizationForAll@gmail.com|*
Stop The Deportations!
                                           






This email was sent to carlosmmontes5@aol.com
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Legalization For All · 310 Main Street, Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles, CA 90291

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp
__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


Efren: Read: Sacbee - Latinos poised to catch up with whites in state's population

+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Good to post Link source:

#Latinos poised to catch up with whites in state's population ~via @SacBee: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/07/01/5536254/latinos-poised-to-catch-up-with.html  ~sharing @Peta_de_Aztlan

We are so so separated and scattered. Time to come together in love and unity.

Venceremos! We Will Win! Educate to Liberate!


Join! Network Aztlan_News Yahoo Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/ ~
Focus on 'La Raza Cosmica'

Peter S. Lopez AKA @Peta_de_Aztlan
Sacramento, California

c/s


From: "chicano11@comcast.net" <chicano11@comcast.net>
To: Steven Payan <eyetileye@yahoo.com>; Tony Gonzalez <eltonyg@earthlink.net>; Eddie Madrigal <edmadrigal@yahoo.com>; Ivonne Esquivel <Deltamag7@aol.com>; Jim Felton <jim_floors@yahoo.com>; Harold Fong <hfong95831@yahoo.com>; Fred Millar <fredmillar1@gmail.com>; Francisco R Garcia <frank_r_garcia@yahoo.com>; Brisa Trujillo <filohoy@yahoo.com>; Faye Kennedy <fayek@springmail.com>; David Fontaine <dfontaine2004@yahoo.com>; Carolina Flores <Carolina.elena.flores@gmail.com>; Feather Wolfin <doahiwolfin@yahoo.com>; Mona Foster <tutus@surewest.net>; Goya Gutierrez <goyag@sbcglobal.net>; Gail Ryall <gryall@comcast.net>; Eric Guerra <guerra.eric@gmail.com>; Gilbert Tafoya <Gilbert@tafoya.net>; Tony Perez <ganasperez@yahoo.com>; Joaquin Galvan <jdgalvan@ucdavis.edu>; Steve Gandola <steve@sachcc.org>; Mario Galvan <mario@zsc.org>; Josi Garcia <jgarcia@quicktype.com>; Gaberial Torres <gabrieistorres@yahoo.com>; George Azar <geeazar@gmail.com>; Xico Gonzalez <revoltoso@gmail.com>; Maryann Gonzales <maryann.gonzales@sbcglobal.net>; Marcus Gomez <marcus@californiaclothing.net>; Antonio Gonzalez <agonzalez@svrep.org>; Michael F Hernandez <michael.hernandez@cdph.ca.gov>; Hector Navejas <hnavejas@vidaenelvalle.com>; Juan Hernandez <Tarasca7@yahoo.com>; Monica Hernandez <mhernandez@sacog.org>; Paramo E Hernandez <azteca1957@aol.com>; Rodrigo Ibarra <tatiduli@yahoo.com>; Irvis Orozco <imorozco@ucdavis.edu>; James Shelby <jshelby@gsul.org>; Juan Carlos Ruiz Rubio <jcruiz52@hotmail.com>; Olivia Jacobo <jacoboo@saccounty.net>; Jim Blea <jimbe@surewest.net>; Kendra Bridges <Kendra.Bridges@gmail.com>; Walter Kawamoto <Waltertk@yahoo.com>; Auturo / Katie Villanueva <Katietho1981@yahoo.com>; Katie Valenzula <katie@ubuntugreen.org>; Silvia M Landers <silvialanders@gmail.com>; Luisa Menchaca <lucha2004@hotmail.com>; Amelia Zamora <ladya126@hotmail.com>; Michael Orosco <mjorosco@aol.com>; Emma Lozano <psf@somosunpueblo.com>; Pete Lopez <peter.lopez51@yahoo.com>; Lino Pedres <lino.pedres@seiu-usww.org>; John Ruedas <jrueda@ruedalaw.com>; Randy Lopez <Randylopez2008@hotmail.com>; Steve J Ybarra <sjybarra@aol.com>; Silvia Moran <silviamoran48@sbcglobal.net>; Eric Vega <sac86880@csus.edu>; Rev Ashiya Odeye <therev@justicereformcoalition.org>; Samaya Perran <samayaperran@sbcglobal.net>; Rick Guerrero <sacgreendems@gmail.com>; Robert Saunders <rsaund3980@aol.com>; Daniel M Savala <dsavala@cityofsacramento.org>
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 5:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: Sacbee - Latinos poised to catch up with whites in state's population




From: chicano11@comcast.net
To: "Adrian Perez" <aperez@pop-9.com>, "Adolfo R Mercado" <amercado@saccds.org>, "Alice Perez" <adperez1@gmail.com>, "Arturo Aleman" <aaleman01@comcast.net>, "Alex Vasquez" <Atgcal@yahoo.com>, "Alaine Murphy Hasan" <eyehas@frontiernet.net>, "Alex Canela" <canelaa21@yahoo.com>, "Alex Barrios" <alex_p_barrios@yahoo.com>, "Alberto L Gonzalez" <alberto.gonzalez@doj.ca.gov>, "Xochitl Arellano" <xochitl1@comcast.net>, "Gustavo Arroyo" <gustavoarroyo1@gmail.com>, "Arturo Venegas Jr" <artvenegas@gmail.com>, "Arnulfo Hernandez Jr" <arnulfoh@sbcglobal.net>, "Armando Botello" <armandobotello@aol.com>, "Suzanne Brooks" <creativesy@aol.com>, "Brit Irby" <Brit-Irby@sac-city.k12.ca.us>, "Desaree Rojas" <bezdez812@yahoo.com>, "Belinda Alvarez" <belin202@yahoo.com>, "Manuel Barajas" <mbarajas@csus.edu>, "Baldemar Garcia" <garciab@saccounty.net>, "Colin Bailey" <colinabailey@gmail.com>, "Ruben Banuelos" <banuelosruben@yahoo.com>, "Dr Mary R Bell" <NubianStrength@aol.com>, "Betty Williams" <higherhop@aol.com>, "Karen Bernal" <nekochan99@hotmail.com>, "Bernie Buenrostro" <bernxbb@ix.netcom.com>, "Bernadette D Chiang" <bcadesign@sbcglobal.net>, "Bill Kennedy" <bkennedy@lsnc.net>, "Jose Borrego" <info@joseborregolaw.com>, "Diana M. Borroel" <diana.borroel@yahoo.com>, "Paul Burke" <paulb1221@sbcglobal.net>, "Carlos Mora" <csmora@sbcglobal.net>, "Cristina Mora" <cmora@cccco.edu>, "Jesus Hernandez" <clearprinting@yahoo.com>, "Carmen Hernandez" <carmen.hernandez@comcast.net>, "Carolina Rojas - Gore" <cgore@univision.net>, "Luis Cespedes" <cespedes_law@comcast.net>, "Teresa Coalitalupe" <tmichael2000@hotmail.com>, "Margarita Colmenares" <thinkverde@yahoo.com>, "Robin Corralejo" <robin_corralejo@calpers.ca.gov>, "Maggie Coulter" <peacegato@yahoo.com>, "Miguel Cordova" <mcordova@cde.ca.gov>, "Corin Ramos" <Corin@nationalmecha.org>, "Francisco Dominques" <fotowaddle@gmail.com>, "Debbie Maldonado" <DMaldonado32@comcast.net>, "Daniel Bacher" <danielbacher@fishsniffer.com>, "Norm DeYoung" <nrdeyoung@yahoo.com>, "Eric & Lulu De Gracia" <e.gracia@sbcglobal.net>, "Dianna Rodriguez" <dezra_93@yahoo.com>, "Debra Ortiz" <dortiz1@surewest.net>, "Ramon Diaz" <AurelianoSi@att.net>
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 4:54:20 PM
Subject: Fwd: Sacbee - Latinos poised to catch up with whites in state's population




Hi Everyone

Wanted to pass along the Good News ...
Please share with others, take care and stay cool All ...

 Efren G.



I thought you'd like this:
Read this story

Sacbee - Latinos poised to catch up with whites in state's population
Perhaps today or certainly sometime very soon, another baby will be born or a new immigrant will arrive and the number of Latinos in California will equal the state's non-Hispanic white population, according to official state population projections.


To unsubscribe click here.


Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Border Militarization Amendment Prevails with Majority Democratic Vote

Border Militarization Amendment Prevails with Majority Democratic Vote
No Faustian Bargain for Us

We are living in unprecedented times.  Today is another day of infamy in the annals of attempted immigration reform in these United States of America.  The U.S. Senate approved an amendment to S.744, the heralded bi-partisan comprehensive immigration reform legislation supported by President Obama, to double the number of border patrol agents from the current 21,000 to 40,000 along the U.S.-Mexico border. Other elements of the amendment proposed by Republican Senators Bob Corker of Tennessee and John Hoeven of North Dakota, include 700 additional miles of border wall, more drones, towers, cameras, and sensors to the tune of a $30 billion price-tag.  The vote was 67-27.  The majority of the aye votes were cast by Democratic Senators.

Senator Charles Schumer from New York, Democratic Party senate leader, and considered the architect of the “gang of eight” bi-partisan CIR initiative, cut the deal with his Republican colleagues who rightly recognized that their amendment was over the top on the enforcement side.  New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez also voted for the border surge amendment.  The Democrats explained their action as the compromise price to pay for getting the 70 vote margin desired to report the bill out of the Senate.

When all the other punitive measures embedded in S.744 are taken into consideration we literally have a bill of unprecedented measures.  The border amendment is the final proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back.  The legislation is anything but fair and humane to immigrant families and foretells an immigration point system inclined towards addressing fictional labor demands in detriment to family reunification, the permanent criminalization of immigrant workers, and the militarization of the southern border - without exaggeration.  Other actions include:

  1. The unprecedented police build-up in the work-place via the mandatory use of E-verify nationally with all employers.  This is the greatest intervention of the federal government into the private world of work.
  2. The unprecedented creation of a biometric ID for immigrant workers that could easily be expanded to obligate all American citizens to possess.
  3. The unprecedented enhanced collaboration between local and state police agencies with the Department of Homeland Security for database sharing, detention, and transfer of detainees.
  4. The unprecedented punitive requirements that condition the provisional status offered under the legislation to the undocumented contrast greatly with how European immigrants were treated in earlier eras.  It’s hard to qualify the status as anything but indentured servitude under the sophism of “earned legalization.”  The decade length of provisional status is conditioned by paying all back taxes, paying hefty fees and fines, passing a criminal background check, no lapses of employment greater than 60 days during 10 years, annual earnings of 125 percent of the federal poverty guideline ($28,812 for a family of four, for example), and learn English and American civics and history (heretofore a requirement for U.S. citizenship).

It’s apparent that the legislators are demanding a quality of resident superior in character and worthiness than the citizens who populate the nation.  Numerous research institutions have verified that the majority of the undocumented have been in the country in excess of five years.  More than half have resided here for at least ten.  When the decade-plus provisional period is tacked on most applicants will have completed between 15 to 20 years of “earning their permanent status” just short of the citizenship opportunity.

Two additional immigration enforcement bills have already surfaced in the House side of Congress, in the House Judiciary Committee, which portends worst things to come.  One, the unprecedented change from civil offense to criminal offense for unauthorized entry to the U.S., and two, a bill that would disqualify any youth affiliated or identified with a gang for any form of legalization.  

Over the past 30 years local police agencies have received inordinate Justice Department funding to create “gang” databases in their respective communities.  Latino and black youth have been the natural targets of the racial profiling that resulted from such programs.  Once in the database youth pay hell to get off it.

House Speaker John Boehner recently declared that he has every intention of applying the Hastert Rule of not moving any immigration legislation that is not supported by a majority of Republican House members.  However, since the Senate moved so harshly to the right with the Corker-Hoeven amendment such a majority threshold may not be far-fetched.  For example, even conservative Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has now expressed favor for S.744.

On the other hand, private conversations with various members of Congress admit that a majority of the 11 million undocumented will not qualify to legalize their status and will naturally be the new deportees.  The clauses of the legislation tell the story themselves.  Is this the kind of America that we want for ourselves and our posterity?  Many of the Washington, D.C.-funded immigrant advocacy agencies and coalitions, and their affiliates nationally, have accepted the Faustian bargain presented to them by Obama and the Democratic Party leadership.  The “advocates” have offered their souls in exchange for the ostensible diabolical favors.  Some have even deluded themselves into believing that any form of legal status obtained, however tenuous and painful, can be the basis for continued organizing for improvements in any bill signed into law.  This is false on its face, and actually quite dangerous.

Hermandad Mexicana is the oldest immigrant membership organization of the Mexican and Latino communities in the U.S., founded in 1951, and has experienced many cycles of legislation advocacy, repression, mass deportations, bracero programs - 1942-1964 (Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson), the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952 (Truman), Operation Wetback of 1952-54 (Eisenhower), the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Johnson), IRCA of 1986 (Reagan), the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (Clinton), and the mega-marches of 2006 forward.  

We stand on the shoulders of our founders and leaders and their many experiences and lessons on organizing under the most trying of circumstances.  We are not funded by the government, corporations, private foundations or their political parties, and therefore, not beholden to them.  No president or CEO can tell us to “shut the fuck up” and not tinker with the proposed legislation by amendments as did Obama to his selected “Latino leaders” at the White House in May 2013.  Our members are flesh and blood, not virtual, and we meet and consult with thousands of them regularly, and solely to them are we beholden. There is no Faustian bargain for us.  S.744 smells rotten to the core and the most recent border militarization amendment and the corollary House Judiciary Committee bills moved us to publicly oppose this legislation.

We admonish those “advocates” and union leaders who do not recognize the national security character of the proposed legislation and related amendments under the guise of “comprehensive immigration reform” that moves the country closer to a police state with all the insidious totalitarian trappings.  We are living in perilous times.  We have a responsibility to be truthful and more insightful and not allow ourselves to be used for partisan interests foreign to those of our families.  The political parties and their politicians need us more than we need them.  Our strength devolves from our faith and ability to organize ourselves and to persevere.  Put your trust and faith in the people, not in the politicians and the parties and corporations that they serve.  

June 24, 2013 – Team Hermandad




+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Network-Aztlan-News-Blog Link=
http://aztlannet-news-blog.blogspot.com/

Join Up!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/

Network-Aztlan Home Page
http://www.networkaztlan.com/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Monday, June 24, 2013

Read: WHAT WOULD THE OLD MAN DO (as CIR/S744 Goes Bad)? By Antonio González ~via Efren

+++++++++++++++++++++++++http://aztlannet-news-blog.blogspot.com/2013/06/re-fwd-what-would-old-man-do-as-cirs744.html 

Venceremos! We Will Win! Educate to Liberate!
Peter S. Lopez AKA @Peta_de_Aztlan

Yahoo Group: NetworkAztlan_News : ~ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetworkAztlan_News/  ~
Sacramento, California

c/s


From: "chicano11@comcast.net" <chicano11@comcast.net>
To: chicano11@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 8:49 AM
Subject: Fwd: WHAT WOULD THE OLD MAN DO (as CIR/S744 Goes Bad)? By Antonio González


Hi Everyone

 Great article, we must consider or realize what's in play ... Will we allow our community to be used again, as pawns in a game of chess. Really just being played once again to re - elect the same old faces an interest's that keep our community
 in limbo filling our heads with a promise that things will get better - please ... Be patient , I fear we are all becoming "OLD MEN & Women" an we will keep hearing this same old story... Empowerment is at our foot steps (50 Mil & growing, every minute) let's not, we owe it our community and to ourselves to do it right and not settle for something, because we're getting close to the election cycle. It's long over due to say that we will no longer be the stepping stone's or welcoming mates of those who are not working for the best interest of our community at heart... The ball is in our corner, what are We going to do. are you with us or against us !!!!  
Always with love and respect to all of you in my/our community and to all who are blessed with getting old ....
 Take care All ...

 Efren G.
 Exec Dir - CC de Sacra
 Est 92



From: "National Latino Congreso" <mail@latinocongreso.org>
To: efren@chicano.cc
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 4:25:36 PM
Subject: WHAT WOULD THE OLD MAN DO (as CIR/S744 Goes Bad)? By Antonio González


Hi, just a reminder that you're receiving this email because you have expressed an interest in National Latino Congreso. Don't forget to add mail@latinocongreso.org to your address book so we'll be sure to land in your inbox!
You may unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails.

The Politics and Policy Convention of the Latino Community
HISPANIC LINK
06/20/13
WHAT WOULD THE OLD MAN DO (as CIR/S744 Goes Bad)?
As S744, the Senate's comprehensive immigration reform bill continues its tortured transformation from an ostensibly well-intentioned reform concept to a punitive, national security bill, Latinos leaders are increasingly questioning the worthiness of the measure.
The internal debate is being polarized by those who say the bill is the "last chance" to legalize the undocumented even though S744 as written contains fatal flaws that will:
·      exclude most undocumented from legalization;
·      continue mass deportations;
·      create de facto immigrant worker indentured servitude;
·      fund billions in defense industry pork for more drones walls, and guards on the U.S.-Mexico border;
·      enable massive racial profiling and discrimination by codifying E-verify;
But this is not the first time the immigrant and Latino movements' centerpiece reform bill has been overrun by xenophobic forces. History is repeating itself as S744 is being hijacked just as was the 1982 legalization bill advocated by then US Representative Edward Roybal (D-East Los Angeles).
    
Legendary in Latino circles and affectionately referred to as "the Old Man," Ed Roybal was the father of Latino empowerment in California as well as a founder of the nascent immigrant rights movement.
    
In 1982 after years of trying to legalize undocumented immigrants Roybal championed the Simpson-Mazzoli legalization bill. But when the bill was amended to include measures that violated labor and human rights, Roybal introduced dozens of amendments, effectively killing the bill he had earlier advocated.
    
California Latino leaders including Roybal would try and fail again in 1984, this time walking out at the Democratic National Convention shaming presidential nominee Walter Mondale after Democratic Congressional leadership allowed anti-immigrant forces to gut the Latino-supported reform bill. The walkout killed the hijacked bill.
    
Persistence paid off as Roybal helped lead a coalition that in partnership with Republican President Reagan prodded Congress in 1986 to enact the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), an effective legalization for 2.9 million undocumented persons, an estimated 70 percent of the undocumented at that time.
    
The "amnesty" provisions of IRCA, contrary to the balderdash heard today in D.C., are sanctified among Latinos as one of the best programs ever undertaken by the federal government. That "amnesty" had immensely positive socio-economic benefits for immigrant-heavy states such as California and Texas in ensuing years.
    
How different Roybal's 1982 and 1984 conclusions were to those of Democrats now! Today's Democratic legislators appear set to support "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" no matter how punitive and/or ineffective its provisions are. Democrats want to claim victory with Latino voters who are spun daily by corporate media that hypes the bill in lockstep with the liberal establishment.
    
There's too much pressure from the donors and special interests "to jump ship even if it's the right thing to do" complain legislators and advocates. Indeed, President Obama held a White House meeting with advocates in May, instructing them not to try to improve S744. Importantly, liberal foundations and interest groups supporting comprehensive immigration reform have donated tens of millions in recent years to mostly D.C.-based immigrant rights and Latino groups, in essence co-opting them.
    
But enacting federal legislation is not for the faint-hearted. Those who purport to represent America's immigrants in the halls of Congress would do well to remember Roybal. The "Old Man" would've have scuttled this deal for he wisely knew that "no bill is better than a bad bill."
   
The new "Latino/Latina experts" who populate the cable networks should believe their own words. Fifty million Latinos today are more powerful than ever and need not accept bad legislation like migajeros (beggars). Just as it wasn't in 1982 or 1984, this is not Latinos' last chance.
    
Thanks to the immigrant rights mass movement and ever-growing Latino vote, public opinion has pivoted from excluding immigrants to including immigrants. Polls clearly favor a generous legalization law. Now the Latino challenge is to get Congress to reflect that reality, with inclusive, non-punitive legislation, whether in 2013, 2015 or 2017.
    
S744 falls far short of that goal. It should be dramatically improved or rejected. "Old Man" Roybal would have demanded nothing less.
    
(Antonio González is president of the William C. Velásquez Institute in San Antonio, Texas. Reach him at agonzalez@wcvi.org.)
    
For more news and commentary, go to www.HispanicLink. org.

This email was sent to efren@chicano.cc by mail@latinocongreso.org |  

Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe| Privacy Policy.
National Latino Congreso | William C. Velasquez Institute | 1426 El Paso | San Antonio | TX | 78207